Professional Soldiers ®

Professional Soldiers ® (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Early Bird (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=45)
-   -   777 Crash In Ukraine (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=46468)

Richard 07-17-2014 09:55

777 Crash In Ukraine
 
Air Malaysia just had a 777 enroute from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur go down in Ukraine. :eek:

Accident or accidental shoot down?

Richard

mojaveman 07-17-2014 10:04

I'll bet on a missile strike. ;)

Lan 07-17-2014 10:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brush Okie (Post 557245)
Or just a shoot down. Anyone remember flight 007? good pretense for an invasion ie Ukraine is shooting down civilian jet liners and targeting civilians.

This was my first thought as well. Did Russia do it?

rubberneck 07-17-2014 10:33

Reports are that it was hit by a BUK surface to air missile fired from inside Russian territory. This is going to get ugly really quickly if true. Prayers out to the deceased.

The Reaper 07-17-2014 12:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brush Okie (Post 557254)
So my question is why some jack ass CEO made the decision to let civilian airline full of their passengers fly over a combat zone? I realize it would cost more in fuel to route around but anyone that didn't see this coming is an idiot.

It's the Malaysians.

I don't think any further explanation for the routing is required.

Remember, these are the people who let the rest of the world search for weeks for their lost airplane while they withheld information on its possible location.

As far as the SAM shooting, it was either the Ukranian government, which I would say is very unlikely, the Ukranian separatists, who initially claimed credit for the downing, and now deny it, or most likely, IMHO, the Russians shot it down in support of the "separatists".

A BUK requires armored TELs and radars to employ, it isn't a shoulder fired missile that might be hidden.

TR

PSM 07-17-2014 14:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brush Okie (Post 557254)
So my question is why some jack ass CEO made the decision to let civilian airline full of their passengers fly over a combat zone? I realize it would cost more in fuel to route around but anyone that didn't see this coming is an idiot.

The airspace was not restricted at the time. The FIR has been closed now, though.

Pat

ddoering 07-17-2014 14:40

This will certainly take the media's attention away from the IRS scandal......

PSM 07-17-2014 14:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brush Okie (Post 557261)
Restricted or not enough stuff happening there common sense dictates avoid the area. I would like to go to Kiev and look around due to the history there. If given an all expense paid vacation I would avoid the place at the moment. Just poor SA but like was pointed out it was the Malaysians so enough said about common sense.

Oh I agree. But remember, those airways are a marketable commodity and the Ukranians have probably been busy promising that the airspace is safe. I doubt the Malaysians were the only airline using those airways.

Pat

Richard 07-17-2014 15:15

This may be a negotiated rerouting of the air corridor over the Crimea which was closed in April and over the Middle East due to the on-going situation there.

http://www.airlineroutemaps.com/maps/Malaysia_Airlines

Only so much airspace out there and lots of potential hazards to navigate.

Richard

Roguish Lawyer 07-17-2014 15:40

Jester says it was the Russians

https://twitter.com/th3j35t3r/status/489851558935265280

Old Dog New Trick 07-17-2014 16:08

Only one question needs to be asked and answered.

Q. Who gains from this?

Certainly not the Pro-Russian rebels in Eastern Ukraine. Even if they recovered an SA-11 BUK from the Ukrainian Army why shoot down an unidentified high altitude aircraft? An "accident" like this kills any hope of success.

Ukraine - possible, it brings in NATO/EU/US support to win the conflict and secure the airspace to pound the crap out of the rebel forces without the continued Russian Air Force support. Anything more is an escalation of East/West involvement.

Russia - possible, it forces the airspace to move north and south back over Russian controlled airspace. Clearly a win-win for Russia. Otherwise it's a dumbass move to continue support for Eastern Ukraine - unlikely!

The party that benefits the most "if intentional" is Ukraine. They have the capability and the weapon system used. (They were also first to cast a stone and supposedly provide "proof" of pro-Russian separatist envolvment.)

My bet is on Ukraine to purposely shoot down this particular airline. Don't have look further than the passenger manifest and the owner of the plane.

