Professional Soldiers ®

Professional Soldiers ® (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Early Bird (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=45)
-   -   Another shooting in a gun free zone.... (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=50964)

Sohei 06-02-2016 09:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by PedOncoDoc (Post 609899)
My current institution allows for CC on campus (excepting the hospitals). I was amazed/disappointed at the ignorance of my colleagues when firearms were specifically addressed at the on-boarding orientation.

I wish more were like yours. It's hard to prevent "murder-suicides", but true mass-shootings and/or active shooter situations could certainly reap the benefits of being a CC campus.

Old Dog New Trick 06-02-2016 10:32

This guy (Maniack Sarckar)(sic) is going to turn out to be a liberal pacifist poster boy. You watch...

When smart people go full retard!

VVVV 06-02-2016 10:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brush Okie (Post 609902)
Damn it man don't let the facts get in the way of a good liberal driven news story. Turn off your brain and drink your cool aid


Also that was what was being reported when I posted.

I suggest you find a more timely source for news.

Pete 06-02-2016 11:20

The woman
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WCH (Post 609907)
I suggest you find a more timely source for news.

The woman in MN makes three.

So if they link both shootings - to the left three or more is a mass shooting these days.

PedOncoDoc 06-02-2016 11:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete (Post 609909)
The woman in MN makes three.

So if they link both shootings - to the left three or more is a mass shooting these days.

I'm not sure if the fact they were days apart and in separate states affects the application of their definition.

Old Dog New Trick 06-02-2016 11:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete (Post 609909)
The woman in MN makes three.

So if they link both shootings - to the left three or more is a mass shooting these days.

"Serial shooter"

Sohei 06-02-2016 11:53

Personally, I don't see a problem with having "homicides" with multiple victims and "active shooter" incidents. People tend to complicate things.

Like the "person of interest" bandwagon that was started a few years ago resulting in every department deciding to wear that phrase out.

Team Sergeant 06-02-2016 13:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agoge2 (Post 609897)
Colleges will always be soft targets. Many are liberal bastions and will never want or allow CC on their campuses. They will reap the rewards that come with being a known "No Gun Zone."

And you just gave me an idea.......

What if this is exactly what the left-wing progressives/socialists want? More killings in gun free zones just to justify confiscation of all guns? Australia did it, can it happen here?

Crazy? The socialists/communists have murdered millions all over the world for less.

Sohei 06-02-2016 13:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Team Sergeant (Post 609920)
And you just gave me an idea.......

What if this is exactly what the left-wing progressives/socialists want? More killings in gun free zones just to justify confiscation of all guns? Australia did it, can it happen here?

Crazy? The socialists/communists have murdered millions all over the world for less.


Perfect example of...riddle me this and reading between the lines....;)

DIYPatriot 06-30-2016 14:51

TN Gun Free Zones - Accountability
 
Here's an interesting piece of legislation that goes into effect in my home state tomorrow.

Quote:

As of July 1, if a handgun carry permit holder in Tennessee is injured,
suffers bodily injury or death, incurs economic loss or expense, property damage or any other compensable loss on a property posted as a gun-free zone, they can sue the person or entity who stripped them of their right to self defense. In layman’s terms, any permit holder injured as a result of being stripped of their right to self defense, and their handgun, in a posted gun-free zone can file a lawsuit within two years of the event as long as they meet the following requirements:
  • Were authorized to carry a gun at the time of the incident
  • Prohibited from carrying a firearm due to the posting of a gun-free sign
  • The property owner was not required to be posted by state or federal law and posted by choice

Can you imagine? Holding gun-free zone property accountable for injuries people sustained by being disarmed and left defenseless? Groundbreaking.
Full Story

Senate Bill

Badger52 06-30-2016 17:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by DIYPatriot (Post 611666)
Here's an interesting piece of legislation that goes into effect in my home state tomorrow.

Out-freaking-standing.
:cool:

ddoering 06-30-2016 17:19

If they strip you of your Right of self defense then they should be responsible for protecting you.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 17:13.


Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®