Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > TMC 14 > General Medical

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-09-2009, 10:36   #1
olhamada
Guerrilla
 
olhamada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Nashville
Posts: 310
Military Medicine and HealthCare Reform

Quote:
Originally Posted by NDD
In order to facilitate discussion at the appropriate level, when you post for the first time in this forum, please provide a brief introduction with your level of training, experience, and current medically-related position as applicable.
I am an MD (Family & Sports Medicine, and Obstetrics & Gynecologic Surgery). I was Director of Predoctoral Affairs while on faculty at the University of TN College of Medicine from 1995-2002, and am now an Associate Clinical Professor at Vanderbilt University's School of Medicine. I currently serve at Pfizer in the position of Director, Pfizer Global Medical, Pain & Inflammation. I have served as a national level speaker for the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and for Marcus-Evans, and am currently a speaker for the American Academy of Family Physicians and the Christian Medical and Dental Association.

On the military side, I was in the 230th MASH from 1989-1994, and then in the 1/20th SFG, (A) from 1994-2004. Training included Combat Casualty Care, Medical Management of Biological and Chemical, Flight Surgeon, Hyperbaric Medical Officer, and Diving Medical Officer. Of course, ABN and SCUBA as well.

So, my question is - A couple of days ago, I received an invitation to be the anchor speaker at Duke University's Fuqua School of Business on the topic of HealthCare Reform from a military perspective. We are still flushing this out in terms of topics, pertinent questions, etc.... I would love to have any input you might be willing to share given the vast experience on this board.

Given the recent failures of the VA system to provide adequate and ongoing care for our troops, and given the recent and worsening failures of our civilian healthcare here in the US, this is a very timely topic and should generate great discussion.

Here's the "tickler" from Duke:
Quote:
At the April 16-17, 2009 Health Sector Advisory Council meeting, Duke University, we will address health care reform focusing on Military and Combat Medicine. Speakers such as MAJ Omar L. Hamada, MD will consider pre-deployment requirements and logistics, in-theater functionality, past and present mechanisms and survivability of battlefield injuries, acute and chronic care and rehabilitation secondary to Traumatic Brain Injury, amputations, blast injuries, etc. The need to prepare soldiers for deployment, potential in-theater injuries, and post-deployment care has created opportunities for public and private sector innovation. All observers agree soldiers fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq have greater survivability due to innovative devices and therapeutics. Yet this improved survivorship has increased the challenge to make post-injury care accessible, high quality, affordable and sustainable. The discussion will focus on a variety of issues including delivery of services through private sector versus government sponsored models (VA). Speakers and panelists will also suggest how reforms for Military and Combat Medicine may foreshadow broader health care reform issues facing the new Obama administration and the 111th Congress.
The target audience will be C-level executives from GE, P&G, HCA, BCBS, Aetna, etc..., a couple of US congressmen, Duke Fuqua Business School faculty and students.

A few pertinent questions to help guide discussion:
- What specific things would you think about and want to have covered regarding the delivery of medical care in the pre-deployment phase?
- What changes have occurred in the past 50 years in terms of mechanisms of injury on the battlefield?
- What has improved the survivability of our soldiers?
- What are the implications of increased survivability with regard to chronic medical care and rehabilitation?
- How do we best prepare our soldiers to deal with their own and other soldiers' injuries on the battlefield?
- How do we maintain high quality and accessible care once the injured soldier has returned to CONUS?
- How can this translate into new paradigms for civilian healthcare delivery on a global scale?

Of course, any other thoughts or questions you have are certainly welcome!

I look forward to your input!
__________________
"And dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they'll never take our freedom?"- Braveheart

de Oppresso Liber

Last edited by olhamada; 01-09-2009 at 14:10.
olhamada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 18:03   #2
olhamada
Guerrilla
 
olhamada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Nashville
Posts: 310
Ok, I see this has really generated a ton of interest!

I know it's a long post, but most of it's background and intro. If any of the questions at the end spark any interest or thoughts, please let me know in a post or PM. Or if you know of anyone who might have the experience, background, and interest to contribute, please let me know. (Just spoke to D2 about it - prev USASOC Surg).

What we're trying to do is raise the visibility of Military/Combat Medicine, the plight of our wounded veterans, and figure out a way to help reform the civilian healthcare system.

