That line would have to be pretty thick to garner support of any kind of widespread uprising/rebellion. I would wager it would take an overt, mass door-to-door gestapo style confiscation of arms to REALLY piss off enough Americans to fight back. Apparently the dissolution of the first amendment for some but not others, the constant attacks on the 2nd, so on and so forth have not been enough.

I'd like to know "who" is going to be doing the "confiscation".

If and when that "order" is given people will start dying en mass along with the idiot that gave the order.:munchin

Pretty simple I think. Most of the rookies at "name-that-agency", die hard liberal members that are already in those agencies, and just plain ole dumb asses that never think for themselves and just want that revenue stream to stay wet.

I'm not saying that everybody in a LE agency would follow those orders, but enough of them would to warrant resistance. Just my $.02.

That's OK. Unlike Liam Neeson our skills are real and I'd put those skills against any and all "federal" personal/special agents/agencies. :munchin

The only way to take the guns from the people is to have the military backing those orders and that's not going to happen.

Congressman’s Wife Launches ‘Mothers Against Gun-Free Zones’
 

Think someone read our letter concerning the Second Amendment and our ideas concerning "gun free" zones?





Congressman’s Wife Launches ‘Mothers Against Gun-Free Zones’
by AWR Hawkins30 Oct 2015

Christy Stutzman is a wife, former teacher, and mother, who believes the “senseless acts of violence” often perpetrated on school campuses with a gun can be remedied not by taking away guns, but by taking away gun-free zones. To that end, Stutzman is rallying with other mothers around the country to launch Mothers Against Gun-Free Zones.

According to The Washington Times, Stutzman is focused on how her son will be able to maintain his own safety once he heads off to college, and having him in areas surrounded by “no guns allowed” signs does not really inspire confidence.

Stutzman said:


My No. 1 priority is to know with assurance that my son will be kept safe in every way and that, if attacked, he will have the ability and freedom to defend himself. Yes, by all means, we need to discuss the current lack of adequate treatments for mental health. There are obviously major issues that need to be addressed in that area of health care. But until that complicated subject is honestly addressed and corrected, there is one sure-fire, no-fail way to keep our kids safe: No Gun-Free Zones.

She points out that gun-free zones are obvious targets for madmen with guns, yet leaders on the Democrat side appear determined to maintain such zones at all costs–even when the costs include the lives of our children.

Stutzman asserted:


Looking at every mass shooting on record, since 2009, one thing is clear: Gun-free zones don’t protect, they endanger. The Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) released a report in 2014 showing that 92 percent of mass public shootings between January 2009 and July 2014 took place in gun-free zones. Have we become so politically correct that we are willing to ignore the facts to the detriment of our children’s safety?

She explains that gun-free zones are places that are only theoretically gun-free and/or safe. In reality, the very existence of such zones is “an invitation for those with evil intentions who seek to attack the weak.” Stutzman is urging mothers across the country to come together in Mothers Against Gun-Free Zones and fight to remove the zones, which leave children, young adults, teachers, and professors vulnerable to attack on campuses all over this nation.

Christy Stutzman is the wife of Rep. Marlin Stutzman (R-IN)

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...un-free-zones/

If the court declines to hear the case and lets these unconstitutional bans stand, they will send the nation on a nearly inevitable path towards another civil war.

The high court is considering whether to accept an appeal filed by Highland Park pediatrician Arie S. Friedman, 49, who claims the ban passed by the City Council in 2013 violates the Second Amendment because it denies him the right to use his semi-automatic weapons to protect his home and family. The new law required that residents such as Friedman, who owned firearms capable of rapidly firing more than 10 rounds of ammunition, either remove them from the city, modify them or turn them over to police.

Friedman, who filed the lawsuit along with the Illinois State Rifle Association, already has lost in two lower courts. A U.S. District Court upheld the ban last year, and the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that decision. The National Rifle Association has filed a brief to the Supreme Court in support of the suit.

http://bearingarms.com/supreme-court...ond-civil-war/

http://www.supremecourt.gov/search.a...les/15-133.htm

That's ok by me. I just hope it happens soon. :munchin

Obama to impose new gun control curbs next week
Washington Post
By Juliet Eilperin January 1 at 6:00 AM

HONOLULU — President Obama will meet with Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch on Monday to finalize a set of executive actions on guns that he will unveil next week, according to several individuals briefed on the matter.

White House officials declined to comment on Obama’s plans beyond releasing his weekly radio address on Friday, a day earlier than usual. But according to those familiar with the proposal, who asked for anonymity because it was not yet public, the president will expand new background-check requirements for buyers who purchase weapons from high-volume gun dealers.

The president will also use his executive authority in several other areas, these individuals said, but the overall package has not yet been finalized.

In the radio address, Obama said he was moving unilaterally because Congress had failed to address the growing problem of gun violence.

<snip> complete article at link:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...mepage%2Fstory

By all means. Curbing new gun control would be a refreshing idea.

Lol, "curbing gun control" ...not in the current alternate universe of emperor Obama.

Prediction: The "buy" numbers will again nudge upwards a tad.

Breaking news...

"This is so important that I just had to break my silence and come out of seclusion...Bathhouse Barry believes in the Second Amendment !"

Brian Williams