![]() |
Left behind?
|
A very tragic story if proven true.
I remember reading about this incident in several different books. Including Roberts Ridge. The commentary and recollection was that the UAV feed was very confusing to understand whom was who and what exactly was going on. I seem to remember there was several discussions that when his body was finally recovered, there was a lot of questions about how it got there. There was dismissive claims that it was dragged there. But also that he was already dead, and his "Ghost" fought back. Then finally, that he had survived and fought for awhile, after being left. Sounds like the entire situation was as bad as it gets. Only those that were there will really ever know. If something wrong did happen, hopefully that gets exposed. If not the case, may they rest in peace living and dead. Prayers and support to those who lost loved ones. May they all be remembered. |
Terrible tactics...
What happened on that ridge has been debated for a while. I was not there, so I'm not going to add uninformed conclusions to the debate. But, I will say this, it makes zero sense to take an OP by force by landing your big, noisy, aircraft right on top of it. And, to think that the SEALs were part of a recon team whose leadership should have known better. Sound tactics at the beginning of this operation would have avoided this whole mess.
It's the same with the "Lone Survivor" SEALs. This is their PACE plan for commo: P- AN/PRC-148 (to communicate from a freaking mountainous ridge to the only support they have) A- Sat Phone (Seriously?) C- None E- None Again, just terrible TTPs leading to good men suffering and dying. |
Quote:
The reason SF never does high speed shit in combat is that we're always planning sensible missions! What's wrong with us? |
1 Attachment(s)
Many poignant lessons were taken away from ANACONDA, the Roberts Ridge (Takur Ghar) incident and subsequent actions. Command and Control, remote operations in mountainous terrain, CAS, Targeting, etc... While my perspective is from the outside observing what was made public, reading between the lines many folks including members on this board have worked hard to process those lessons to improve similar operations. With many mountain operations inherent indigenous factors add complex challenges due to terrain and general conditions.
Someone familiar with the the timeline and actions would be able to comment regarding the following account as it is an from 2011: http://www.combatreform.org/realmountaindivision.htm Takur Ghar after the snow melt... |
/\ /\ /\ hitting the "like" button
|
Quote:
What amazes me most about this whole affair is that if they had a drone that could capture the battle (rescue) down to who's who, why was the LZ recon so f'd up before inserting the team directly into a shit sammich. Those decisions come down rather than up and yet the people at CJSOTF blame a Sr. Chief for the actions on the ground. I'm not going to knock the SEALs as this would have been the same results for any unit tasked with this mission. Rest in peace to the fallen and to those that carry the memories of that day. As far as whether congress and the president approve the MOH for TSGT Chapman's actions after being left for dead in a heated gun fight that's up to them. Many more living and dead have bravely fought above and beyond and have been awarded medals undeserving of their sacrifice. If this is only about the Air Force feeling left out of the medals ceremony, cry me a river; this isn't the Olympics. TSGT John Chapman and all who died on that mountain didn't give all for medals. |
Quote:
I find this amusing, in a scary way. All of our land warfare capabilities are essentially the same as the end of the Cold War, and we have deactivated or reduced a number of the more useful ones (like cluster munitions). Meanwhile, they've studied the shit out of us and have adapted their gear and doctrine specifically to counter us. We're overly focused on chasing bronze age guys around mud huts. I'd say with a good deal of certainty that Russia/China are much more prepared to fight us today than we are prepared to fight them. |
Quote:
|
And the reason we would fight a land war in China would be?
Not saying that I don't agree with the sentiments of this thread and that we need to pay more attention to our heavy armored forces. Not for Asia, but for Europe. |
Quote:
...hopefully that's because we're saving the real deal for the real deal. Likewise, I do not share 110% of advanced marksmanship stuff with these guys like I do with our SOF/LEO |
Quote:
Having said that I will also say basic patrolling/ambush skills are the same as advanced patrolling/ambush skills...exactly, just executed at a level of instinct. The basics executed instinctively is what warriorship is all about. There are no double secret probation ambush skills....just the basics executed at a level of automation and instinctive reaction combined with control (trigger) and mental focus that allows immediate killing with no excess moves or thought. Think about that. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21. |
Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®