View Single Post
Old 03-29-2004, 20:37   #18
Sacamuelas
JAWBREAKER
 
Sacamuelas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gulf coast
Posts: 1,906
QRQ 30,Sir ... I think you may be overlooking the ambush from the Dems if she did agree to testify.

All they would do is ask the same questions as they did when she testified behind closed doors.....EXCEPT she would have to answer a LOT of questions with a " I refuse to answer that question" or " I can not comment on that specific issue due to national security concerns". IT would appear to the ignorant TV viewer and specifically be portrayed by the lib media that she was attempting a "cover up". In reality, it would simply mean that some material is not suitable for public knowledge.

That and we would run the risk of some A-Hole demoRat phrasing a question in a manner that includes classified information just by posing it. It would be a cluster F&%$ and everyone knows it would only muddy the waters of public opinion.

Better to stick to their principles than give in and look secretive and defensive.

Pure political puppet show at this point. If it were really about a bipartisan commission seeking out the truth, this wouldn't be an issue as she has testified fully and completely to the commission. Just my.02

Last edited by Sacamuelas; 03-29-2004 at 20:41.
Sacamuelas is offline   Reply With Quote