View Single Post
Old 10-09-2006, 14:05   #12
GreenSalsa
Quiet Professional
 
GreenSalsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fort Bragg, NC
Posts: 503
Just a thought here…

The “weapon” was detonated in a remote site, with NO outside observers…

There was NO “cratering” and NO radioactivity detected at the site… (admittedly it could take as long as a year for those gasses to escape)

Finally, the weapon was only estimated at 550 tons… (VERY small nuke, only 10% of what the Hiroshima bomb was in 1945)

Just a wild guess, but if you have a crappy hand in poker, you bluff…

I would bet money he “faked” a nuke demonstration for the attention, and the inevitable aid that would come if he were to “stop” further testing—besides who will call his bluff?

What do you guys think?

GreenSalsa is offline   Reply With Quote