Thanks for your time and attention!!
__________________
"And dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they'll never take our freedom?"- Braveheart

de Oppresso Liber
olhamada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 18:56   #3
jatx
Area Commander
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,355
My experiences are limited to those gained as a member of the ARNG with a LOD injury, but I would say the provider network of Tricare needs to be addressed if you want to ensure good pre- and post-deployment healthcare for reserve component soldiers outside the catchment area of a major MTF.

While MMSO attempts to coordinate our care, this involves paying for services received from a Tricare network provider. In some areas, the physician quality is excellent. I had a surgery performed in the Portland area last spring, and the network included most of the specialists offered by my private health insurance.

However, here in Dallas, TX, the situation is very different. Because no qualified specialists were available in-network, I recently spent $13,000 out of pocket for surgical revision rather than going to an unqualified provider. How many troops can do that?

In fact, I was recently looking at the Reserve Select health insurance offering, given its very low premiums, and decided not to go that route because of the network quality. From a list of 17 physicians whom I or a close friend have used, exactly zero accept Tricare. It's a pretty sad state of affairs.
__________________
"Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave whither Thou goest." - Ecclesiastes 9:10

"If simple folk are free from care and fear, simple they will be, and we must be secret to keep them so." - JRRT
jatx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 19:02   #4
JJ_BPK
Quiet Professional
 
JJ_BPK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 18 yrs upstate NY, 30 yrs South Florida, 20 yrs Conch Republic, now chasing G-Kids in NOVA & UK
Posts: 11,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by olhamada View Post
Ok, I see this has really generated a ton of interest!

What we're trying to do is raise the visibility of Military/Combat Medicine, the plight of our wounded veterans, and figure out a way to help reform the civilian healthcare system.

Thanks for your time and attention!!
Doc
I am not in the health care business, so I will not attempt to add.

My observations are based on your note.

1)Your asking for input from BTDT people that are at the start of the process, yet your attempting to fix the other end,, VA care???

2)Your audience for the presentation does not include the very people that own the problem,, the VA??

3)The other target "will be C-level executives from GE, P&G, HCA, BCBS, Aetna, etc..., a couple of US congressmen, Duke Fuqua Business School faculty and students" have very little to do with the problem nor the solution, with the exception of
Quote:
a couple of US congressmen
Given your target audience and the fact that they will have probably ZERO background in war zone medicine.. I can only conclude,, and again,, based on your initial post, that the meeting is more based on money and less on actual care given. The lack of care giving medical professionals in your audience,, and the abundance of business, insurance, managerial professionals,, asks the question,, WHY???


Another point, you appear to have a bias view of both the VA and national medical system. Not a good way to start an open-minded conversation about change.

Quote:
Given the recent failures of the VA system to provide adequate and ongoing care for our troops, and given the recent and worsening failures of our civilian healthcare here in the US, this is a very timely topic and should generate great discussion.
If I have misunderstood your post, sorry...
__________________
Go raibh tú leathuair ar Neamh sula mbeadh a fhios ag an diabhal go bhfuil tú marbh

"May you be a half hour in heaven before the devil knows you’re dead"
JJ_BPK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 19:17   #5
FMF DOC
Guerrilla
 
FMF DOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 419
Here is my small 2 cents worth on the VA where I happen to work. Although the people down in trench's who actually care for and treat our veterans are tremendous. The VA as whole and our government are just covering their behinds with all this Brain Injury stuff, PTSD, and Wounded Warrior care. Here is what I witness. A veterans checks in and is registered with the VA which is what you are suppost to do once you have been discharge. They are given a survey to cover the above mentioned and this is done so they can put a check in the box when the VA reports back that they caring for the servicemen returning home. They are set up for a physical and little is done after that. All the VA is required to do is that initial exam after the veteran registers. Something needs to be put in place to make sure that we are not just checking the box's for some governement report and our veterans are getting continious care.
I don't think this is the type of response you were looking for but like I said this is what I see happening to our veterans that are returning from harm's way.
__________________
Sometimes you must do dark things to get to the light. "unknown"
FMF DOC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 11:06   #6
Red Flag 1
Area Commander
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,952
below

Last edited by Red Flag 1; 03-17-2018 at 08:50. Reason: clarity.
Red Flag 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 11:55   #7
greenberetTFS
Quiet Professional (RIP)
 
greenberetTFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Carriere,Ms.
Posts: 6,922
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Flag 1 View Post
What is YOUR goal at this talk? Or is that what you are looking for from this board?

Given the venue, this looks to be a dollars and cents issue, and not so much medical care from any arena. If you condider that Med care in the military is socalized medicine with civillian back up, it suggests that your audience wants to learn about high energy socalized medicine.IMHO.

