Professional Soldiers ® - Protecting the Second Amendment – Why all Americans Should Be Concerned

Professional Soldiers ® (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/index.php)

- The Soapbox (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=93)

- - Protecting the Second Amendment – Why all Americans Should Be Concerned (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=40772)

True but I doubt there would be easy access to them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Reaper (Post 529850)

Illegal drugs are in people's homes as well.

Can we suspend the Bill of Rights and conduct no-knock, warrantless searches of everyone's home for them too? Should the firearms owners have to prove their innocence under the presumptive guilt of the state?

How about those pesky mattress tag removers?

Unlicensed pets?

Do these idiot politicians not understand the rights this country was built upon?

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

TR

Exactly.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ddoering (Post 529856)

They will after a bunch of cops get shot trying to do their dirty work......

I've got a few friends with our local police department and my wife is a dispatcher for them (large department). More than a few have brought up this topic and they all say theirs no way they will be apart of something like that.

I pray they aren't stupid enough to put anything like that into law. I have no doubt it would lead to blood shed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Broadsword2004 (Post 529933)

That politician has since backed off from that statement from what I've read, as it caused a hailstorm. He said he was just making a suggestion or something like that.

He should be thrown out of office for even thinking that way. Preferably from the window of his office.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Broadsword2004 (Post 529933)

That politician has since backed off from that statement from what I've read, as it caused a hailstorm. He said he was just making a suggestion or something like that.

The follow up story to that idiot in Swampscott, MA.

The fact that an elected official actually floated this trial ballon is not surprising but is disturbing.

Town Nixes Home Gun Safety Inspection

The town's lawyer said the town would need the homeowner's consent or a valid search warrant with probable cause to inspect for safe gun storage. DUH ! Crack legal work rat there !

Posted by Terry Date (Editor) , November 13, 2013 at 10:25 PM

“At the November 6th, 2013 Board of Selectmen’s meeting, it was requested by Selectman Vice-Chairman Barry Greenfield, through the Board of Selectmen, to Town Counsel that he review the enforceability of Massachusetts General Law Chapter 140, Section 131L regarding the storage of firearms in homes within a locked container, by mechanical lock or safety device based on the concern of children accessing them. Upon review by Town Counsel, the Town would need to obtain either the homeowner’s consent or have a valid search warrant based on probable cause. The Town will not take any further action regarding this law and further reconfirms their support for the laws of our Commonwealth and the rights under the United States Constitution.”

<snip>

http://swampscott.patch.com/groups/p...ant-or-consent

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spiffav8 (Post 529938)

He should be thrown out of office for even thinking that way. Preferably from the window of his office.

We need a like button.

^^------ Something like that;):D?

If the moderators add a like button, then also perhaps.....

Quote:

Originally Posted by plato (Post 530008)

If the moderators add a like button, then also perhaps.....

Liked

A quick vid reminding some of us about the difficulty in exercising one's Second Amendment rights in NYC (and other socialist enclaves):

(Purely rhetorical)...

Do criminals go through this process...?????

Then, who are the bureaucrats and political elites actually controlling?

Yup, more feel good, costly and ineffective regulation. Unless, of course, they really want to control the law abiding...

http://video.foxnews.com/v/284278033...uy-sat-on-fnc/

DescriptionOn FNC at 9 p.m.: Will FBN’s John Stossel get his gun? The answer, plus more outrageous regulations on your home, car, business...
DateNov 16, 2013
Duration1:47
PersonalitiesJohn Stossel

Isn't ammo metallic?

Not much good having an undetectable gun without undetectable bullets.

TR