![]() |
.338 NM Lightweight Medium Machine Gun (LWMMG)
1 Attachment(s)
New toy??
Quote:
|
That's going to leave a mark.......:munchin
|
I have seen what a 300gr SMK does. I hit an antelope at 500 yards last year with my .338 Lapua. When I opened it up to field dress it, everything in the upper chest cavity looked like cherry jello...
|
That's a gun I'd want to be behind. :cool:
|
Ammo is heavy stuff to carry. :lifter
|
Interesting concept. I've wondered about a .300 or .338 mag MMG for a while.
Bob's right about ammo weight. The Swedes had a cartridge sort of along this lines for a long time. They built a few other guns for it but mostly they had it in Browning MGs. It was 7.92mm x 63mm but the "63" doesn't mean it was a necked-up .30-06. It was a rebated cartridge with a ton of volume. http://8x63swedish.pridham.ca/cartridge_drawing.jpg They adopted it specifically because their rifle cartridge, 6.5 x 55, was at the low end of "full-power" battle rifle rounds, and they wanted more oomph from their MGs. They were limited to the case and OAL length they used because they didn't feel like completely redesigning the Browning. The Swedes used it in a water cooled MG. It was basically their version of the M1917 Browning. I've often thought that we need liquid cooled weapons for vehicles and point defense. An air cooled gun doesn't support sustained fire like the defenders needed at Wanat, for example. |
Quote:
And in the case of this ammo, going from about $.60 per round to more like $5.00 per round. In a time of decreasing budgets, I would rather have proficient 7.62 gunners than .338 NM gunners who get 100 rounds each once per year. TR |
Quote:
TS - Maybe even some soft tissue bruises for the gunner. :D |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:48. |
Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®