Professional Soldiers ®

Professional Soldiers ® (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Early Bird (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=45)
-   -   Black militia group wants to arrest Trayvon Martin shooter (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=37224)

Paslode 03-21-2012 07:44

Black militia group wants to arrest Trayvon Martin shooter
 
I am amazed with all the time and effort spent in the past few years conjuring up the Militia Demons that this group got missed.

Quote:

A spokeswoman for the Southern Poverty Law Center, a civil rights group that monitors hate groups, said her organization didn't have any information on The New Black Liberation Militia. The group describes itself on its website as "Developing and Teaching Spiritual, Psychological, Social, Holistic and Scientific Methods and Techniques to ensure the survival of black people in the 21st century and beyond."
http://www.thegrio.com/specials/tray...in-shooter.php


Base on the picture:

A New Black Panther Party member stands guard with "700 NBPP" tattooed on his face.. (credit: Sara D. Davis/Getty Images)

A New Black Panther Party member stands guard with “700 NBPP” tattooed on his face.., looks like King Samir Shabazz may be in it as well

http://tampa.cbslocal.com/2012/03/15...-watch-leader/


I wonder where Eric Holder stands on Vigilante Groups?

Dusty 03-21-2012 07:47

Dude, face it. If you're a Euro-American Judeo-Christian male, you're surrounded.

From what I've gathered about this incident so far, the shooter violated a cardinal rule; it's for the Courts to decide, of course.

Badger52 03-21-2012 07:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paslode (Post 441033)
I wonder where Eric Holder stands on Vigilante Groups?

Certainly you know that a "member of a traditionally disadvantaged class" can't be found guilty of stepping on a crack in the sidewalk.

Richard 03-21-2012 08:02

Typical grandstanding move for media attention. :rolleyes:

FWIW, that statement was 'news' from last week before the DOJ dusted off their Marshal's badges, strapped on their six-shooters, woke up Festus to watch the jail, and sashayed on out into the fray.

We'll be hearing about it all for a long time to come as it plays out in the MSM, the blogosphere, talk radio, and the justice system.

Richard :munchin

Xamine 03-21-2012 12:00

Interesting, but I could have sworn George Zimmerman was Hispanic... :rolleyes:

Pete 03-21-2012 13:03

Neighborhood Watch
 
When the Cops came to our Neighborhood Watch meetings they stressed we were not LEO's.

I was not there but he was doing neighborhood watch and he had a weapon and a phone.

From what I gather - the neighborhood was fairly nice - similar to mine - which has some less than nice areas within a couple of blocks.

Most unknown "visitors" will pick up the pace and stop looking left and right if you give them that little head nod "I see you" look.

We did have some teenagers a few years back who went through the neighborhood looking for unlocked cars - and they would take anything not nailed down. Spare change and CD's were hot items. They got caught in the act more than once but them buggers were fast and could hop fences with the best of them.

Oh, and I've heard the "kid" was 6'3".

Paslode 03-21-2012 13:47

This reminds of Tawana Brawley and the Duke lacrosse cases in that you have Rev. Al and Shabazz grabbing attention, coming to the aid of the 'victim', jumping to conclusions and condemning the fairer skinned person(s) involved without a day in court.

All good comments, all are on the mark.........but damn the hypocrisy really gets me!

Interesting as well that CBS would only put the left cheek of King Shabazz on their story....probably for fear that Homie Shabazz might be recognized as the 2008 NBBP Poll Thug.

Even more amazing the SPLC found tons of information on the Hutaree Group, enough to garner them name specific attention on the MIAC report......but they don't have any information on the NBLM.

Wow!

steel71 03-21-2012 16:09

Al Sharpton was all over it too, big surprise .:cool:

Kyobanim 03-21-2012 17:46

According to his neighbor there have been 7 B&Es over the last year the whole neighborhood is fed up with it.

This is another of those things that the internet is good for; convicting someone before they are even charged with a crime. No one knows the circumstances involved here. How about waiting until all the facts are properly gathered. You know, that little thing called evidence?

