My hart flutters when I read such titillating material,,
But alas,, I put the BS meter to it and it comes up a "10"..

Needed: Face & Name...

Maybe: Stephanopoulos????

:(:eek::rolleyes::confused:

Hillary Clinton.;)

Hmmmmm... :confused:

If it's an anonymous e-mail and looks too good to be true...it probably isn't. Run it through Snopes! :rolleyes::D

Richard's $.02 :munchin

Now there's a plan!

I'm pretty sure in is not James Carvell.

RF 1

Words of wisdom.

And so, in a spirit of contrition, I attach some instruments for future reference. :D

It was entertaining anyhow, in a Clancy sort of way.

I suspect it is a republican trying to rally the way ward flock back to the standard bearer (a good thing). It was a fun read though.

troubleshooter77 was not only a troll but a moron also.

troubleshooter77 used a "De Oppresso Liber" in his sig line but would not explain it to us, I guess he thought he could "act" as if he was indeed one of us and get away with it here on this board. Not likely. He was also asked to back his ideas/opinions with heated discussion, he attempted to completly change the tenor of the thread instead. Not a smart idea, not on this board.

Now if I need to explain my actions again to you or anyone esle please feel free to go to those other "military" boards where the motive is profit driven and the playing field is five military personnel for every ten thousand idiots, you know the sites where the owners kiss the asses of the members because each and everyone of them equals a dollar sign.

Military.com is a perfect example.

Now "Listen" closely, this is a Special Forces website, not to be confused with a "profit motivated" SOF website. This is our website and the funny part is the civilians are the guests. Strange concept right?

You see on this board if and when you irritate one of us you've probably irritated many of us, and we don't have to put up with it.

We enjoy intelligent discussion, we also enjoy the ability to ban the idiots.

The word is out concerning this website, idiots are not welcome.

Team Sergeant

Spot On.........:lifter
We in SF have supported our selfs just like on deployments throughout our history. I love to have an Intelligent debate but do not want to waste time with Idiots.
Keep up the fight and ban the Idiots as they pop up. :munchin

The Dims have a Bill before congress to ban these things; ear marked in the 4 Nov election . :D


RF 1

If one person misunderstood me I might think it was their problem but since several people have now misunderstood me I accept that it is my writing. I will try a final time to make myself clear because there was never an intended reproach or insult to anyone on this site.

After reading nmap's post about an Obama staffer who claimed to check out right wing blog sites, I wondered if some of the posters like troubleshooter were POSSIBLY interlopers.

What I was trying to convey was my belief that the PS.com board would handle them in short order. I was GLAD to see that Troubleshooter was banned after he failed to back up his point of view.

I've reread my posts and I can see that the first one was confusing and I apologize for not being clearer. I was not criticizing this site or its board or the decision to ban. I was merely wondering, in an apparently hamfisted way, if outsiders had trolled this site and if they were the ones you had banned.

I have always been respectful in my posts and I realize that I am a guest here. Hopefully, this clears up my position.

This is the part of your paragraph that could be read two ways.... I took it as we "disappeared" him just because he was a democrat.

Now I understand what you were trying to say.

I know there's more democrats on here and I've not "disappeared" all of them, well, not yet anyway....;)

TS

I'm glad it was straightened out. In the future I will proof read my posts and edit out any double meanings. I get a lot out of this site and the last thing I wanted to do was offend.

Sort of like a ps.com version of "Whack-a-Mole"? :D

FWIW, I'm a registered Democrat because that's what my parents were when I was growing up. However, we are of the Northern California Central Valley ilk which have been mentioned in this forum and who believe people sometimes need help for awhile...but not forever, that a person pays his bills, that declaring bankruptcy is an unpardonable sin, that education is a family's responsibility and not that of some bureaucracy, and that BIG government at any level is neither necessary nor appreciated. ;)

All of this helps explain why I am upset with both major political parties right now and wish there was a more palatable alternative. :(

I only voted for a Democrat Presidential candidate once...that was for JEC's second term because I was leery of RR; I have not made that mistake twice.

I have three grown sons--one is a Marin County ultra-liberal and the other two are staunch conservatives.

Now...ban me if you must...it happened to my ancestors many years ago (attchd pic) and I will learn to live with it as they have done. :D

Richard's $.02 :munchin

I've actually heard conversations about party affiliation that are of interest. There are those here in Maryland that are in fact registered Democrats simply because that is the only way to be truly engaged in the selection of candidates.... This is very much a single-party state.

Translation..at least you can try to influence the more conservative of the liberals in the primaries.

Being "erased" would probably depend upon the lack of intelligent discussion in support of you views and opinions.

If your comback is something along the lines of "Oh yeahh!" OR "Well you're stupid." then I imagine you should be outside the garden :D (mind the flaming sword)