Professional Soldiers ®

Professional Soldiers ® (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/index.php)
-   3rd Special Forces Group (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   Picture time (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7742)

alphamale 07-31-2005 16:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Reaper
Do you not have an M-4 of your own to have and hold, feed and care for?

Nope. Not in-the-flesh. I thought the mags were straight from movies and TV, and that the curved ones were old fashioned types.

I had an amazing AR-15 but it was stolen when I moved.

FrontSight

NousDefionsDoc 07-31-2005 16:46

Nice pics

The Reaper 07-31-2005 17:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by FrontSight
Nope. Not in-the-flesh. I thought the mags were straight from movies and TV, and that the curved ones were old fashioned types.

I had an amazing AR-15 but it was stolen when I moved.

FrontSight

You had an AR-15, but did not know that the mags were curved?

There has got to be something wrong here.

TR

alphamale 07-31-2005 17:17

Yep.

Past tense .

I don't remember if I ever shot it or not. I first wanted to learn about the HK .223.

And then, it was gone.

FrontSight

Roguish Lawyer 07-31-2005 17:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Reaper
You had an AR-15, but did not know that the mags were curved?

There has got to be something wrong here.

TR

Perhaps she had difficulty lifting a 30-round mag, and went with 10? :munchin

The Reaper 07-31-2005 17:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by FrontSight
Yep.

Past tense :( .

I don't remember if I ever shot it or not. I first wanted to learn about the HK .223.

And then, it was gone.

FrontSight

Interesting concept, owning guns that you have never fired.

Good point, RL, she may have had to use 5 rounders.

TR

alphamale 07-31-2005 17:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Reaper
Interesting concept, owning guns that you have never fired.

I did shoot someone else's AR-15. It felt so good and light I had to get one. Then I moved and poof. (That and a used .22 rifle of some kind that I also had never fired was taken. But not my HK .223.)

Those were strange days. I was trying lots of guns and going to a bazillion classes and was drop-dead serious about everything.

FrontSight

alphamale 07-31-2005 21:56

On the gun that he's holding, what is just forward of the scope?

TR, that gun doesn't look anything like my AR did. It doesn't have the distinctive _____ towards the front. (I'll remember the name in a minute...)

FrontSight

The Reaper 07-31-2005 22:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by FrontSight
On the gun that he's holding, what is just forward of the scope?

TR, that gun doesn't look anything like my AR did. It doesn't have the distinctive _____ towards the front. (I'll remember the name in a minute...)

FrontSight

That "gun" (more correctly, a rifle, a carbine, or an M-4), appears to have an optical sight, a PAQ-4 or PEQ-2 IR Illuminator, and a SureFire Millenium flashlight mounted.

I have no idea what your AR had, I can assure you that his M-4 appears to be properly configured.

TR

Smokin Joe 08-01-2005 00:57

I just noticed his BDU top, very interesting....new tiger strip?

Kyobanim 08-01-2005 02:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smokin Joe
I just noticed his BDU top, very interesting....new tiger strip?

tiger stripe has been around for a while. I believe it really became "popular" during RVN.

Smokin Joe 08-01-2005 02:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyobanim
tiger stripe has been around for a while. I believe it really became "popular" during RVN.

Roger that however I have never seen US personal in the box wearing the desert tiger stripe.

Peregrino 08-01-2005 08:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smokin Joe
Roger that however I have never seen US personal in the box wearing the desert tiger stripe.

They look to be the "chocolate chips" of Desert I notoriety. The pattern has a lot more brown and some black. I don't think the active Army still issues it (too dark for ME deserts) - though it looks adequate in the terrain visible in the pictures. The flag on the sleeve is the IR visible one. It "glows" when illuminated (by IR) to keep some trigger happy gunner from lighting you up after painting you like a target. It's crooked because its velcroed to the flap of a pocket (usually the lower pockets off the front of the shirt) that has been sewn (at an angle) to the upper sleeve. The Marines and now the Army have incorporated this into the new uniforms. The bottom shirt pockets have always been pretty useless in the field with LBE over them. Add tucking in the shirt tail and body armor and they become a real PITA. I'm glad the uniform board finally accepted something front line soldiers have been doing for years. And the flag on the chest is correct. FWIW - Peregrino

lurp 08-01-2005 12:12

Hi
Nice pics :munchin

It is desert-tigers.

Anyway here is another strange civi question. How is it with the uniform regulations (in Afghanistan), can you were other us uniform's, like other camoflage or plain khakis?
(thinking about Multicam etc. since the taliban mostly use's a carpet and a scarf)
I have seen operators in plain khaki and tigerstripes, are those SF or pmc's?

:confused: Thanks

Stryker 08-01-2005 16:35

nice pics


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 22:55.


Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®