JMO

The Reaper 07-17-2014 16:18

Point of origin for the shot is deep in separatist controlled territory. Hard for the Ukraine military to move a convoy of armored launchers in there undetected. Especially when the separatists already shot down another aircraft at high altitude three days ago with the same missile system, and the media observed one being operated by separatists in the area of the shootdown earlier today.

I think the separatists got out of control, or the Russians supporting them did.

Or the POTUS needed a diversion from the illegal immigrants.

TR

Roguish Lawyer 07-17-2014 16:26

Isn't it "separatists"? :munchin

Old Dog New Trick 07-17-2014 16:52

TR - I hear you, but we are clearly only being fed what some people want to feed us. I'm really suspect of the Crysler building on the Potomic having launch coordinates within hours but then backtracking shortly after saying they are now not sure the missile came from Russian territory.

I would suspect that an SA-11/17 with a vertical 70k' ceiling (nearly twice what was needed) and radar controlled could go horizontal nearly 24-natical miles makes a big circle.

Again MOO but who gains and who loses?

Old Dog New Trick 07-17-2014 17:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brush Okie (Post 557273)
Or the Russians blame Ukrainians and use it as a pretense for invasion

Or Russians use it as an excuse to show things are getting out of control and roll in to "keep the peace" like Christmas day 1979.

The problem being with today's technology not as easy to get away with that little trick and it did not go as planned.

All possible. But why cast doubt?

Why not shoot down an Aeroflot commercial plane? (Control all the variables!)

Richard 07-17-2014 17:01

S**t can happen when everyone's on edge...even when you have the best equipment, solid C3I, and disciplined forces - look at what happened to the Iran Air Airbus A300. And I suspect C3I is a fluctuating concept along the somewhat nebulous Russian-Ukranian border regions right now.

Richard

Old Dog New Trick 07-17-2014 17:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard (Post 557275)
S**t can happen when everyone's on edge...even when you have the best equipment, solid C3I, and disciplined forces - look at what happened to the Iran Air Airbus A300. And I suspect C3I is a fluctuating concept along the somewhat nebulous Russian-Ukranian border regions right now.

Richard

Richard, agreed! Chaos breeds confusion but this would be a colossal mistake and a tactical blunder to launch a golden BB into a commercial air cooridor in hopes of downing a legitimate military target.

I remember the IranAir shoot down and whether it was intentional by Iran or not to provoke the US Navy, the results and world opinion was accomplished.

How do you change world opinion? Shoot down a commercial airplane filled with kids on holiday.

Detonics 07-17-2014 17:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by mojaveman (Post 557243)
I'll bet on a missile strike. ;)

Nah, it'll turn out to be wires arcing in the fuel cell....:rolleyes:

LarryW 07-17-2014 17:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard (Post 557275)
S**t can happen when everyone's on edge...even when you have the best equipment, solid C3I, and disciplined forces - look at what happened to the Iran Air Airbus A300. And I suspect C3I is a fluctuating concept along the somewhat nebulous Russian-Ukranian border regions right now.

Richard

The C3I question is important to weigh when trying to determine who made the decisions to fire on the aircraft. C2 in that environment is probably very centralized, and because of that its hard to imagine that a BUK SAM resource would be managed by 4 brigand separatists. Someone well above the paygrade in that SAM vehicle was probably the person who made the call. The more sophisticated C2 of Russia (or RU supported forward deployed forces) IMHO is more suspect.

Richard 07-17-2014 18:10

This is what the Ukranian Security Services are offering in their social media releases - "Kazaks from the Chernukhino checkpoint".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnuHxAR01Jo

Richard

PSM 07-17-2014 18:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detonics (Post 557280)
Nah, it'll turn out to be wires arcing in the fuel cell....:rolleyes:

Today is the 18th anniversary of that event.

BTW, I believe the NTSB got it right.

Pat

echoes 07-17-2014 18:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Reaper (Post 557269)
I think the separatists got out of control, or the Russians supporting them did.

Or the POTUS needed a diversion from the illegal immigrants.

TR

TR Sir,

Your words speak volumes towards the exact same sentiment around here from folks...

Very well said IMHO. It is a tragedy.

Holly

Ambush Master 07-17-2014 18:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Reaper (Post 557255)
A BUK requires armored TELs and radars to employ, it isn't a shoulder fired missile that might be hidden.

