Professional Soldiers ®

Professional Soldiers ® (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Soapbox (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=93)
-   -   Protecting the Second Amendment – Why all Americans Should Be Concerned (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=40772)

badshot 01-27-2014 17:54

"the Forrest Service and allowed the repairs to the water system for a city in his county. He did not and local citizens went up with shovels and sidearms to repair it."

True American spirit...

The fed land managers in southern az are a good bunch too. Let me drive deep into one of the wilderness areas down their once to track a bad lion.

PSM 01-27-2014 23:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by badshot (Post 539094)
"the Forrest Service and allowed the repairs to the water system for a city in his county. He did not and local citizens went up with shovels and sidearms to repair it."

True American spirit...

The fed land managers in southern az are a good bunch too. Let me drive deep into one of the wilderness areas down their once to track a bad lion.

To be honest, the sidearms were not to intimidate the FS personal. It's pretty much daily wear wherever you go here and defiantly when going into wilderness areas. Then again... ;)

Pat

badshot 01-28-2014 01:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSM (Post 539133)
To be honest, the sidearms were not to intimidate the FS personal. It's pretty much daily wear wherever you go here and defiantly when going into wilderness areas. Then again... ;)
Pat

I believe you, there are some Bob Munden(rip) types here that need special single actions. Actually getting in the market pretty soon myself for a 3 1/2 birds head - mine broke in Montana (blew up - nice scar on left side of face too) - don't have a few thousand to spend on a new one yet - gettin' alittle out of practice %^#. A good single can shoot faster than a 1911 - for me two at a time - Munden types scary fast. Good for critters :D

Love Arizona!

Crap ten of the Worlds best shooter's are in New River alone - Whoever said don't mess with Texas?

PSM 01-28-2014 20:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by pcfixer (Post 539046)
As an SF soldier you would rather the enemy die for his country than you die for yours!

I missed this the first time. I am not, and was not, SF. But, as a former Soldier, I agree.

Pat

GratefulCitizen 02-03-2014 18:26

Printz v US may prove to be quite significant.

http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/51leg/2r/bills/sb1294p.pdf

This bill has teeth:
Quote:

D. ANY AGENT OR EMPLOYEE OF THIS STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE WHO KNOWINGLY VIOLATES THIS SECTION IS DEEMED TO HAVE RESIGNED ANY COMMISSION FROM THIS STATE THAT THE PERSON MAY POSSESS, THE PERSON'S OFFICE IS DEEMED VACANT AND THE PERSON IS FOREVER AFTER INELIGIBLE TO HOLD ANY OFFICE OF TRUST, HONOR OR EMOLUMENT UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS STATE.
E. ANY PERSON OR CORPORATION THAT PROVIDES SERVICES TO OR ON BEHALF OF THIS STATE AND THAT VIOLATES THIS SECTION IS FOREVER INELIGIBLE TO ACT ON BEHALF OF, OR PROVIDE SERVICES TO, THIS STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE.

MR2 02-13-2014 16:44

Officials in Connecticut Stunned by What Could Be a Massive, State-Wide Act of ‘Civil Disobedience’ by Gun Owners

On Jan. 1, 2014, tens of thousands of defiant gun owners seemingly made the choice not to register their semi-automatic rifles with the state of Connecticut as required by a hastily-passed gun control law. By possessing unregistered so-called “assault rifles,” they all technically became guilty of committing Class D felonies overnight.


Molon Labe!

PSM 02-13-2014 17:39

California ban on concealed weapons overturned by 9th Circuit appeals court
 
California ban on concealed weapons overturned by 9th Circuit appeals court

Quote:

By Paul Elias, Associated Press
POSTED: 02/13/14, 12:25 PM PST | UPDATED: 56 SECS AGO

SAN FRANCISCO — A divided federal appeals court has struck down California’s concealed weapons rules, saying they violate the Second Amendment right to bear arms.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Thursday that California is wrong to require applicants to show good cause to receive a permit to carry a concealed weapon. The court ruled that all law-abiding citizens are entitled to carry concealed weapons outside the home for self-defense purposes.

The divided three-judge panel disagreed with two other federal appeals courts that have upheld permit rules similar to California’s.

The U.S. Supreme Court often takes cases when federal appeals courts issue conflicting rulings.

The Supreme Court ruled in 2008 that law-abiding citizens can keep handguns in the home for self-defense purposes, but didn’t address whether that right extends outside the home.

http://www.dailynews.com/government-...-appeals-court
Did hell freeze over and I missed it? :confused:

Pat

badshot 02-13-2014 18:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSM (Post 541517)
Did hell freeze over

Interesting...it must have

The Supreme Court ruled in 2008 that law-abiding citizens can keep handguns in the home for self-defense purposes, but didn’t address whether that right extends outside the home.

Morons! 'Bear' means: (of a person) carry. bring, transport, move, convey, take, fetch, deliver, tote, lug...pretty straight forward to a dumb ass like myself.


Do they really need the Supreme Court to figure that out :eek:

Peregrino 02-13-2014 18:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSM (Post 541517)
California ban on concealed weapons overturned by 9th Circuit appeals court

Did hell freeze over and I missed it? :confused:

Pat

Sorry, I'm a pessimist; especially WRT the 9th Circuit. We live in troubled times and this does not follow the established pattern. Given that it conflicts with two other Federal Circuit decisions it might be a strategy to force the Supreme Court to review the case law. That concerns me.

tonyz 02-13-2014 20:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by MR2 (Post 541502)
Officials in Connecticut Stunned by What Could Be a Massive, State-Wide Act of ‘Civil Disobedience’ by Gun Owners

On Jan. 1, 2014, tens of thousands of defiant gun owners seemingly made the choice not to register their semi-automatic rifles with the state of Connecticut as required by a hastily-passed gun control law. By possessing unregistered so-called “assault rifles,” they all technically became guilty of committing Class D felonies overnight.


Molon Labe!

The middle finger was given to an overreaching government...civil disobedience has often played a very important roll in the evolution of this nation.

badshot 02-13-2014 21:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonyz (Post 541545)
Molon Labe!

Don't know where I could of put it, did I sell it at a gun show, honey where's my rifle - did you throw it out again?

tonyz 02-13-2014 21:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by badshot (Post 541547)
Don't know where I could of put it, did I sell it at a gun show, honey where's my rifle - did you throw it out again?

I hear boating accidents are not uncommon...even in AZ.

badshot 02-13-2014 21:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonyz (Post 541549)
I hear boating accidents are not uncommon...even in AZ.

Lol, that's a good one.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 20:20.


Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®