CSB 03-21-2012 18:20

But that tattoo on the face...
really makes life easy on law enforcement
officers.
Can't wait to see it on a mug shot.

steel71 03-21-2012 19:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyobanim (Post 441168)
According to his neighbor there have been 7 B&Es over the last year the whole neighborhood is fed up with it.

This is another of those things that the internet is good for; convicting someone before they are even charged with a crime. No one knows the circumstances involved here. How about waiting until all the facts are properly gathered. You know, that little thing called evidence?

Like the Duke rape case? Those guys never got an apology from the media, or the so called civil rights leaders.

longrange1947 03-21-2012 21:54

My bet is two guys with attitudes butting heads and playing my dick is bigger got out of hand and Zimmerman panicked.

However, that is a wild a**ed guess and means nothing until, as has been mentioned, the evidence is in and sorted, cataloged, and EVALUATED.

Sigaba 03-22-2012 04:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paslode (Post 441033)
I wonder where Eric Holder stands on Vigilante Groups?

Contact information for the Office of the Attorney General is:

U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

(202) 514-2001

askdoj@usdoj.gov

Facebook

Twitter

DoJOIP/FOIA requests.

#HTH

Pete 03-22-2012 06:09

Who thinks the shooter was "white"?
 
Zimmerman was on the ground being punched when he shot Trayvon Martin

Continue reading on Examiner.com Zimmerman was on the ground being punched when he shot Trayvon Martin - Charleston Charleston Conservative | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/charleston-c...#ixzz1pqYqloFm

"..............Literally thousands of articles contain at least one false statement in the first couple of lines. They usually read "George ZImmerman, a white man," or "shoot by a white man." Zimmerman is described by family as a multiracial Hispanic. His appearance is clearly that of a Latino/Mestizo individual. However, the media wants him to be white because that better fits the political narrative they are trying to artificially create. Many news articles have also claimed the neighborhood is "mostly white." This is also a lie. The neighborhood is only 49% white. It is over half non-white.................."

Paslode 03-22-2012 06:28

No need for a court system...


Quote:

Reporting from Sanford, Fla.—

In a tense meeting Wednesday that highlighted growing tensions over the shooting death of an unarmed black teenager, local officials in Sanford, Fla., passed a vote of no confidence in the police chief as protests spread north to New York City, where the slain youth’s parents joined a Manhattan march demanding the killer’s arrest.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/n...,4163905.story


And from MSNBC's Judge Lawrence O'Donnell

Quote:

"Legally, those two words ... it seems to me constitute obvious evidence of hateful intent. This is a racial slur that you're hearing him say minutes, seconds possibly, before he shoots a black teenager to death for doing nothing."
Quote:

"I've studied police cover-ups in the past," he said. "...I believe that what we have here is evidence of a police cover-up...that local police department never wanted anyone to hear those two words."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1369414.html


And of course this happened because of lax gun laws.......at least according to Bloomberg

Quote:

Trayvon Martin Shooting Shows Perils of Lax U.S. Gun Laws

By the Editors - Mar 20, 2012

The Justice Department opened an investigation this week into the killing of Trayvon Martin, a 17-year-old high school student who was shot dead on Feb. 26 in Sanford, Florida.

Martin was returning to the home of his father’s girlfriend from a 7-Eleven, armed with a package of Skittles and an iced tea, when he was killed. George Zimmerman -- a self-appointed neighborhood watch captain, according to news reports -- had called 911 and proceeded to follow Martin, even after the dispatcher advised him not to. Soon after, Zimmerman told police, he shot Martin.

Crime is a problem in the U.S. So are guns. According to the local police chief, Zimmerman, 28, had a permit for a concealed weapon, which is easily obtained in Florida. He also had a penchant for calling the police, having made 46 such calls in the past 13 months to report suspicious behavior. Based on news reports, it appears that Zimmerman believed he had much to fear from crime. As things turned out, Martin had much more to fear from Zimmerman’s gun.