The VA system generally gets a bum rap. The VA is socalized medical care. I agree with JJ in presuming that the VA is a failing system is a hole you may have to dig yourself out of, IMHO.

Lastly, do you believe that Medicine practiced by the military is applicable to general health care in the USA? Active military populace is generally healthy and "in shape". Very little chronic issues in active duty military population. If you want to examine long term care for the military patients, I give you the VA. On a nationwide level, I give you Canada.

Perhaps an MBA, along with your other quals, would be plus at your upcoming event. Have you vetted with TS yet?

RF 1
Good points RF1.............

GB TFS
__________________
I believe that SF is a 'calling' - not too different from the calling missionaries I know received. I knew instantly that it was for me, and that I would do all I could to achieve it. Most others I know in SF experienced something similar. If, as you say, you HAVE searched and read, and you do not KNOW if this is the path for you --- it is not....
Zonie Diver

SF is a calling and it requires commitment and dedication that the uninitiated will never understand......
Jack Moroney

SFA M-2527, Chapter XXXVII
greenberetTFS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 12:21   #8
JJ_BPK
Quiet Professional
 
JJ_BPK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 18 yrs upstate NY, 30 yrs South Florida, 20 yrs Conch Republic, now chasing G-Kids in NOVA & UK
Posts: 11,901
I said I'd not discuss the medical side as I am not in the profession..

I am a receiver of services,, in that I have a 30% service connected, combat disability,, for 39 years. I was also active in the VFW and made many monthly visits to the VA hospital in Miami.

Let me be very clear,, I hate socialized anything to include medicine. I also think the VA system needs a lot of work.

A major part of VA failure is the fact that we have let it become a bureaucratic monster incapable of delivering it's intended mission.

Like all socialized institutions, it has built a hi-archy based on unfitted consumption of money and resources, with little or no care for it's targeted product, and it festers unabated..

Why?? Because the VA is responsibly for a small portion of the population with little political clout.

Additionally, socialists, who can care less about Vets,, are more than willing to use it as a stepping stone for the nationalization of the US medical system..

The Veteran is only used in the context of appropriations,, not the services rendered.

When the VA was initiated, there was a need to help returning veterans integrate back into a society that would shortly fall into world depression.

Quote:
www.va.gov/facmgt/historic/brief_va_history.asp
Congress established a new system of veterans benefits when the United States entered World War I in 1917. Included were programs for disability compensation, insurance for service persons and veterans, and vocational rehabilitation for the disabled. By the 1920s, the various benefits were administered by three different Federal agencies: the Veterans Bureau, the Bureau of Pensions of the Interior Department, and the National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers.
It has turned it's back on the veteran. The VA slinks thru the halls of the capital buildings in DC, with it's hand out. It provides just enough feed-back to curry favors from the Congressman & Senators responsible for funding, who in turn, spew great verbiage to the populace, while raising our taxes...

If you target is national socialized medicine,, we will end up like the UK and Canada,, a bureaucratic morass that can only consume and will not die...

My $00.0002

end of rant.....

Well almost,,, I should also add that ALL veterans with service connected disabilities, whether it was combat related or not, are not in a welfare line. These people had a contract with the US government for medical insurance for services rendered.. They deserve nothing but the best... They are not getting what they deserve...
__________________
Go raibh tú leathuair ar Neamh sula mbeadh a fhios ag an diabhal go bhfuil tú marbh

"May you be a half hour in heaven before the devil knows you’re dead"

Last edited by JJ_BPK; 01-16-2009 at 15:28.
JJ_BPK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2009, 17:44   #9
Red Flag 1
Area Commander
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,952
if it worth saying, it will be quoted.

Last edited by Red Flag 1; 03-17-2018 at 08:50.
Red Flag 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 18:21   #10
olhamada
Guerrilla
 
olhamada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Nashville
Posts: 310
Quote:
Originally Posted by jatx View Post
However, here in Dallas, TX, the situation is very different. Because no qualified specialists were available in-network, I recently spent $13,000 out of pocket for surgical revision rather than going to an unqualified provider. How many troops can do that?

