Professional Soldiers ®

Professional Soldiers ® (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Early Bird (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=45)
-   -   Attorney in hijab defends call for other women at 9/11 hearing to wear 'appropriate' (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=37794)

Team Sergeant 05-06-2012 14:02

Attorney in hijab defends call for other women at 9/11 hearing to wear 'appropriate'
 
Even on trial the islamic terrorists attempt to make "us" bow to their desires.......



Published May 06, 2012
FoxNews.com

Attorney in hijab defends call for other women at 9/11 hearing to wear 'appropriate' clothing

The defense attorney who wore a traditional Islamic outfit during the rowdy arraignment of the accused Sept. 11 terrorists is defending her courtroom appeal that other women in the room wear more "appropriate" clothing to the proceedings -- out of respect for her client's Muslim beliefs.

Cheryl Bormann, counsel for defendant Walid bin Attash, attended the arraignment Saturday dressed in a hijab, apparently because her client insisted on it. She further requested that the court order other women to follow that example so that the defendants do not have to avert their eyes "for fear of committing a sin under their faith."



Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...#ixzz1u7azBoe5

longrange1947 05-06-2012 14:14

SEND IN THE DANCING GIRLS!!!!!! :D

Oldrotorhead 05-06-2012 14:17

Have none of the women "journalists" asked her to stop being an ass hole yet? Why haven't the Judges told this lawyer to stick to the subject in the front of the court room?:confused:

orion5 05-06-2012 14:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Team Sergeant (Post 447557)

Cheryl Bormann, counsel for defendant Walid bin Attash, attended the arraignment Saturday dressed in a hijab, apparently because her client insisted on it. She further requested that the court order other women to follow that example so that the defendants do not have to avert their eyes "for fear of committing a sin under their faith."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...#ixzz1u7azBoe5

I completely agree that the defendants should not have to avert their eyes. I fully support throwing a tarp over their heads.

alelks 05-06-2012 14:43

If I were the apposing attorney I would show up in a clown suit.

Why not?

They are making us look like clowns when we bow to them.

I'm just saying........

stfesta 05-06-2012 15:16

If I were the judge, I would order all women to wear Hooters uniforms and I would have catered BBQ pork sandwiches. Of course lunch would have to be blessed by a priest and a Rabbi.

The defendants would be my last priority.

Just my $0.02
sf

The Reaper 05-06-2012 15:29

The lawyer is an enabler.

Will the defendents be allowed to scold and beat her, if she fails to get them acquitted? How can a real Muslim man be represented by an infidel female?

I know the judge, he is not going to put up with much BS in his court.

TR

Dusty 05-06-2012 16:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Reaper (Post 447569)
How can a real Muslim man be represented by an infidel female?
TR

lol That's key.

Richard 05-06-2012 16:13

1 Attachment(s)
Approved attire in the Muslim world...why not? ;)

And so it goes...

Richard :munchin

Dusty 05-06-2012 17:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard (Post 447573)
Approved attire in the Muslim world...why not? ;)

And so it goes...

Richard :munchin

Islamoporn

SF_BHT 05-06-2012 19:16

Military court.

Lets make them shave, cut their hair and dress in a western suit.

Give them a taste of what they try to force on us.

greenberetTFS 05-07-2012 14:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by SF_BHT (Post 447582)
Military court.

Lets make them shave, cut their hair and dress in a western suit.

Give them a taste of what they try to force on us.

Right on...... :D After what they are responsible for doing,it really pisses me off the way we are catering to them........:mad: WTF is wrong with us,is this "PC for Terrorists Killers"?....:mad:

Big Teddy :munchin

neecheepure 05-07-2012 15:00

9/11 defense attorney wears hijab at hearing, wants others in court to dress more mod
 
Expletive!!! :mad:

http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/20...-modestly?lite

ETA: TS beat me to it!

The Reaper 05-07-2012 16:43

If looking at Western women causes them to lose their composure, how is that the woman's fault?

How about we just bag the assholes, and keep them that way till we execute them?

TR

BOfH 05-07-2012 17:10

She is from that liberal bastion of Cook County, IL a.k.a. Obama land. Who is Cheryl Bormann: http://freedomswingspolitics.com/201...heryl-bormann/

I wonder if there is any relation to a certain Martin Bormann? :eek:

lindy 05-07-2012 19:00

But it's halal to conceal data files sandwiched between porn on a SD card? :confused:

chance 05-07-2012 21:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by lindy (Post 447680)
But it's halal to conceal data files sandwiched between porn on a SD card? :confused:

That's where I hide mine, don't you?

ddoering 05-08-2012 05:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by SF_BHT (Post 447582)
Military court.

Lets make them shave, cut their hair and dress in a western suit.

Give them a taste of what they try to force on us.

Better yet, strap them and gag them ala Hannibal Lectur from Silence of the Lambs. That will make them pay attention.

Gypsy 05-08-2012 17:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by BOfH (Post 447670)
She is from that liberal bastion of Crook County, IL a.k.a. Obama land.

Fixed that for you.

Screw her.

BOfH 05-09-2012 13:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gypsy (Post 447810)
Fixed that for you.

Screw her.

Thanks Gypsy! ;)

s 05-09-2012 19:01

I should probably articulate more thoroughly, but I don't quiet think that Ms.Bormann's daring nonsense deserves more than a bag of popcorn and a heartfelt " hooooooly crap..." :munchin

Requiem 05-09-2012 20:02

Quote:

The court hearing for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his four co-defendants should have taken a couple of hours at most. Instead it lasted almost 13 hours, including meal and prayer breaks, as the men appeared to make a concerted effort to stall Saturday's hearing.

Earlier Saturday, Mohammed cast off his earphones providing Arabic translations of the proceeding and refused to answer Army Col. James Pohl's questions or acknowledge he understood them. All five men refused to participate in the hearing; two passed around a copy of The Economist magazine and leafed through the articles.
So... we should respect their stone-aged, feeble-willed sense of manhood, and yet they can't show some respect to those in the courtroom? They deserve nothing and yet we give them more consideration than most criminals in a court of law.

S.

Gypsy 05-10-2012 17:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brush Okie (Post 447984)
No thanks. I do have standards even if they are very low.

:D


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:35.


Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®