National Review is Against Trump
 

They won't support Cruz either. ;) Let Trump draw fire that would be aimed at Cruz otherwise.

(I'm hopping that there is a Palin Gambit being played. ;))

Pat

Political Opportunist -- meet Donald Trump!
 

Two words of the article pretty much sums it up -- "political opportunist". I'm reminded of the story of the Emperor's New Clothes. I just wonder when people are going to wake up and perceive the 'naked' truth about Donald Trump. He's a buffoon, a bully, and a jerk. The article properly singled out that on several occasions he has advanced positions relative to our adversaries in the Middle East that are, on their face, war crimes.

Obviously, I agree wholeheartedly with this review and will continue to support reasonable Republicans who exhibit common sense and logical assessment of the issues and their resolution.

Just my $0.02.

.

I will vote for whomever the Republicans nominate.

Hopefully, Hillary will be under indictment in a month or two and out of the picture. If she is not indicted, the FBI will lose all credibility. The Dems will have either Biden or Bernie as their candidate. Lets hope the Republicans don't implode and lose the Whitehouse. There will be at least three new Supreme Court Justices appointed over the next term. If they aren't conservatives, the country may be damaged beyond repair.

New Federal Judge supported by 13 GOP Senators: Wilhelmina Wright.

She's rumored to be on a fast track to The SCOTUS.

We must repeal the 17th Amendment. The states need to regain control of their Senators.

Pat

If Trump doesn't get the nomination, I wonder if he has the financial clout and enough history of back room dealings with figures in power to exact a little revenge on one or both sides?

Whether or not he is elected, I am excited to see him (and Cruz for that matter) shaking up the GOP the way they are.

HRC's a loser. Trump's a winner. That's how it should play out.

^^^^^I would STRONGLY recommend that you look into Trump's actions / behavior instead of what he is saying. He is no conservative.

Oh, I know, Sir.
I'm just saying he's a winner; has a history of it.
Clinton has a history of losing, and she'll lose again.
That's the point I'm trying to make.

Conservative Review has a good summary of Trump:

https://www.conservativereview.com/2...s/donald-trump

It was previously linked to here:

http://professionalsoldiers.com/foru...8&postcount=70

Trump's a good businessman. It'll help. He's got clangers, too.
I realize the Evangelicals will flock away from the polls because he owns a casino, but I don't want to feel the bern, personally. Nor do I want to live through another few years of Marxist leadership.

I feel that Trump would, repeal many of Obamas executive orders, be strong on defense, strong on foreign policy and enogh of a wild-card to give others on the world stage a pause , good for business, smart enough not to go after people's guns, and with a big enough ego to want to be considerd "successful" by history, and enough personal wealth to give the entrenched establishment the big one finger salute and continue to be a de-stabilizing force to the status quo.

I also think that he is riding a wave now... and can't see how he would be any less electable than ted cruz.

I disagree - as far as him having balls.

Trump is the kid on the playground who's bigger than everyone - so everyone backs down. Being ham fisted and loud doesn't necessarily mean strength - to me at least.

I'd rather vote for an actual conservative - not a media creation whose biggest strength seems to be his opportunism.

She should have already been indicted .... There has to be enormous pressure at the top to delay, delay, delay. Probably until, as one of his last acts in office, Obama pardons her. I wish I could say that it might turn out otherwise. She deserves to go to jail ....

.

Yep, and I guarantee that Trump is not going to appoint conservatives.