![]() |
Why?
Quote:
Shouldn't integration and team building start there? |
Cuba, are you familiar with the Marine Corps' month-long experiment?
http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/stor...ment/71979146/ This article isn't very detailed, but Google can help you find more about not just the failure of this experiment, but also the political decision by the Secretary of the Navy to completely ignore the results. |
Cuba,
Links below took about 2 minutes to find - this should get you started - keep looking. http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012...e-officer?lite http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Militar...omen-in-combat http://www.businessinsider.com/femal...etronio-2013-2 http://www.stripes.com/news/marines-...s-say-1.375210 https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42075.pdf http://www.cmrlink.org/content/women-in-combat http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...s-of/?page=all ETA: took another minute and found another worth a look. Good luck. http://journalistsresource.org/studi...search-roundup |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Except that they will then get brow beat for hitting a girl.
|
Quote:
|
Execute order just went out (approval of integration plans).
http://www.army.mil/standto/archive_...?s_cid=standto Quote:
|
Educating Soldiers and leaders and communicating on how gender integration increases the readiness of the Army
Indoctrination. What a bunch of nonsense.:rolleyes: |
Slight thread drift from gender to race indoctrination that has moved from our schools to our military. The divisiveness and indoctrination appear to know no bounds with the current political "leadership."
The "isms" we're wrong then and they are wrong now. Well, at least they admit to the unquestionable target of their bigotry for all to see. Judicial Watch: Documents Reveal US Army Indoctrinated Soldiers on Dangers of ‘White Privilege’ MARCH 09, 2016 Judicial Watch Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it obtained documents from the United States Department of the Army revealing that in April 2015, 400 soldiers in the 67th Signal Battalion at Fort Gordon, Georgia, were subjected to a “white privilege” briefing, including a PowerPoint presentation instructing the attendees: “Our society attaches privilege to being white and male and heterosexual …” “Outrageous – that is the only word to describe this type of raw racist indoctrination,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Obama administration undermines the morale of our military with morally repugnant ‘equal opportunity training’ that makes many soldiers feel unwelcome because they are the wrong sex, race, religion or aren’t part of a politically correct group.” <snip> http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-r...ite-privilege/ |
I really don't think that women will be a problem. One of the major Special Forces qualities/talents is the ability to improvise as the situation changes. Plan something for six months with your wife/girlfriend then, just as you are walking out the door , tell her plans have changed and you are going somewhere else. Tell me how that works out for you...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thank you for the article. Most of my research actually came from that Marine Corps study and a study by the US ARMY Medical Research department study on a 12 month deployment on a Stryker Brigade Combat Team. Here is a piece from my paper from this study which is pretty interesting and adds some information to this thread on women in combat. "Nonetheless, recent research by the U.S. Army Medical Research department shows the evidence clearly points out that women get injured much more frequently than men when completing the exact same tasks. This certainly brings to light the differences in the physiology between a man and a woman. The purpose of the study was to describe physical demands and musculoskeletal injuries (MSIs) among male and female soldiers of the 4/23 Infantry Battalion and 402nd Brigade Support Battalion. in a Stryker Brigade Combat Team during a 12-month deployment to Afghanistan. (Military Medicine, Vol. 180, Pg. 127) Here is a direct quote from the Military Medicine report on the results from page 127 on this study “The primary duty women engaged in was office work (47%), and for men, it was dismounted patrols (29%) (Fig. 2). Out of 536 men, 120 had MSIs (22%) resulted in limited duty. Out of 57 women, 22 had MSIs (39%) resulting in limited duty days. The mean limited duty time for women was 7.45 days/injury and for men, it was 12.93 days/injury. For men, the most commonly injured body region was the low back (32%) and for the women, it was also the low back (22%) and foot and ankle (22%) (Fig. 3). The self-reported activity associated with MSI for women was physical training (PT) (25%) and for men, it was contact with the enemy (23%)” Quote:
Thank you for this quote. This is exactly what I am looking for to add into the paper. Common sense and right to the point. Quote:
Thank you for the articles, I have used Katie Petronio in my paper and most of the articles are repeat information of articles and periodicals I have used for this paper. I really want to thank you for this one right here, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42075.pdf. This is a treasure that I will implement into the paper. Thanks again. |
Quote:
The military does NOT generate a profit unless you're a private defense contractor. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 13:31. |
Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®