Professional Soldiers ®

Professional Soldiers ® (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Discussions (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=46)
-   -   USN Switch To Biofuels @ 4 Times The Cost of Oil (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36080)

Richard 12-05-2011 20:46

USN Switch To Biofuels @ 4 Times The Cost of Oil
 
What budget crisis?

Our tax dollars at work... :confused:

Navy’s Big Biofuel Bet: 450,000 Gallons at 4 Times the Price of Oil
Wired, 5 Dec 2011

The Navy just signed deals to buy 450,000 gallons of biofuels — arguably the biggest purchase of its kind in U.S. government history. The purchase is a significant step for Navy Secretary Ray Mabus’ plans to transform the service into an energy-efficient fleet. But at approximately $15 per gallon — nearly four times the price of traditional fuel — the new fuels won’t come cheap.

(Cont'd) http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/12/navy-biofuels/

And so it effin' goes...

Richard
:munchin

Sarski 12-05-2011 21:36

It's "energy efficient" because now the fleet can travel one fourth the distance at four times the cost.

On a different note, I wonder which of our esteemed leaders stock portfolios are on the rise after this money maker of a sale to the US Navy.:rolleyes:

sinjefe 12-05-2011 21:43

We are doomed.:(

Ambush Master 12-05-2011 22:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarski (Post 426939)
It's "energy efficient" because now the fleet can travel one fourth the distance at four times the cost.

On a different note, I wonder which of our esteemed leaders stock portfolios are on the rise after this money maker of a sale to the US Navy.:rolleyes:

I'd place a wager on Al Gore!!!

rdret1 12-06-2011 09:04

I was always under the impression that biofuels were meant to be CHEAPER alternatives to regular petroleum based fuels.

mark46th 12-06-2011 09:23

Yes, more expensive. But it makes you feel sooooo much better....

Badger52 12-06-2011 10:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdret1 (Post 426968)
I was always under the impression that biofuels were meant to be CHEAPER alternatives to regular petroleum based fuels.

I don't think you missed anything sir, they were. Depends on which side of the subsidy you're on. Just ask the cornbelt if they'd like to hear someone declare ethanol didn't quite work out like "they" planned. Oops, I forgot that's the IA caucuses' third-rail.
:cool:

BOfH 12-06-2011 16:36

They have to buy because they don't have that of their own to recycle, their bacon grease is used elsewhere :eek: :p

Roguish Lawyer 12-06-2011 16:52

The Navy is going green! It's just another Solyndra, calm down. These people know what they're doing. :rolleyes:

Buffalobob 12-06-2011 16:52

We should just import more oil from other nations.

Golf1echo 12-06-2011 17:41

http://www.wired.com/autopia/2011/11...rning-biofuel/
Here is an article on a current bio fuel experiment Alaska Air was doing, of special interest is the cost, way higher than regular aviation fuel. In the future they expect aviation fuel to be much more and bio fuel less as it develops, I suppose it is good they are all looking to the future? The other aspect, as mentioned above is emissions, also dependency.

PSM 12-06-2011 18:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buffalobob (Post 427019)
We should just import more oil from other nations.

We should drill for the oil under the Oklahoma land that my sister and I own the mineral rights on. :mad:

Pat


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:17.


Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®