Professional Soldiers ®

Professional Soldiers ® (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Discussions (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=46)
-   -   Expansion of "Civics Exam" Discussion (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39055)

GratefulCitizen 08-13-2012 07:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard (Post 462706)
Jefferson advocated for some form of public education for all citizens who would otherwise be unable to avail themselves of the existent educational opportunities.

Point conceded.
Based on his writings, what do you think his opinion would be of truancy laws?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard (Post 462706)
The model, as instituted in Prussia, was a tax-funded and generally compulsory primary education, comprising an eight-year course of primary education. It provided not only the skills needed in an early industrialized world (reading, writing and arithmetic), but also a strict education in ethics (IAW the state sponsored religion), duty, discipline and obedience. Affluent children often went on to attend preparatory private schools for an additional four years, but the general population had virtually no access to secondary education. It instituted compulsory attendance, specific training for teachers, national testing for all students (used to classify children for potential job training), national curriculum set for each grade and mandatory kindergarten. The purpose of the system was to instill loyalty to the Crown and to train young men for the military and the bureaucracy by replacing local control over schooling with a centralized, uniform system administered by the state under which all schools and universities were made institutions of the state.

Although we have adopted certain components of the model, we have retained a much greater decentralization in methodology, and have neither sought to institute such a system nor for such a purpose.[/COLOR]

There's plenty of information out there regarding the Prussian techniques.
Anyone who is interested can look and discern for themselves what components were retained, and for what purposes.

Regarding decentralization, I am in total agreement that we have retained much and it is of great benefit.
However, the federal government and the UN have been seeking to undermine that decentralization.

The purpose of federal funding is to gain control.
The POTUS pushed the idea of a federal truancy law to age 18 in a state of the union address.
The UN has been pushing the "Rights of the Child" treaty for some time.

It's hard to say how well the Pierce v. Society of Sisters precedent will hold.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard (Post 462706)
YGBSM – an evolved ‘Luther’ model whereby people need to read so they can study the ‘word of god’ expanded to add an 'industrial needs' component - serving the ‘educational’ needs for whom?

The Sunday ‘schools’ were organized by people who found that working-class children required some form of discipline, and evening schools were established to teach reading, writing, arithmetic, and catechism to the 'deserving' poor where enrollment was decided upon by visits with parents, nominations from subscribers, and individual student applications.

The Sunday school also developed into a hub of social interaction for a class of children and parents who were rapidly moving away from small, close-knit, rural communities to large, over-populated, urban centers where catechism could be preached and taught to a population that, until that time, only learned it via a rote memorization system. As the ‘schools’ gained in popularity and effectiveness, the churches started to actively provide them with facilities and finances, giving them a tighter control over their management and curriculum.


The only formalized moral instruction I’ve encountered in public schools is based primarily upon the universally recognized ‘golden rule’ and not a specified or state sponsored religious belief. Private and parochial schools, as well as home schools, however, are different and have the latitude to espouse whatever moral instruction they choose to adopt for their curriculum.

Not going to dispute any of this.
Just wanted to get your take on the Prussian model and whether public systems are designed to benefit the state.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard (Post 462706)
Perhaps the desire and design of the American system (which is similar to but quite different from the model found in Germany which remains much closer to the original Prussian methodology) is to benefit both, not merely one or the other.

However, YMMV.

Richard
:munchin

Benefit both?
Perhaps that was the desire and design.

But what happens when the interests of the state and the individual are in conflict in a government school?
We know who ultimately yields.

Richard 08-13-2012 08:05

RE Post #31 - good points - and I agree wholeheartedly with the 'he who controls the purse strings controls the household' issues afflicting education today and in the near term. That was always an issue with us in the private school world and the main reason we refused to accept government (federal, state, local) funding of any sort.

FWIW - the BRD is in the process of looking to revise their current version of the 'Prussian Model' of education and looking at the American model as a guide which - in their eyes - lends itself to continually fostering levels of creativity and originality the BRD is seeking and cannot seem to achieve.

And sso it goes...

Richard
:munchin


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 19:30.


Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®