Quote:
|
Originally Posted by x_sf_med
The author seems to forget that the US was a colony, and through the use of light fighting and insurgency - beat the Empire. We, as a nation have forgotten our roots, and have mainstreamed our military over the last 200+ years to match the 'regular' forces of the European model. As a point of fact, most of the irregular units that fought and won our 'insurrection' were disbanded almost immediately after the surrender of Cornwallis. What gained us our freedoms, and set us apart was our use of irregular forces, guerrillas, insurgency, and stealth - the Brits called it cowardly, and ungentlemanly, the Phrench borrowed a few of the models, as did the Germans and Poles. Our military should remember its revolutionary roots, but has become mired in the conventional, mainstream and bureaucratic traditions of the European model. Our military has no one to balme but itself for its conventionalism. We, as SF soldiers, chose to train for the battles that others despised, because there was less glory but much more gain, we chose to stay with the roots of the irregular Revolutionary Army, look at our heritage right down to Roger's Rangers...
***rant, over***
|
Irregular forces should disappear after the successful conclusion of a war, unless they wish to continue to resist the new government.
It is a common misconception that irregular forces and unconventional warfare won the Revolutionary War. The irregulars and the militia usually cut and ran when the real fighting started. Some of the largest battles they fought was with rival Loyalist forces in their AORs. The war was concluded largely fought and won by a conventional ground victory with the assistance of the French Navy, but most of all, by the decision of the Brits to sue for peace.
FYI, the conventional forces were stood down as well, or rerturned to their respective states as militia members.
The founding fathers feared a standing army, and the post-War Army was very small indeed.
TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910
De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
|