Verdict
 

There's no better metaphor for San Francisco's liberal policies than last evening's verdict where the rights of an illegal alien were protected above all else and there was no justice for this young woman, an American citizen. Let's hope this left coast city can still be crippled in a civil suit.

Lets not beat ourselves up over this - the left went about the business of corrupting the legal and judicial systems generations ago. This is just those efforts finally bearing fruit in a public forum.

The story of Kitty Genovese is a parallel to the way liberals treat crime. They don't want to get involved, they are afraid of consequence. They favor feigned compassion and inaction to anything that vaguely resembles decency and justice.

The people on the left side of this nations political spectrum are morally and ethically corrupt and for the most part they are opposed to ANY level of justice that might detract from their ability to "feel good" or have a good time.

...as long as the votes are in my favor, my aide doesn't blab to the press that I am fucking my employees, and the media champions my cause when I get busted, life will be just fine.

Exactly right, utter madness! Terrible tragedy all around. I can't help think where this will go, it's bad there now, it will become absolutely hellish. Why anyone would do this to the society they live in is beyond contemplation.

You can't entice cheap mexican slave labor by throwing them in prison. Someone has to pick the avocados, wash the restaurant dishes and do the landscaping. Sure as fuck will not be a white/black californian that does those slave labor jobs.

California, land of the sanctuary cities and the "elites".

Thinking about this case off and on for two years now, I never ever would have thought anything less than manslaughter would prevail. If I would have pulled the trigger I can guarantee I would at least 10 years. They must have had a very incompetent prosecutor.
Just goes to show you how screwed up this system is today.

Don't kid yourself Chucko - the system is functioning EXACTLY the way that Californians want it to function.

If you come upon a scene and there is a broken window - next to the broken window is a liberal standing next to a rock...
...the window is not defective. Liberals would have you believe it is the windows fault.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...y-verdict.html

Look on the bright side, California has just created a new definition of case law.

Garcia Zarate vs. The State of California: No person can reasonably be held accountable for the unlawful and unintentional discharge of a firearm that results in the death or serious injury to others. Proximity to others, location or city ordinances and laws banning the intentional or unintentional discharge of firearms is no longer a prosecutorial offense.

All those people who’ve been charged and convicted of killing or maiming someone while handling a firearm that discharged by: manual manipulation, dropping, twirling, caressing, showing off, playing with (loaded, unloaded, or condition unknown) or otherwise shooting one off into the sky...should have their conviction overturned and be set free immediately.

If there was no intent there cannot be a crime.

I’m certain the Ninth Circuit will uphold the decision of the jury against all appeals brought by the (Trump) DOJ.

Note: Even more troubling that you have to deep search the news for this story.

"Forget it, Jake. It's California."

California Governor Jerry Brown To Allow HIV Positive People To Donate Blood

Pat

What was the permitted and presented evidence?

I saw clips discussing that the Sig did not have an external safety which makes me think they were trying to argue it's too easy to discharge and betting on a juries lack of firearms knowlege.

Also, if it was a so called ricochet that killed her what was the trajectory, velocity, and projectile forensics to prove so?


Answering my questions: https://www.redstate.com/sarah-rumpf...-steinle-case/

Lots of push on the gun and dangers of gun safety....because all those police NDs could only be caused by a defective firearm. /sarc

A bullet that ricochets still must be pointed in that same general direction, especially if the bullet remains intact and with energy to kill.

And before we have a long discussion about bullets ricocheting “straight back”, know this, the lead bullet didn’t ricochet/bounce "straight back" off the concrete or steel, the brass jacket does. (You can view this phenomena via high speed camera video)

And yeah, I’ve been hit with a full bullet “bouncing” off a steel belted “tire” in a shoot house, smarted a bit but didn’t have energy left to kill.

And that brass jacket doesn’t kill, the lead does. I’ve been hit dozens of time by pieces of brass jacket “bouncing” off steel straight back and I’ve heard of folks getting injured by the brass jacket, but not killed.

I’ve been hit numerous times and know of many others who have been hit by bullet fragments coming back from bullet traps both rubber and steel. Yep, it smarts but nothing worse than a bruise or small cut to the skin. ETA: and I’m talking distances of three to twenty yards.

I can’t remember but I thought she got hit (shot) in the head. Kinda makes for a high angle ricochet and an improbable killing velocity. Would like to see the forensic evidence gathered to support the defense.

[QUOTE=Team Sergeant;636080]A bullet that ricochets ....QUOTE]

This is what I was getting at. I agree for the most part. I disagree in that I think it is not impossible to kill with a jacket ricochet. It must depend on where the hit is, energy, and how it threatens the vitals of the body.

I know first hand of a competition incident where a jacket penetrated the shooter that had a surprising amount of penetration. It was surgically removed at the hospital. It was about a third of a 9mm jacket that ricocheted off of steel at 20 meters. Everything seems it should not have happened with that kind of energy and distance, including the angle of the steel. If it had hit the neck, it could have created a fatal situation. (PSA: Always wear eyepro!)

I do recall an IDPA incident of a ricochet hitting the neck of a safety that required hospitalization....I will have to look for the source. May have been reported on TFB or one of those sites. There was a YouTube video of the incident.

I know there was a case in England of a stray lead pellet rifle pellet killing a woman by lodging in her neck. I do not know all the detail of that, but it was small and not very high velocity. It was a tragic freak accident, took place at the old home of Pink Floyds recording studio, by a new family that purchased the home from them.

I wonder in this case the evidence of the projectile. I also wonder if the weapon still contained the BLM rounds in the magazine. .165 JHP .40. What makes them certain the projectile that killed her was indeed a ricochet?

Its all armchair at this point, it could have really been an accident and or she really was killed by a ricochet. Its tragic and terrible no matter the conclusion.

The above is just IMO. I am not a ballistic or medical expert. I have some related professional experience to draw my conclusions or rather, my questions.