In fact, I was recently looking at the Reserve Select health insurance offering, given its very low premiums, and decided not to go that route because of the network quality. From a list of 17 physicians whom I or a close friend have used, exactly zero accept Tricare. It's a pretty sad state of affairs.
jatx, I feel your pain - and that's one of the issues we are trying to deal with. The costs of healthcare have become completely uncontrollable and irrational. We have to find a way to provide high quality healthcare with reasonable access to our citizens without breaking either their budgets or the national budget while preserving choice, autonomy, and quality. With tens of millions unable to afford insurance and the costs of healthcare approaching 18% of GNP, something's got to be done, but no one knows how to fix it - yet.
__________________
"And dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they'll never take our freedom?"- Braveheart

de Oppresso Liber
olhamada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 18:37   #11
olhamada
Guerrilla
 
olhamada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Nashville
Posts: 310
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ_BPK View Post
1)Your asking for input from BTDT people that are at the start of the process, yet your attempting to fix the other end,, VA care???

2)Your audience for the presentation does not include the very people that own the problem,, the VA??

3)The other target "will be C-level executives from GE, P&G, HCA, BCBS, Aetna, etc..., a couple of US congressmen, Duke Fuqua Business School faculty and students" have very little to do with the problem nor the solution, with the exception of a couple of US Congressmen.

Given your target audience and the fact that they will have probably ZERO background in war zone medicine.. I can only conclude,, and again,, based on your initial post, that the meeting is more based on money and less on actual care given. The lack of care giving medical professionals in your audience,, and the abundance of business, insurance, managerial professionals,, asks the question,, WHY???


Another point, you appear to have a bias view of both the VA and national medical system. Not a good way to start an open-minded conversation about change.



If I have misunderstood your post, sorry...

JJ BPK, great questions.

1) The focus is really to start a discussion with the hope of helping to fix both the civilian and VA systems through dialogue.

2) True - this is targeted more at the civilian sector who want to learn from the VA - both from the good and the bad.

3) Again true - if we're talking about the VA alone. However, in this, the VA system will be used as a model from which we hope to learn from both the failures and the successes. On the civilian side, these are the decision makers.

4) WHY? Because doctors and other healthcare providers no longer run anything. It's the pharma companies, the insurance agencies, the hospital corporations, and the government that hold the reigns, spend the money, allow and disallow services, etc... Healthcare is funny - it is both a right and a commodity - sort of a hybrid. Without buy-in from those that make the profits and control the bank we are hopelessly adrift in a very deep sea that will sink our economy if not controlled.

The thing driving healthcare right now are the enormous profits these companies are making on the backs of our ill. Another problem is that we have made doctors double minded by telling them to treat patients, but document and code appropriately so that they get reimbursed for the services they provide. So we have taken physician's eyes off the patient and put them on billing and collecting. That can't be good for the patient or the doctor.

Re bias - I worked in the VA system for several years through med school and residency, and I'm sure we all remember the issues at Walter Reed from a couple of years ago. The VA has incredible systems and processes in place, but also suffers from a lack of efficiency and has a few quality issues.
__________________
"And dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they'll never take our freedom?"- Braveheart

de Oppresso Liber
olhamada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 18:39   #12
olhamada
Guerrilla
 
olhamada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Nashville
Posts: 310
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ_BPK View Post
I said I'd not discuss the medical side as I am not in the profession..

I am a receiver of services,, in that I have a 30% service connected, combat disability,, for 39 years. I was also active in the VFW and made many monthly visits to the VA hospital in Miami.

Let me be very clear,, I hate socialized anything to include medicine. I also think the VA system needs a lot of work.

A major part of VA failure is the fact that we have let it become a bureaucratic monster incapable of delivering it's intended mission.

Like all socialized institutions, it has built a hi-archy based on unfitted consumption of money and resources, with little or no care for it's targeted product, and it festers unabated..

Why?? Because the VA is responsibly for a small portion of the population with little political clout.

Additionally, socialists, who can care less about Vets,, are more than willing to use it as a stepping stone for the nationalization of the US medical system..

The Veteran is only used in the context of appropriations,, not the services rendered.

When the VA was initiated, there was a need to help returning veterans integrate back into a society that would shortly fall into world depression.



It has turned it's back on the veteran. The VA slinks thru the halls of the capital buildings in DC, with it's hand out. It provides just enough feed-back to curry favors from the Congressman & Senators responsible for funding, who in turn, spew great verbiage to the populace, while raising our taxes...

If you target is national socialized medicine,, we will end up like the UK and Canada,, a bureaucratic morass that can only consume and will not die...

My $00.0002

end of rant.....