Martin didn’t have a lot of protection from the law, either. Florida’s “Stand your Ground” law allows people to use deadly force -- even before an unarmed person -- provided they “reasonably believe” it’s necessary to defend themselves. It’s a shockingly low standard, but it’s not inconsistent with the highest law of the land.
Scalia’s Opinion

Writing for a bitterly divided Supreme Court in 2008, Justice Antonin Scalia brushed past the ambiguous language of the Second Amendment and the convoluted history of gun rights in the U.S. to establish or affirm (depending on your point of view) a right of individuals to own guns. Yet in his 5-4 opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller, even Scalia maintained that the right is not unlimited. “We do not read the Second Amendment to protect the right of citizens to carry arms for any sort of confrontation,” Scalia wrote.

The question, then, is what public policies are constitutionally justified to prevent the wrong “sort of confrontation”?

At present, it seems, not many. Since the Heller decision, which overturned Washington’s strict gun law, controls have been crumbling across the nation. In Oklahoma, lawmakers appear poised to enact an “open carry” law, allowing residents to display firearms in public. The National Rifle Association and other lobbyists for gun manufacturers are pushing for loaded guns to be allowed in college classrooms and dormitories. Legislation proposed in Congress would force states to allow holders of concealed weapons permits from other jurisdictions to carry guns where it’s otherwise illegal.
Dissolution of Order

A ruling this month in Maryland seems emblematic of the dissolution of order. U.S. District Judge Benson Everett Legg overturned a state law requiring that residents show a “good and substantial reason” to carry a gun on the grounds that such a standard was unconstitutional.

Activists are now insisting that race played a role in Martin’s death. Perhaps it did. (In a recording of Zimmerman’s 911 call, it sounds as if Zimmerman mutters a racial epithet.) On Tuesday, the state attorney’s office for Brevard and Seminole counties announced that a grand jury would investigate the shooting.

A racial motivation would push the case toward criminal terrain, and justly so. But racism is not the only way a mind can be distorted and its judgment impaired. There is nothing in Florida law, for example, to prevent people whose perceptions are distorted by fear from owning a gun -- or an arsenal of them -- and carrying a concealed and loaded weapon on the street.

This is one obvious flaw in the mad rush to arm America, which we hope statehouses, courts and Congress will belatedly factor into their thinking. Guns ever at the ready will be used, with tragic results.

But there is this contrary opinion to the Bloomberg opinion back with some data about the decline Florida crime

Quote:

Florida passed "must-issue" concealed carry in 1987 in response to a boom in crime in Florida during the 1980s. Critics said that this law would lead to a "shooting gallery" and drive crimes through the roof.

What has happened to both crime and violent crime since? Violent crime has dropped from 1,220.9 per 100,000 in 1990 to 542.9 in 2010, a drop of more than half. (2011 numbers are not yet out.)
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=203672

BOfH 03-22-2012 09:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paslode (Post 441221)
No need for a court system...

Ah yes, the MSM version of "shoot first, ask questions later", of course when they do it, it's all good :mad:


Quote:

Originally Posted by Paslode (Post 441221)
And of course this happened because of lax gun laws.......at least according to Bloomberg

MSM whoring for Bloomberg's MAIG, what a surprise.

kgoerz 03-22-2012 15:42

Stand your ground law or not. Your life needs to be threatened in order to use deadly force. The Kid had a Soda Pop bottle, the other guy had a Gun.
It might answer a lot of questions knowing if it was a contact shot or not. Unless they were fighting for the gun. I can't see this as a good shoot.
Imagine if that were your kid that was shot by some over zealous neighborhood watch guy. He didn't stand his ground. He followed the kid after being told not to by the 911 dispatch.

PedOncoDoc 03-22-2012 15:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by kgoerz (Post 441299)
Stand your ground law or not. Your life needs to be threatened in order to use deadly force. The Kid had a Soda Pop bottle, the other guy had a Gun.
It might answer a lot of questions knowing if it was a contact shot or not. Unless they were fighting for the gun. I can't see this as a good shoot.
Imagine if that were your kid that was shot by some over zealous neighborhood watch guy. He didn't stand his ground. He followed the kid after being told not to by the 911 dispatch.

Chasing down the kid after being told to not pursue is the key here, IMHO. He was not in danger, he chose to hunt the kid down and escalate the situation. This is a tragic killing and the media is taking a sad situation and making it worse. The shooter does need to be arrested and given due process, but I don't see how he can be found innocent given the fact that he chased down a kid who was actively trying to avoid him.

