Professional Soldiers ®

Professional Soldiers ® (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Discussions (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=46)
-   -   What do you think about DADT? (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31582)

Dusty 12-19-2010 13:32

No matter the opposing argument, I can't seem to gin up a vision of a flameboy on a Team.

Paslode 12-19-2010 14:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by ryno (Post 364139)
Why is it when anyone brings up Thermopylae they neglect to mention the 300 Spartans were only a small percentage of the thousands of Greek troops there? Anyway, as far as ancient Greece went, it wasn't so much homosexuality as it was pederasty or what we would call child molestation. The whole argument is irrelevant anyway as Greece was never as great as the GREEK historians recalled, just as Rome was not as great as the ROMAN historians recalled. All of it is irrelevant when comparing it to our military today.
I personally do not want to share cramped quarters with or shower with anyone who is openly homosexual. Just as a vast majority of females I've served with did not want to shower with me (no matter how big my ego was).


Pederasty (we refer to as Pedophilia) brings up an interesting point for those that wish use homosexuality as a positive or mute point in that the Spartans were openly gay or bi-sexual.

How would you feel if NAMBLA members were allowed to serve openly in the Military.....I mean it is only Pederasty and beside the Spartans did it :rolleyes:

So if the Homosexuals have the right to equal protection and equal rights........why not NAMBLA? They do have a lobbying group you know...




Wasn't Tony Curtis a victim of Pederasty in Sparticus.....or was that just a homosexual act with a slave boy???

wet dog 12-19-2010 14:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete (Post 364131)
Not so - your examples have one thing in common. They are empires thrown into the dustbin of history.

Empires rise and fall. Most declines are caused by similar social reasons. Rome did not fall in a day - took a couple of hundred years.

So the question about DADT repeal is "Is it helping us up or helping us down?"

Richard is correct regarding empires.

But in Rome, the fall was triggered by an economic event. The salt mines flooded, (Rome's single largest revenue producer and natural resource export), causing an interruption in revenue and the ability to pay for legion guards to protect the city (Rome) from invaders. An attack was not "around the corner", it simply went unguarded for a few decades, then a century, then another. Rome felt safe for a short season, a 100 years, but Rome the city never recovered, nor did the mines ever re-open, still today.

Rome the empire could not financially sustain itself in remote regions. Religious and/or Idealogies pursuit changed the fabric of the city, the empire. The nature of Rome turned to self indulgence, the arts, entertainment.

Agriculture slowed because Rome was no longer exporting salt, revenues from crops or supported the supply chain management in feeding occupying troops in remote locations. Legions who would nornally buy/pay for services from local farmers began to starve. They remained in the area, but left the empire to marry locals and take up plows, farms and families or took up jobs working for other armies. Back in Rome, families were viewed as "old establishments". Being single, not having babies, families, was the "new" fashion. Rome the city was ripe to invading Northmen, rich in posessions, but lacking in substance/revenues.

Before there was a Greece, there was only a region.

Greece became a collection of countries, co-operating in collective benefits, agriculture to textile industry.

A woman launches a thousand ships and Greece invades Troy, a 8-12 year campaign according to Homer, depending on your start point, not a 3 hour episode.

Rome rises out of the dust of Troy, but that took awhile too.

America will fall when the following conditions exist...

Ecomonic instability:
When we are importing more than we export.
Our cash management, coffers, treasuries are thin.
Debt is high.
When we are held hostage to energy and supply chain management.

Occupation:
When our enemies can occupy terrain and land without consequences.
When having large families are not viewed as socially acceptable.
When the lines of culture are squewed.
When self indulgence is more important then responsibility.

Invasion:
Overt and covert
When the army is indifferent to leadership

When we are weak,....

I could be wrong, this has never happened before.