Well almost,,, I should also add that ALL veterans with service connected disabilities, whether it was combat related or not, are not in a welfare line. These people had a contract with the US government for medical insurance for services rendered.. They deserve nothing but the best... They are not getting what they deserve...

I completely agree with everything you said. It looks like you share my bias.

I would hate to see us convert to a socialized medical system, but I don't see any other option. Do you? if we could get all external parties disengaged from the heart of healthcare and plug them into the periphery, then we'd go a long way in fixing the problem. We need to return the physician-patient relationship to the center. However, there are too many parties interested in making $5000/ER visit (for example) to fix this.
__________________
"And dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they'll never take our freedom?"- Braveheart

de Oppresso Liber

Last edited by olhamada; 01-19-2009 at 18:52.
olhamada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 18:48   #13
olhamada
Guerrilla
 
olhamada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Nashville
Posts: 310
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Flag 1 View Post
What is YOUR goal at this talk? Or is that what you are looking for from this board?

Given the venue, this looks to be a dollars and cents issue, and not so much medical care from any arena. If you consider that Med care in the military is socalized medicine with civillian back up, it suggests that your audience wants to learn about high energy socalized medicine.IMHO.

The VA system generally gets a bum rap. The VA is socalized medical care. I agree with JJ in presuming that the VA is a failing system is and may be another hole you may have to dig yourself out of, IMHO.

Lastly, do you believe that Medicine practiced by the military is applicable to general health care in the USA? Active military populace is generally healthy and "in shape". Very little chronic issues in active duty military population. If you want to examine long term care for the military patients, I give you the VA. On a nationwide level, I give you Canada.

Perhaps an MBA, along with your other quals, would be plus at your upcoming event. Have you vetted with TS yet?

In that you have come to this board for advice, perhaps you could share with us the position of your employer Pfizer. What is their goal for your presentation at the Duke School of Buisness?

RF 1
In terms of my goal, I hope to utilize the successes we've had in healthcare delivery through the VA system, and make suggestions that would assist those in attendance in reforming the civilian sector.

Re your second point - EXCELLENT. You may be correct. I hadn't thought about that.

i don't think the VA system is a failing system, though I do think it has many areas which could be strengthened. Our civilian system is failing and cannot be sustained in it's present state. How do we fix it? That's the question. How do you handle something that's both a right and a commodity?

Re your fourth point about health status of civilians versus military - also an excellent factor to seriously consider. Thanks!

The MBA - Hmmmmm. That's something I've been trying to convince my wife of for years.

Re Pfizer's position - I was not invited nor am I speaking as a Pfizer employee, but as a physician with experience in healthcare reform as well as academic medicine, private practice, industry, and the military. So, though they are aware of the fact that I am speaking, they have not tried to influence my opinions or talking points.
__________________
"And dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they'll never take our freedom?"- Braveheart

de Oppresso Liber
olhamada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2009, 01:11   #14
jasonglh
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 332
My fathers doc has retreated back to working through the VA clinic because of the high cost of malpractice for surgeons. Can't say we are overly impressed with the VA clinic but he has seen the same surgeon for 25 years and does not wish to change. If he has not gone back to operating out of the VA he said he would have been forced to retire as he couldn't afford his malpractice any more. That is not something I have heard from just him my own doc is on the fence about continuing his practice next year. Every year the govt and insurance takes a larger bite so why keep working?

Tort reform is needed but most politicians are lawyers so what are the odds?

Lawsuits are driving malpractice insurance up and these billion dollar payouts by the drug companies are why my copays are now $60 per script.

As I understand it America is one of the few places that allows direct marketing of prescription drugs to consumers?

I see lots of elderly cardiac patients suckered by new drugs that combine their 2 old pills together in an easy to take single pill. Now this new pill is going to cost them when they could get the old ones as generic for $4 each at Walmart.

I'm just an RN in Kentucky and have only worked at 2 ICU's but both hospitals I worked for do not turn away any patients. Maybe in the bigger cities that is a problem but not here the patient comes first and they worry about billing later. Granted a few months ago we got a memo saying were using too many trashbags so money is tight but....

I wonder what the ratio of bean counters/managers to MD/RN runs at the VA vs private hospitals.
__________________
Victory is the only end that justifies the sacrifice of men at war.

Col. Robert W. Black
jasonglh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2009, 12:24   #15
Red Flag 1
Area Commander
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,952
if it worth saying, it will be quoted.

Last edited by Red Flag 1; 03-17-2018 at 08:51.
Red Flag 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 17:57.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies