Professional Soldiers ®

Professional Soldiers ® (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Soapbox (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=93)
-   -   Protecting the Second Amendment – Why all Americans Should Be Concerned (http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=40772)

Paslode 09-23-2023 17:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Badger52 (Post 677842)
California's 'High Capacity' Magazine Ban Ruled Unconstitutional Under Bruen

Today, Judge Benitez has, as expected, struck down the ban as clearly unconstitutional.
Here's the link to the decision. I happen to enjoy the BLUF approach of the Court, which states what is happening, literally "up front."



This is not the first time Justice Benitez has done liberty proud. So hand salute, and 3-fingers of something of his choosing.
:lifter

Now we'll get to see how Kali's new 11% Tax on guns and ammo holds up in court. It doesn't do into effect until July 1.2024 which is perfectly timed as the 2024 election will be getting hot and will give Newsome some talking points while he is on the campaign trail.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...-tax-guns-ammo

GratefulCitizen 09-24-2023 11:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paslode (Post 677846)
Now we'll get to see how Kali's new 11% Tax on guns and ammo holds up in court. It doesn't do into effect until July 1.2024 which is perfectly timed as the 2024 election will be getting hot and will give Newsome some talking points while he is on the campaign trail.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...-tax-guns-ammo

This could be a good opportunity to test Murdock v. Pennsylvania for the 2nd Amendment.
A win would lay the groundwork for eliminating the NFA.

Badger52 09-24-2023 15:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by GratefulCitizen (Post 677850)
This could be a good opportunity to test Murdock v. Pennsylvania for the 2nd Amendment.
A win would lay the groundwork for eliminating the NFA.

+1 Also, I remember that 11% as being the number in Germany for their Mehrwertsteuer. How appropriate.

Box 09-26-2023 09:28

I just think its hilarious that some of you folks actually think "law" has any thing whatsoever to do with this.

...or that the left has any intention of following a "law" that increases the amount of freedoms and liberties (aka privileges) bestowed upon those peasants subject to the decrees of King Brandon

Paslode 09-26-2023 14:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Box (Post 677865)
I just think its hilarious that some of you folks actually think "law" has any thing whatsoever to do with this.

...or that the left has any intention of following a "law" that increases the amount of freedoms and liberties (aka privileges) bestowed upon those peasants subject to the decrees of King Brandon

My mother has always said that with each new law you lose a little bit more freedom.

Badger52 09-26-2023 17:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paslode (Post 677869)
My mother has always said that with each new law you lose a little bit more freedom.

I like Heinlein's method:
Bi-cameral legislature. One body requires 2/3 to pass ANYthing. If it can't get that support, it's not needed. Second body is to review the first. If even 1/3 don't like the law, it's shit-canned forthwith.

GratefulCitizen 10-08-2023 13:43

ATF enjoined from enforcing machine gun laws against FRTs.
For now, FRTs are legal, and will likely remain legal unless Congress intervenes.

https://cdn0.thetruthaboutguns.com/w...80076.53.0.pdf

Box 10-10-2023 08:56

Just to keep everything in perspective - the "Gun Control Act of 1986" was not signed by a democrat.
The gun ban in the 90's could NOT have passed without signification republican participation.
The "re-imagining" of gun laws by the ATF from 2016 through 2020 did NOT happen without tacit support of the republican party.
This last little bit a bullshit "anti-crime" legislation couldn't have gotten through without signification republican support.

Unconstitutional gun control and the deteriorating civil liberties is one of the only bipartisan efforts we have in government.
Just like the war mongering democrats love to blame endless wars on the right, gun snatching republicans go to great lengths to blame all gun control on the right.

The 2d amendment to the bill of government approved privileges is cute but I believe it was the 46th POTUS that once said...

No rights are absolute.






But dont worry - eventually Bill Clinton'S wife will have all of you gun nuts rounded up and thrown in the same re-education camps as those deplorable Trump supporters.