Dusty 12-19-2010 14:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paslode (Post 364145)
How would you feel if NAMBLA members were allowed to serve openly in the Military.....I mean it is only Pederasty and beside the Spartans did it :rolleyes:

How many years ago was the thought of homos serving openly as abhorrent?

greenberetTFS 12-19-2010 15:37

Does this also apply to "transvestites"?..........:confused:

Big Teddy :munchin

abc_123 12-19-2010 15:48

Just wait until Married couple Bob and Steve move in next to you in on-post housing!

J8127 12-19-2010 18:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dusty (Post 364149)
How many years ago was the thought of homos serving openly as abhorrent?

And how many years ago was the thought of blacks or women serving abhorrent?

Pedastry is illegal, bestiality is illegal, those arguments are ridiculous.

And like you, I can't picture a flaming, poor me-victim penetrating (pun intended) any special operations community, or lasting very long in a conventional combat arms community. I am positive there are homosexuals out there more than capable of honorably and professionally serving in SF, SEALs, CCT, Rangers, whatever, they already have been for years and will continue to do so no matter what happens with DADT.

wet dog 12-19-2010 18:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by abc_123 (Post 364162)
Just wait until Married couple Bob and Steve move in next to you in on-post housing!

And Bob is your Sr Rater on your upcoming NCOER

Dusty 12-19-2010 19:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by J8127 (Post 364198)
Pedastry is illegal, bestiality is illegal, those arguments are ridiculous.

Are you saying homosexuality isn't (or wasn't until the repeal) re: UCMJ?

SouthernDZ 12-19-2010 19:13

Took the words right out of my mouth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by abc_123 (Post 364162)
Just wait until Married couple Bob and Steve move in next to you in on-post housing!

ABC_123 - you beat me to it.

This will no doubt be the first challenge the military will have to face. Not only will two male Soldiers and/or two female Soldiers dance together at the Dining-In and Christmas Party, there will be demands to get married and recieve BAQ. I suspect the gay agenda has "test cases" waiting in the wings as we speak.

I'm constantly amazed how many resonably smart people (congress?) do not really understand what a ripple effect is.

uplink5 12-19-2010 19:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by SouthernDZ (Post 364204)
ABC_123 - you beat me to it.

This will no doubt be the first challenge the military will have to face. Not only will two male Soldiers and/or two female Soldiers dance together at the Dining-In and Christmas Party, there will be demands to get married and recieve BAQ. I suspect the gay agenda has "test cases" waiting in the wings as we speak.

I'm constantly amazed how many resonably smart people (congress?) do not really understand what a ripple effect is.

Who knows what the next round of correctness will bring, and what will the next incremental challenge be? woman in combat arms MOSs; Rangers; Special Forces; living arrangements? Sky's the limit for these folks and their on a role. The people behind this have other targets in their folder to be sure.....jd

J8127 12-19-2010 19:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dusty (Post 364201)
Are you saying homosexuality isn't (or wasn't until the repeal) re: UCMJ?

It is not illegal for an American citizen to be a homosexual, that is what I was referring too.

Oral sex is illegal under the UCMJ as well...

Dusty 12-19-2010 19:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by J8127 (Post 364207)
It is not illegal for an American citizen to be a homosexual, that is what I was referring too.

Oral sex is illegal under the UCMJ as well...

The subject, as I see it, pertains to the UCMJ; oral sex is more than likely a homosexual act, I would think-so why call the comparisons ridiculous?

trvlr 12-19-2010 19:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by J8127 (Post 364198)
And how many years ago was the thought of blacks or women serving abhorrent?

Apples and oranges. First, you generallycan't hide what ethnic group you belong to if you're black. Black/White males and females have the same physiology.

Homosexuality is currently viewed as a lifestyle choice, and can be easily hidden.

While I am obviously for the repeal, it's not the same as black males being allowed to shoot with the Confederates or Union in the Civil War. It's not the same as black males being integrated into other combat MOSs after the Korean war. It's not the same as women being allowed to serve in certain Army units.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:44.


Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®