![]() |
...
|
Quote:
If I had to guess, I would call it a stick grenade, small mortar round, or rifle grenade. Appears to be less than 50mm in diameter, and judging from the corrosion, at least partially copper. Could be a 37mm or 40mm projo. FYI, WP rounds are normally base ejecting, if you can see the bottom and it is still closed, the round is likely not a WP. TR |
...
|
The Japanese also had some small "Knee Mortars" in the 52mm range that had lots of copper on the bottom of the Projo, of course in that condition, there is no way of knowing.
Cool Pics Gladan!, Keep em coming. Good times, Blake |
...
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yeah, but his pic does not appear to have the safety pins in it any more.:D TR |
If your EOD folks haven't already warned you, the Japanese used a LOT of Picric as the explosive filler!! That stuff, when combined with the metal casings, turns into some un-Godly sensitive explosives!!!
Take care. Martin |
We were on a demo range in Okinawa, EOD runs those ranges so they have to be there when we used them.
We're setting up and EOD walks up with a few " WWII satchel cherges" they had "found" in a bunker. On close inspection the bags were leaking clear liquid......:rolleyes: EOD asked us to be "gentle" in handling them.......:rolleyes: We tried to get the Jr. Weapons man to take one, run onto the demo range, pull a fuse igniter and throw it, fuze burning, while we took pictures, he wouldn't go for it.:D TS |
[QUOTEWe tried to get the Jr. Weapons man to take one, run onto the demo range, pull a fuse igniter and throw it, fuze burning, while we took pictures, he wouldn't go for it.:DTS[/QUOTE]
LOL - It was more than likely the fear of Ernie T finding out and kicking whats left of his ass........ |
...
|
I would not be moving that stuff around if it were not my job, but you are the one who has his ass on the line. What do you think usually causes the UXO to blow and injure civilians?
Grenades that have been activated and dudded are very bad, as are any munitions with a pizeo-electric type fuze (usually PIBD fuzed rounds). The 5"/38 round in question does not look that much different from the previous one, other than placement, what made it so dangerous? One M-112 Charge Block of C-4 should be sufficient, if properly placed, not sure why the first did not work, unless it were misplaced or not directly in contact with the UXO. I have seen several 155mm rounds blown with single blocks, and the 5"/38 is smaller. What it above the smoke plume in the last photo? Looks like a tire carcass. Did they put something over it as a tamp or damper? Maybe a bomb blanket? TR |
...
|
Quote:
Neither you, nor I, are competent to make a visual determination of what is inert, versus what is a very sensitive item. The problem here is that you can make 50 good decisions, or be lucky 50 times, and the next one kills you. Since handling ordnance is what kills civilians, it may be what kills you as well. I would take photos, give them my opinion, and keep the curious away, but I would not be moving items on my own that may have a 65 year old explosive filler and multiple triggers. Not your job, IMHO. That is why they get the extra money. There is either a typo, or a miscount in your charge list above. There are FOUR, not TWO M-112 charge blocks in the photo, that is a NEW of 5.0 pounds of C-4, NOT 2.5. It is also not configured as a counter-charge. Curious. Thanks for sharing, very interesting. TR |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 16:50. |
Copyright 2004-2026 by Professional Soldiers ®