![]() |
1 Attachment(s)
Deja vu-doodoo and the zombie vote in 2012 - watch for it. ;)
And so it goes... Richard :munchin |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's exactly how BHO got elected. Drink the KoolAid and keep your head in the sand. |
Quote:
As for you thinking "he was cool." "Cool" is the last thing we need in a president. Crip |
Quote:
TR |
"Soporific"*
Source is here.
Quote:
While the president does his thing, I hope that a number of drivers will take the time to think about the decision they made in 2008 and the one they will make next year as they ponder this, that, and the other.<<LINK>> Quote:
Other than that... ______________________________________________ * Satoshi Tomiie featuring Kelli Ali, "Love in Traffic," remixed by John Digweed, Global Underground 019: Los Angeles (2001), disc 1, track 2. |
Quote:
Quote:
To help me understand why you’re having difficulty with this, could you tell me what unit you have served with, where your service was, and for what nation? |
I can see why someone who has drunk the Obama "cool"-Aid might jump on the anti-Fox News bandwagon, since bashing Fox News is second nature to this sort. Indeed, George Soros has spent millions of dollars feeding fellow leftists anti-Fox News talking points. And Ron Paul-bots are also known for their dispassionate reactions to any criticisms of their dear leader.
But the idea of calling Fox News liars and then citing CNN and the BBC as your go-to source? That is laughable. CNN's own officials have admitted that they deliberately shaded their reporting and refused to cover stories that might embarrass Saddam Hussein's regime. Their defense was that they wanted to maintain access and being a willing tool of Iraqi propagandists was a small price to pay to be able to report "live from Baghdad." One wonders what other compromises they make with local thugs to "report" from Beijing or Tehran or Havana or elsewhere. That said, even I would not dismiss a source out of hand due to bias (mine or the sources). A good analyst (of news, intelligence, whatever) doesn't mindlessly close off sources of information but assesses the information taking into account the credibility and reliability of the source. The fact is, even if you don't agree with its editorial spin, Fox News covers stories that other media outlets ignore, and only a rank partisan would dismiss it out of hand. And that goes both ways. I too follow coverage from CNN and BBC, applying the same grains of salt as I would with Fox. With the exception of the Arab-Israeli conflict, where the bias is stifling, the BBC actually covers the Middle East much better than most other Western news agencies. And the BBC's Africa coverage leaves American news agencies in the dust (probably our lack of a colonial legacy there means we pay less attention). For that matter, I will watch al-Jazeera for coverage of the Middle East (again, ex-Arab-Israeli conflict) to make sure my information picture is as complete as possible given available resources. Of course, what is most laughable is that someone whose idea of political judgment is to be enamored of how "cool" a politician is, thinks he is qualified to participate in a discussion by serious-minded people. |
Reply
Quote:
This clown cannot make a decision. Who here wants "O" as there team leader? Try to imagine him as your Mike Force BN CO? Try to put him in any position you can count on? He could not earn a CSB. Combat Shit Burner Badge. The end. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22. |
Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®