Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Broadsword2004
True; I just meant maybe making the language where they can't try to twist it like they do. If it literally had the words, "right of the individual person to keep and bear arms," then lawyers and politicians, like the ones in D.C. and elsewhere, would have no way I would think to say the 2nd AM refers only to the militia like they do.
|
In a perfect world, all the AM's to the CONUS would NOT BE argued for validity as they are written. We do not live in that world.
The disection and autopsy of the 2AM by leftist gun grabbing pundits is merely the democratic way of attacking that to which they do not like. it's no surprise that the "Wording" of the 2AM would come under scrutiny by leftist liberal gun grabbers and like minded sheep. After all, if the newly elected senate and congress have taken an oath to protect the CONUS, then all bets are off. Unfortunatley this is not the case. The left will only swear to uphold the CONUS in the form that they see fit for their agenda.
Like minded liberal democrats fought tooth and nail with the current administration in the recent wire tapping scandal by the NSA and intel agencies. All under the disguise of "Constitutional Grounds" That being the 4th AM. At the same time, they are trying desperatley to infringe your other rights. Today they are even attacking the 1st AM that has won them their seats.
How exactly are they doing this ? Let me explain. Nancy Pelosi has recommended that any organization with 500 members or more is given a "Grass Roots" intiative title. You got it !! Even this board and forum, if in the eyes of the liberals does not serve their purpose, it would require us to submit all the members names and addresses.
We are currently living a dangerous world, and I do not mean just Islamic Jihad, but rather our own Jihad to the CONUS and that which it stands for.