Professional Soldiers ® - View Single Post

Retired W4 · 11-25-2007, 07:07

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodo...l/SB00378I.htm

is a Texas Senate bill introduced for consideration. The current Section 9 (Use of Deadly Force) was posted by me previously, and includes Defence of Property of a Third Person, which is what the shooter in Pasadena was doing. The antidotal evidence about previous shootings was entered here to give some historical perspective on the leanings of the Grand Juries that have considered like incidents.

My completely uneducated and uninformed, non-professional Texas Bubba guess is the results of the Grand Jury impaneled to consider this case will be: No Bill! That, of course, will be based on the current laws of the state of Texas, regardless of what people in other states think the law should be.

Maybe some of the TX lawyers on the board can tell me if I'm completely screwed up.

11-25-2007, 07:07	#28
Retired W4 Guerrilla Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Currently Tucker, GA Posts: 117	From a former TX Bubba' http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodo...l/SB00378I.htm is a Texas Senate bill introduced for consideration. The current Section 9 (Use of Deadly Force) was posted by me previously, and includes Defence of Property of a Third Person, which is what the shooter in Pasadena was doing. The antidotal evidence about previous shootings was entered here to give some historical perspective on the leanings of the Grand Juries that have considered like incidents. My completely uneducated and uninformed, non-professional Texas Bubba guess is the results of the Grand Jury impaneled to consider this case will be: No Bill! That, of course, will be based on the current laws of the state of Texas, regardless of what people in other states think the law should be. Maybe some of the TX lawyers on the board can tell me if I'm completely screwed up.
Retired W4 is offline