En Inglés: http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/...7&postcount=92 ;)

Pat

Damn

No more......"Awright, men....tighten up that line...Nuts to Butts, Nuts to Butts".

I believe they should have separate shower facilities for lesbians and gays together since they belong in the now open sex law..............:mad: :mad: :mad:

Big Teddy :munchin

Logically, open pedophilia followed by DADT vampirism, bestiality, necrophilia and whatnot will be next.

Something I've been thinking about lately...as it relates to EO training, who's going to give the classes...and what kind of "stigma" is going to be attached to the person forced to give the brief.

PARTY!
"human sacrifice; dogs and cat living together, mass hysteria"
Please run the "if this ; then" past this Jesuit Education survivor.

I say let the gay dudes shower and bunk with the females, they can share shampoos and skin care lotions…

Oh and the lesbos get to shower and hang out with us guys! But they gotta bring their own beer!

Just joking (or thing about Star Ship Troopers shower scene again!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3ZOKDmorj0

I think I saw Slimer over on aisle 7 in Albrtson's yesterday. :D

"Who ya gonna call..."

Richard :munchin

One positive; extremely competent urinalysis viewers. aka meat gazers :munchin

My bet is that folks like this will more than likely keep on keeping on. They do not want to be seen as having an agenda, and therefore will not be disclosing their orientation any time in the near future.

If sexual orientation becomes another protected class as defined by AR 600-20, EO Advisors will end up having to suck that egg. I'm sure some bureaucrats are at this moment writing changes to the AR, and classes complete with a slide show presentation in PowerPoint, dramatic training and awareness films, and graphic training aids such as posters and maybe even a deck of cards with the "most wanted".

Yep, even the Army's preventive maintenance monthly magazine could come back in vogue......we sure as hell could never go back to the way it was.

Thank God for retirement.....jd

Therein lies my question. We all know the makeup of the vast majority of EO reps, as well as the "why" they all fit a similar profile...no good will come of this "mandatory training."

EO...shmeeoh...and - based on my experiences with the system - it all depends on the who, what, when , where, how, and why.

I knew guys who got caught up in EO complaints for good reason - they were dumb s***s. They got their peepees whacked and then never passed up an opportunity to carp about how the system was eff'd up and they were victimized by it.

I had an EO complaint filed against me once for relieving an NCO for duty performance after we'd spent a frustrating 90 days working with him to either bring him aboard or replace him. The EO office took the complaint, talked with me and all the NCOs, and told the CofC there was nothing to merit the complaint. It was dropped and nothing more was said. That NCO was also relieved by his next CofC and QMP'd out of the Army as an SSG with 17 years of service.

I went through a lot of mandatory training in my 23 years of service - some of it very good and some of it not so good. Again, it was all situationally dependent.

However - YMMV...and so it goes...

Richard :munchin