Pete 03-22-2012 16:10

Conflicting news accounts
 
There appear to be conflicting news accounts floating around out there.

The stated timeline - Z's story - appears to be along the lines of Z was following the "kid" - 6'3" football player - while he talked with 911. He was told to break it off and return to his car, which he did. The "kid" followed him back to his car where the contact occured. One witness states Z was on his back and being pummeled by the victim. Z had grass stains on his back and bruising to his face.

Did both have the right to be walking around the neighborhood? Yes. Does one person have the right to be walking in the same direction as another while talking on a cell phone? Yes.

Also there is a story reporting the "kid" was serving a 5 day suspension from school. Wonder what that was for? Just wondering because Z appears to have had a run in with the law way back in his past.

"........but I don't see how he can be found innocent given the fact that he chased down a kid who was actively trying to avoid him..........."

Doc where did you get "chased down"? Some other sites are claiming Z was stalking the kid. Both had just as much right to be walking down the street as the other. If you're walking down a residential street what do you think if you turn around and see somebody walking the same way while talking on a cell phone? Do you start running, dodging or just keep walking?

And by the way, people in my neighborhood have tried to chase down the little punks who were sneaking around stealing from cars and garages in our neighborhood - they were just too fast.
__________________

PedOncoDoc 03-22-2012 17:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete (Post 441303)
Doc where did you get "chased down"? Some other sites are claiming Z was stalking the kid. Both had just as much right to be walking down the street as the other. If you're walking down a residential street what do you think if you turn around and see somebody walking the same way while talking on a cell phone? Do you start running, dodging or just keep walking?

Pete - I was not aware of the report that Martin was pummelling Z. My statement was with regards to the report that Z called 911 and was told to break off pursuit and later confronted the kid. If the kid did in fact tell his girlfriend on the phone he was trying to lose Z (as was stated in the original reports), I had assumed (I acknowledge this is a flaw with my argument) that Martin would take a route that made a second chance meeting with Z highly unlikely. Since a second meeting did occur despite Martin's attempt to evade Z per the reports I had read, I concluded that Z must have been stalking/pursuing Martin.

Hopefully the facts will come into the open to give a clearer picture of what actually happened.

Paslode 03-22-2012 17:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete (Post 441303)
There appear to be conflicting news accounts floating around out there.

The stated timeline - Z's story - appears to be along the lines of Z was following the "kid" - 6'3" football player - while he talked with 911. He was told to break it off and return to his car, which he did. The "kid" followed him back to his car where the contact occured. One witness states Z was on his back and being pummeled by the victim. Z had grass stains on his back and bruising to his face.

Did both have the right to be walking around the neighborhood? Yes. Does one person have the right to be walking in the same direction as another while talking on a cell phone? Yes.

Also there is a story reporting the "kid" was serving a 5 day suspension from school. Wonder what that was for? Just wondering because Z appears to have had a run in with the law way back in his past.

"........but I don't see how he can be found innocent given the fact that he chased down a kid who was actively trying to avoid him..........."

Doc where did you get "chased down"? Some other sites are claiming Z was stalking the kid. Both had just as much right to be walking down the street as the other. If you're walking down a residential street what do you think if you turn around and see somebody walking the same way while talking on a cell phone? Do you start running, dodging or just keep walking?

And by the way, people in my neighborhood have tried to chase down the little punks who were sneaking around stealing from cars and garages in our neighborhood - they were just too fast.
__________________

Other than there was a confrontation, someone was shot and killed.....there are too many If's, Ands & Buts for anyone speculate or judge who was in the wrong.

Forensics should tell a good portion of the story of what the shooter did.

I am hoping the shooter followed proper CCH ROE so Sharpton and the Liberal media can eat crow once again.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sigaba (Post 441211)
Contact information for the Office of the Attorney General is:

U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

(202) 514-2001

askdoj@usdoj.gov

Facebook

Twitter

DoJOIP/FOIA requests.

