Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > General Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-06-2016, 06:23   #1
Pete
Quiet Professional
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 13,080
Carter proposes sweeping changes to military command structure

Carter proposes sweeping changes to military command structure

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ca...rticle/2587717

"Defense Secretary Ash Carter is planning some major changes to how the military is organized in an effort to make it more agile and efficient, and more responsive to modern conflicts.

Carter on Tuesday previewed reforms he hopes to push forward this year to Goldwater Nichols, the 30-year-old law that governs how the military reports to the Pentagon and how geographic combatant commands are organized..."

You guys a little bit higher up on the food chain - good idea or not?

The below sounds good but....

"..."Instead of combining these commands to the detriment of our friends, our allies, and in fact our own command and control capabilities, we intend to be more efficient by integrating functions like logistics, intelligence, and plans across the Joint Staff, the combatant commands, and subordinate commands, eliminating redundancies wherever we find them without losing capability," he said...."
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2016, 07:42   #2
sinjefe
Quiet Professional
 
sinjefe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,989
I'll believe that there will be less GO/FOs when I see it. Just a bunch of deck chairs being rearranged to make it look like they are doing something "sweeping"
__________________
"Were you born a fat, slimy, scumbag, puke, piece 'o shit, Private Pyle, or did you have to work at it?" - GySgt Hartman
sinjefe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2016, 20:58   #3
Tree Potato
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NoVA
Posts: 171
Sounds like a move to insert the joint staff more directly in the chain of command and centralize control into the 5 sided correctional facility, probably through matrixed functions with the JS pulling the strings. What could go wrong?
Tree Potato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2016, 07:20   #4
Box
Quiet Professional
 
Box's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: State of Confusion
Posts: 5,903
It sounds like, instead of having 4-Stars reporting to the SecDef, the services can just have some 3-stars reporting to the Chairman...
...that will free up a lot of extra time for more important business if the SecDef does not have to deal directly with GCC issues any longer.

Then once his schedule is cleared up a bit, maybe we will finally get to see some meaningful progress on women, gays, and transgenders in direct combat roles and tactical/strategic leadership positions.

I think this will be good for everyone.
__________________
Opinions stated in this post are solely those of the author, and in no way reflect the opinions or policies of The Department of Defense, The United States Army, The Royal Canadian Mounted Police, The Screen Actors Guild, The Boy Scouts, The Good, The Bad, or The Ugly. These opinions are provided purely as overly sarcastic social commentary and are not meant to be used for mission planning or navigation.

"Make sure your own mask is secure before assisting others"
-Airplane Safety Briefing
Box is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:20.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies