![]() |
lower standard in SFAS, Q school
I have a son who is in 1st group now, loving the work and doing great. Considering he is there, I pay attention to what is going on in the SF world, and have a major concern with the lowering of standards in SFAS and a shorter Q course. I talked to a former SF colonel, now retired, and he basically said that the team sergeant would then get a person coming to the team up to speed so to speak. I wonder if this is actually feasible considering how busy the teams are, and how badly this is going to affect the teams in the coming years? In my opinion, this would certainly make things harder for my son's team with an undertrained, not as tough as should be kind of person coming to the team, especially if things get dicey. But maybe I am wrong?
One other thought, with women now making it through SFAS, am not against a woman in combat, if it were with an all women team. Thoughts? |
In my opinion, the course was way too long. They wanted the perfect Green Beret upon graduation. Back in the ‘60s thru late ‘80s the course was 4-6 months long and produced some outstanding troops.
Some schools/segments of schools are a waste of time. The real learning begins once you arrive on a team. |
Quote:
|
STANDARDS : Then & NOW.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Nov.22, 1962
YES IT WAS FRIDAY:
|
I went through in 1984. January through May. SERE wasn't mandatory as we had POW and survival training in Phase 1, no Camp Slappy.
Language wasn't required if you had one on your ORB (I had high school and college Spanish and took the DLPT). Now it takes two years or longer if you're not a medic? And you can be dropped before the end of the whole pipeline? They must be technically and tactically perfect James Bond/Jason Bourne/ninjas at the back end. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41. |
Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®