Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Reaper
I believe the last Dem POTUS, named Clinton, IIRC, eliminated TWO SF GROUPS, and considered the elimination of Third Group.
|
Wait you have to think about Hillary Clinton's stand. When she was in the House.
La casa blanca... "mi casa blanca es su casa del whote"
She never wanted to see a uniform person/ member when she would walk around the White House. But now (and other DEMS) she is all about the military and the support of.
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors...ry-soldier.htm
So now these "people" are saying how great the military is. Most of them have never served in the military, but tell the military how to/should get bigger.
Now the military (DoD) SWC, USASOC, USASFC all look to see how "we" can "up" the numbers for the force. Wait isn't the force smaller, but why is that?? DEMS maybe.
Maybe we should add:
Dereliction of Duty : The Eyewitness Account of How Bill Clinton Compromised America's National Security, by Robert Patterson to the recommended reading list.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Daver
Finally consider this...only 10-15% of the US population is eligible to enter the Army...that number is dropped to 1/10th of 1% of those 10-15% who might be eligible to enter SFAS. Historically, SFAS only selects 43%....my math is not perfect but added up, only those select few will ever be true SF soldiers and that is why in my humble opinion "THEY" will never be able to double our numbers.
|
This is so true, you just can't make SF or "special people". Just like new initiatives, why do we need more special people when we have so many other units out there. I was never good at Math, I guess others weren't either.
VG