![]() |
I need some help
I need some help if anyone can help me. I'm going to be going through the 18 E course and i was wondering if anyone could help me on some information that i can start studying on so i can get the one up. So if anyone could help me just please email me or i'll be checking later thank you. brock.buddles@us.army.mil
|
This is a general comment good for all MOS's.
Concentrate on what you are doing. Getting a "leg up" can work against you. Unless things have changed, they will teach you everything you need to know and more in the course. Read a few books on the underground and covert opns during WWII. Nothing technical but interesting info on clandestine communications. Leave the technical stuff to the instructors. Just my opinion. |
Where are you in the Pipeline?
TR |
Let me add one thing. Presuming they still teach Morse Code you may get a leg up there. I spent a lot of my evenings in Ding Dong School trying to master the 18 WPM sending and receiving tests. :eek:
Do a search and there are several sites (some free) on the Web where you can learn and practice. A book on BASIC antenna theory can be helpful. The AARL Antenna Handbook was my bible and I almost always had it with me. It is a great MOS. I'm glad to see they are sending more experienced students there. In my day the commo and demo classes were almost all pvts and Pfcs like me. The older soldiers with prior service tended to go to weapons and O&! training. I lied in a privious post. I did get promoted in Training Group -- from Pvt E-2 to Pfc E-3. :D |
Quote:
TR |
Quote:
Jack Moroney |
Quote:
I was there for that meeting. Some of the stupidest questions I ever heard were asked that day. This decision to drop it was made about two or three years ago. I agree that I liked having that capability, but it was decided that the time was better spent learning about computers and modern electronics. Plus, as you know, it was a significant attrition point, even after dropping the standard to 15/15 GPM. TR |
Quote:
Jack Moroney |
Quote:
Not arguing the point, but consider this. We have currently been at war for more than three years. None of the SF casualties in this war I am aware of, or mission failures have resulted from an inability to make commo. IIRC, most have been from the USAF dropping ordnance on friendlies, with commo up. Not saying that it can't or won't happen, but it hasn't been a significant factor so far, as far as I know. TR |
I think the GWOT is bigger than Middle East. However, I always thought of a SF medic as the best trained and most valuable member of a team in a UWOA. Not just for taking care of the troops but also MEDCAP.
|
Considering the changes/upgrades in communications, the challenge now lies in the complexity of setting up and establishing communications. Everything is computerized and technology is changing so fast. By the time I finished the Echo course, through Sage, Language School and SERE there was already new equipment on the team that I had not seen.
With the -137, HF commo has changed. You can damn near drag a 30' wire behind you and make commo on the move with a low probablity of being detected, if that was a concern in todays combat situations. Although, there where days (and nights) in Max Gain doing single channel HF data that I wished I had known morse code to burn my message through. |
Good point para. When all else fails it seems you can pick up IMC. Even back when we were beginning high speed commo, a short burst of static could wipe out a whole page of info.
|
Quote:
Jack Moroney |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:30. |
Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®