Lets finish the job - reelect Brandon in 2028.

JimP 10-11-2023 04:13

"But dont worry - eventually Bill Clinton'S wife will have all of you gun nuts rounded up and thrown in the same re-education camps as those deplorable Trump supporters."


Yeah....not so much. Here's one gun nut that's not going to get on that train. I have a gun. They don't want me to have that gun. I refuse to give up my gun. Their move......

Phuc, they wanted to put us in camps for refusing an experimental "vaccine." This isn't too much of a jump. I'm perfectly OK going out defending the Constitution rather than dying in some nursing home and being used for "old people fights for the last of the Tapioca" on Thursday nights.

In fact, I'd MUCH rather go out that way.

GratefulCitizen 10-11-2023 09:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimP (Post 677959)
"But dont worry - eventually Bill Clinton'S wife will have all of you gun nuts rounded up and thrown in the same re-education camps as those deplorable Trump supporters."


Yeah....not so much. Here's one gun nut that's not going to get on that train. I have a gun. They don't want me to have that gun. I refuse to give up my gun. Their move......

Phuc, they wanted to put us in camps for refusing an experimental "vaccine." This isn't too much of a jump. I'm perfectly OK going out defending the Constitution rather than dying in some nursing home and being used for "old people fights for the last of the Tapioca" on Thursday nights.

In fact, I'd MUCH rather go out that way.

Don’t piss off old people.
The older we get, the less life in prison is a deterrent.

Speaking nursing homes…
https://babylonbee.com/news/elderly-...g-the-populace

bblhead672 10-11-2023 09:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Box (Post 677953)
Just to keep everything in perspective - the "Gun Control Act of 1986" was not signed by a democrat.

And it was endorsed by the NRA....Negotiated Rights Away.

Badger52 10-20-2023 04:16

Judge Benitez Strikes Again
 
LINK HERE to the District Court Decision telling CA that their AR-15 ban is unconstitutional, although it gives the Kali Regime ten days to appeal.

Interesting read and Judge Benitez tends to use quite a bit of normal people language in his decisions.
:cool:

Box 10-20-2023 06:29

Just a show of hands...

How many people think that the left gives two shits about a legal ruling that says their policies and legislation is unconstitutional?

The democratic peoples republic still lets you have an AR-15
it just has to have the bayonet lug removed
no barrel threads
no pistol grip
a stock that looks like it was made with a taffy puller
a magazine button
a magic bolt that micro-stamps a brief bio about your family history on the bottom of every shell casing fired from the gun
special taggants in the gun powder that identify the pronouns of everyone in the guns chain of custody
special administrative measures to make sure only the best citizens are purchasing firearms
special adherence to "common sense gun laws"
...for the children


hahahaha
"constitutional"
stop it - your words are tickling me






"The Second Amendment is not absolute"
- Joseph Robinette Biden

Badger52 10-31-2023 09:37

Stay against ATF Brace "rule" goes indefinite
 
BLUF: US District Court had, multiple times, extended the stay against the ATF's rule on pistol braces. Each one had a sunset in the form of a drop-dead date for the ATF to respond. They haven't so now he's extended it pending full resolution, or a higher overarching ruling.

Link for reference.
:rolleyes:

Quote:

The preliminary injunction issued Friday by Judge Tipton means the ATF cannot enforce the pistol brace rule against members of Gun Owners of America.
GOA are a party/plaintiff in the original lawsuit.

Box 10-31-2023 09:50

Quote:

The preliminary injunction issued Friday by Judge Tipton means the ATF cannot enforce the pistol brace rule against members of Gun Owners of America.

Great News !!!

But for the rest of American citizens that aren't members of the GOA or those that didn't join GOA until after GOA filed the law suit...
...you are cordially invited to continue eating your peas until your second amendment privileges have been re-granted since the judge thinks "the pistol-brace ban is likely unconstitutional"


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 19:16.


Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®