TR

A Man-Pad can't even get a "Target-Lock" on something above 10K' Max, much less have enough Propellant to boost it that far. To get that high, it has to be the size of a Telephone Pole!!

The Reaper 07-17-2014 19:57

I wonder if President Obama is happy with his buddy Vlad right now:

"This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility."

Flexible enough to keep on his fundraising tour and ignore the State sanctioned murders of nearly 300 people?

The ends justify the means, eh tovarisch?

TR

Sdiver 07-17-2014 21:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Reaper (Post 557290)
I wonder if President Obama is happy with his buddy Vlad right now:

"This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility."

Flexible enough to keep on his fundraising tour and ignore the State sanctioned murders of nearly 300 people?

The ends justify the means, eh tovarisch?

TR

Oh Barry's probably doing a serious "Happy Dance" over this.

Takes the focus off his latest scandal.

Which one is it again ????

Oh yeah ... something about illegal immigrants flooding/invading our southern boarder.

Tree Potato 07-17-2014 22:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brush Okie (Post 557254)
So my question is why some jack ass CEO made the decision to let civilian airline full of their passengers fly over a combat zone? I realize it would cost more in fuel to route around but anyone that didn't see this coming is an idiot.

Granted, it was a Malaysian flight, but... our FAA advised US carriers to exercise extreme caution in the area back in April; the NOTAM is valid until April 2015.

http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publi...RAINE_SFAR.pdf

Quote:

F. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS (NOT INCLUDED IN SFAR 113).
U.S. OPERATORS AND AIRMEN FLYING INTO, OUT OF, WITHIN, OR TRANSITING
LVOV (UKLV), KYIV(UKBV), DNEPROPETROVSK (UKDV), AND ODESSA (UKOV)
FIRS, AS WELL AS AIRSPACE IN THE SIMFEROPOL (UKFV) FIR THAT IS OUTSIDE
THE LATERAL LIMITS OF SFAR 113 AIRSPACE DESCRIBED ABOVE, MUST
REVIEW CURRENT SECURITY/THREAT INFORMATION AND NOTAMS; COMPLY
WITH ALL APPLICABLE FAA REGULATIONS, OPERATIONS SPECIFICATIONS,
MANAGEMENT SPECIFICATIONS, AND LETTERS OF AUTHORIZATION,
INCLUDING UPDATING B450; AND EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION DUE TO THE
CONTINUING POTENTIAL FOR INSTABILITY. U.S. OPERATORS MUST REPORT
SAFETY AND/OR SECURITY INCIDENTS TO THE FAA

Richard 07-18-2014 08:15

The corridor being used by the Malaysian Airlines flight was outside the warning areas and 15 of 16 East Asian airlines were currently using it. Not now.

http://news.yahoo.com/why-airlines-d...--finance.html

Richard

Snaquebite 07-18-2014 09:09

POTUS: Hey Vlad...I need some help. They're beating me up over this immigration problem and all kinds of other things. Think you can help me out?
PUTIN: Sure...Think a plane being shot down will create enough diversion? We can talk about what you will owe me later.
POTUS: Damn....Great idea...get back to me when you figure out what you need in return.

1stindoor 07-18-2014 10:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sdiver (Post 557293)
Oh Barry's probably doing a serious "Happy Dance" over this.

Takes the focus off his latest scandal.

Which one is it again ????

Oh yeah ... something about illegal immigrants flooding/invading our southern boarder.

You're close...
It was actually illegal immigrants flooding the IRS computers with claims for VA benefits for free healthcare being denied due to racism by conservative based TEA Party organizations. :D

Lan 07-18-2014 10:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaquebite (Post 557308)
POTUS: Hey Vlad...I need some help. They're beating me up over this immigration problem and all kinds of other things. Think you can help me out?
PUTIN: Sure...Think a plane being shot down will create enough diversion? We can talk about what you will owe me later.
POTUS: Damn....Great idea...get back to me when you figure out what you need in return.

*ring ring*
PUTIN: Yo! Bama.. Got it. Teach me everything you know about communism.

cbtengr 07-18-2014 12:27

The POTUS has vowed to get to the bottom of this. I do not know when he is going to find the time, he has such a long list of things to get to the bottom of.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:58.


Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®