05-02-2009, 14:45
|
#1
|
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Event Horizon...
Posts: 383
|
P2000sk 9mm Opionions needed
So I found a P2000sk V3 in 9mm with 2 mags and box for 700.00 at a gun store local to me.
Ive been looking at this gun and others of similar size for summer carry.
My EDC is a USPc .45 V1 which is a friggin nail driver that I just love. But I thought Id like to have something smaller in the heat and Id like for that something smaller to be another HK.
This particular gun is the exact gun and version I want only the caliber is 9mm.
So, is smaller caliber going to really make that much of a difference if I carry a good round?
Or should I go through the extra effort to get a V3 in .40 (not a big fan of this round yet)?
Thanks for any opinions-
|
|
ccrn is offline
|
|
05-02-2009, 21:20
|
#2
|
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 165
|
I am not a QP.
That being said, I carry a Glock 19 in 9mm. I use Winchester STX +P+.
INMHO shot placement and a larger capacity ease my woes when I would rather carry a larger caliber to deliver a potentially single fight stopping hit.
Again I have never had to use my weapon in self defense but I feel very comfortable with 9mm and being able to deliver fight stopping hits if need be.
__________________
It's not who I am, but what I do, that defines me.
|
|
Fiercely Loyal is offline
|
|
05-03-2009, 18:05
|
#3
|
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Event Horizon...
Posts: 383
|
I went and looked at this gun again and its a beauty.
Im leaning towards getting it with the idea of running Federal HST 147 grain through it.
Ive been looking at some of the studies about this including the old 1989 FBI Handgun Wound and Effectiveness paper with the idea that penetration is most important, and permanant cavitation second. I know these high performance rounds expand well in tests but even studies suggest that this cannot be counted on and is no replacment for mass.
I got this from a 2003 test using FBI protocol through heavy clothing:
Bullet Caliber/Weight/Penetration/ Expansion/ Retained Weight
Federal HST 45 ACP 230 gr. 14.0” 0.850” 99.65%
Federal HST 9mm 147 gr. 13.75” 0.689” 102.38%
Im still a .45ACP guy. But when faced with trying to conceal a smaller high quality firearm in warmer climes Im beginning to think this handgun is a good option despite prejudice against the caliber.
With that in mind I think I might liike this platform and round combined. Either that or its go with the Kahr or G36 at this point-
|
|
ccrn is offline
|
|
05-04-2009, 15:17
|
#4
|
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ft. Collins, CO
Posts: 117
|
There is a LOT of good information on ammunition choices in the ammo section of this forum. I don't believe that the 147 grain HST would be the preferred round. Everything I've read here and discovered through personal research has led me to believe that if you can't get a hold of LeMas ammo, and the other rounds similar to that, go with the Winchester 127 grain +P+ Ranger Talon.
|
|
Claemore is offline
|
|
05-04-2009, 16:00
|
#5
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: DFW Texas Area
Posts: 4,741
|
I believe that Swatsurgeon's recommendation, based on his seeing the "After-effects" are the Remington Golden Saber or Speer Gold Dots!!
__________________
Martin sends.
|
|
Ambush Master is offline
|
|
05-05-2009, 22:59
|
#6
|
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Event Horizon...
Posts: 383
|
Thanks for the comments guys I appreciate it.
The Federal HST 147gr comes at the recommendation of one of the senior SWAT guys local to me.
Obviously. if there is a round out there that is proven to be consistantly expanding in human tissue (and penetrating) I want to know about it, in any cailber!
I have a lot to learn when it comes to ammo and that journey has really just begun-
|
|
ccrn is offline
|
|
05-05-2009, 23:45
|
#7
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 178
|
I own a HK P2000sk and love it. Due to it's short barrel, it has a bit of a kick but it's perfect for conceal carry. The decocker in the v3 (no Leo version) is great. It's located so that you can decock with your firing hand rather than using your support hand.
My personal opinion on 9mm vs. .40 s&w vs. .45 acp is that they don't matter as much as your training. Any real bullet has the potential of destroying/killing your target, but it's the shot placement that will ensure it happens. Personally, I like 9mm and don't like .45 acp.
__________________
Sleepy
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" Bruce Campbell a.k.a Ash
|
|
sleepyhead4 is offline
|
|
05-06-2009, 05:38
|
#8
|
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 172
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccrn
I got this from a 2003 test using FBI protocol through heavy clothing:
Bullet Caliber/Weight/Penetration/ Expansion/ Retained Weight
Federal HST 45 ACP 230 gr. 14.0” 0.850” 99.65%
Federal HST 9mm 147 gr. 13.75” 0.689” 102.38%
|
How does the bullet retain more than its original weight?
__________________
Nobody said it would be easy, they said it would be worth it.
|
|
caveman is offline
|
|
05-06-2009, 06:22
|
#9
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brunswick Ga
Posts: 21
|
The P2000 (LE version) is used here at FLETC by the CBP. The 40 cal LEO version has a very sloppy trigger. We have trouble teaching these kids not to really start taking up the tigger until the move it about 2/3 of the way thru its travel to remove the slopp. If this is not done tigger jerk is terrible for most learning shooters. This also make learning trigger reset a little harder.
The gun also does not handle all 40 cal ammo. There are some major brands that we can not use. Certain lots would shoot about 6 inches right and 8 inches low at 7. It happened on 100s of guns. So make sure you pick the right ammo for your gun and put alot thru it.
They do make a short trigger for the P2000 that will remove the slopp but LEOs can not modify the guns.
The magizines also come apart much quicker than most when practicing emergency reloads on hard surfaces. So keep an eye on them, proper care and they work fine.
|
|
demodude is offline
|
|
05-06-2009, 07:42
|
#10
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,822
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by caveman
How does the bullet retain more than its original weight?
|
Temporary water weight gain.
TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910
De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
|
|
The Reaper is offline
|
|
05-06-2009, 08:54
|
#11
|
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 172
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reaper
Temporary water weight gain.
TR
|
Well played.
__________________
Nobody said it would be easy, they said it would be worth it.
|
|
caveman is offline
|
|
05-07-2009, 08:13
|
#12
|
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Event Horizon...
Posts: 383
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reaper
Temporary water weight gain.
TR
|
Nice one!
One thing the guys selling this are telling me is as long as I can get my little finger on the gun Ill be able to control it. Ive never heard that before. My little finger barely makes it onto the magazine baseplate.
Any thoughts on this?
|
|
ccrn is offline
|
|
06-20-2009, 14:52
|
#13
|
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Event Horizon...
Posts: 383
|
BTW I went ahead and bought this little gun so thought Id throw in a few comments about it.
Its quite a bit smaller than my USPc .45 and does conceal better.
I went to the range and put 300 rounds through it. Its a friggin nail driver just like its bigger brother and performed flawlessly.
I personally like the decocker on it better than my USPc V1. I dont have any problem decocking the USPc V1 or taking the safety off during presentation probably because I have bigger hands (and lots of dry fire), but the little decocker on the SK is closer and makes more sense to me.
Over all I like the USPc better not to mention the .45 round, but for a smaller chambered handgun the P2000sk V3 is an excellent choice if you are in fact going to carry a 9mm. I still carry the USPc 95% of the time, but in certain circumstances and applications the SK fits the bill and is a quality piece IMO-
__________________
-Air in, blood out-
|
|
ccrn is offline
|
|
06-24-2009, 12:30
|
#14
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southern Mo
Posts: 1,541
|
I bought this pistol to carry when I'm on the bench. Small enough that it is basically comfortable to carry concealed. Also, nice to know if you have to pull your hideout gun it's an HK
|
|
craigepo is offline
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03.
|
|
|