#HTH

Your all right, even in your humor & sarcasm you provide wealth of information. :D

Pete 03-22-2012 17:23

And why evade?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PedOncoDoc (Post 441306)
...... If the kid did in fact tell his girlfriend on the phone he was trying to lose Z (as was stated in the original reports),........

Why would an innocent person walking down a street turn, see someone walking behind them talking on the phone need to lose them? This is not a walking while black situation - the neighborhood was only 49% white and Z was Hispanic.

Would not a person on neighborhood watch see somebody walking through their neighborhood start ducking & weaving think something suspicious was going on? Z did talk with 911 and was told to break off which he said he did.

The reports state the "Kid" was 6'2" or 6'3" depending on source and a football player. Z is reported to be 5'2". Hmmmmmm.

The Reaper 03-22-2012 18:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete (Post 441220)
Zimmerman was on the ground being punched when he shot Trayvon Martin

Continue reading on Examiner.com Zimmerman was on the ground being punched when he shot Trayvon Martin - Charleston Charleston Conservative | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/charleston-c...#ixzz1pqYqloFm

"..............Literally thousands of articles contain at least one false statement in the first couple of lines. They usually read "George ZImmerman, a white man," or "shoot by a white man." Zimmerman is described by family as a multiracial Hispanic. His appearance is clearly that of a Latino/Mestizo individual. However, the media wants him to be white because that better fits the political narrative they are trying to artificially create. Many news articles have also claimed the neighborhood is "mostly white." This is also a lie. The neighborhood is only 49% white. It is over half non-white.................."

No lie.

I thought Shephard Smith was trying to re-ignite the Rodney King riots in Orlando today.

All the time, I was wondering if I had slept through the trial somehow.

Way too much agitation and speculation here, setting the scene for post-trial violence if Zimmerman is tried and acquitted.

Plenty of time for punishment after the facts have been gathered. I recommend stopping with the assumptions and gathering facts from the media.

TR

kgoerz 03-22-2012 18:38

On another note. Even if this guy did everything right in shooting the kid. He is so Fu#%cked

Dusty 03-22-2012 19:10

Another lib double standard. That's like two in ten days that have been blown all out of proportion, right?

fng13 03-22-2012 19:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by kgoerz (Post 441323)
On another note. Even if this guy did everything right in shooting the kid. He is so Fu#%cked

Nailed it.

Even the conservative media has been blasting this guy all week. Daytime talk radio, nightly news, opinion shows etc.

Even if this turns out to be justifiable shoot, this guys days are numbered. The public has predominately already made up their minds so if police declare it a good shoot it will just be racism and cover ups.


I bet now he realizes that if you go around looking for trouble eventually you will find it.

plato 03-22-2012 19:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by kgoerz (Post 441323)
On another note. Even if this guy did everything right in shooting the kid. He is so Fu#%cked

No cheering section like the OJ acquittal?

The Reaper 03-22-2012 19:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by plato (Post 441330)
No cheering section like the OJ acquittal?

That was DIFFERENT!

TR

kgoerz 03-23-2012 05:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete (Post 441313)
Why would an innocent person walking down a street turn, see someone walking behind them talking on the phone need to lose them? This is not a walking while black situation - the neighborhood was only 49% white and Z was Hispanic.

Would not a person on neighborhood watch see somebody walking through their neighborhood start ducking & weaving think something suspicious was going on? Z did talk with 911 and was told to break off which he said he did.

The reports state the "Kid" was 6'2" or 6'3" depending on source and a football player. Z is reported to be 5'2". Hmmmmmm.

I know exactly what you mean. But a private Citizen can not detain another private Citizen for doing any of this. Sounds like he tried to do a Terry Stop. The guy who authored the Stand your Ground Law was talking last night. He said it clearly states "you can not approach someone, challenge someone creating a situation, then use the Stand Your Ground Law as a defense. He said the stand your ground law do's not even apply here.

Destrier 03-23-2012 05:42

If he broke off and returned to his vehicle like he stated, and the kid then followed and assaulted him. Then the stand your ground law would then apply wouldn't it? Since the kid would then be the aggressor.

Dusty 03-23-2012 06:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Reaper (Post 441334)
That was DIFFERENT!

TR

That's hilarious, but it's also the lynch pin (NPI) of one of the primary drastic problems we face in this Country.

Pete 03-23-2012 06:35

Was the "kid" ever detained?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kgoerz (Post 441360)
I know exactly what you mean. But a private Citizen can not detain another private Citizen for doing any of this. Sounds like he tried to do a Terry Stop. The guy who authored the Stand your Ground Law was talking last night. He said it clearly states "you can not approach someone, challenge someone creating a situation, then use the Stand Your Ground Law as a defense. He said the stand your ground law do's not even apply here.

Was the "kid" ever detained?

Is it against the law to walk up to somebody you don't know and ask what they are doing in the neighborhood? Damn, I've done the "Can I help you find where you're going" in my neighborhood just to get a closer look at somebody. Reason being we had a guy come home for lunch and find a stranger in his house - bad shot, he missed the perp and the cops never found him. Other than the kids at night checking cars around here the usual MO is to walk through the neighborhood during working hours, kick in somebody's front door and make off with what you can.

Is asking someone a question detaining them? If you try and ask a question and the person takes off wouldn't that be a little strange?

A lot of "facts" are being thrown around right now and the - if true - time line and locations are getting merged and folded in a lot of the stories out there right now.

Dusty 03-23-2012 08:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard (Post 441040)
Typical grandstanding move for media attention. :rolleyes:

FWIW, that statement was 'news' from last week before the DOJ dusted off their Marshal's badges, strapped on their six-shooters, woke up Festus to watch the jail, and sashayed on out into the fray.

We'll be hearing about it all for a long time to come as it plays out in the MSM, the blogosphere, talk radio, and the justice system.

Richard :munchin

http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/22/sh...e-of-violence/

steel71 03-23-2012 09:20

Obama is now pumping it up....;)

Obama: 'If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon'

"When I think about this boy, I think about my own kids," Obama said in Rose Garden remarks. "I think every parent in America should be able to understand why it is absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of this. And that everybody pull together."

"But my main message is to the parents of Trayvon Martin. You know, if I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon," Obama said. "All of us as Americans are going to take this with the seriousness it deserves."

"Obviously this is a tragedy. I can only imagine what these parents are going through," Obama said. "All of us have to do some soul searching to figure out how something like this has happened."

http://www.politico.com/politico44/2...on-118439.html

Dusty 03-23-2012 09:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by steel71 (Post 441384)
Obama is now pumping it up....;)

Obama: 'If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon'

"When I think about this boy, I think about my own kids," Obama said in Rose Garden remarks. "I think every parent in America should be able to understand why it is absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of this. And that everybody pull together."

"But my main message is to the parents of Trayvon Martin. You know, if I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon," Obama said. "All of us as Americans are going to take this with the seriousness it deserves."

"Obviously this is a tragedy. I can only imagine what these parents are going through," Obama said. "All of us have to do some soul searching to figure out how something like this has happened."

http://www.politico.com/politico44/2...on-118439.html

Yeah. :rolleyes: Somebody needs to do some serious soul searching to determine honestly whether he'd even be commenting on the crime if the victim were Euro-American.

Destrier 03-23-2012 09:59

He did not comment to my knowledge, on the white boy set on fire by two black boys.

However, he did refrain from leaping to make an accusation of guilt.

Guess someone learned something from the teachable beer moment.

Dusty 03-23-2012 09:59

lololol Case Closed: Limbaugh, Gingrich and Santorum Guilty
 
http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/22/sh...e-of-violence/

glebo 03-23-2012 10:51

The comment by Bled2003 makes ya wonder....good point..

Most "african-American" killings are done by other "african-Americans"....where's the rally for that????

Dusty 03-23-2012 10:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by glebo (Post 441395)
The comment by Bled2003 makes ya wonder....good point..

Most "african-American" killings are done by other "african-Americans"....where's the rally for that????

http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/race.cfm

Hand 03-23-2012 11:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dusty (Post 441396)

The last chart in the quoted link is quite interesting given the topic of conversation. Black on white crimes committed by strangers occur ~15% more frequently than white on black crimes.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:42.


Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®