I would offer the opinion that if it takes no more effort to enter the shot data into the ballistic computer or PDA, fine, tell me what the total correction for windage and elevation is and let me get on with it.
If I were trying to crunch numbers manually, the target will have moved on by the time I got the correct answer. I can't hold .25 moa at 1600 meters from a field firing position anyway.
My novice shooting opinion is that at that range, most first shots are going to be misses for ranging, winds, slope, target movement, etc. anyway, better to watch point of impact closely and get a good corrected second round out before he hears the first, and don't worry about Coriolis effects.
Just my .02, now that we have heard from LR, I suspect that Gene will be along with some good points shortly.
TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910
De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
|