View Single Post
Old 03-25-2006, 17:48   #10
uboat509
Quiet Professional
 
uboat509's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: CO
Posts: 333
Quote:
Originally Posted by a-3-7
"He provided details of the semi-rural area north-west of Baghdad where he was held and confirmed that his captors were criminals, rather than insurgents. Their motive was believed to be money."

"It blamed the kidnapping on the presence of foreign troops in the country, which was "responsible for so much pain and suffering in Iraq today".

I think that this is a good example of cognitive dissonance. Either the kidnappers were common criminals, motivated only by money or they were insurgents who were trying to fight the "illegal occupation" of Iraq, unless you are a far left moron with an ax to grind with the coalition. Then they can be both.


SFC W
uboat509 is offline   Reply With Quote