An Open Letter to Khizr Khan

[abc_123]

And another (different) open letter.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/...hizr-khan.html


Yeah Khan is an idiot and part of the problem.

[ddoering]

Originally Posted by Divemaster

Just wait until he gets the IRS to use as a weapon against his enemies. We've already gotten a taste of that under Obama.

I look forward to it.

[TWITCHY]

Apparently, the political leadership in Texas hates Trump enough that they can't call a spade, a spade. It is vividly evident, even without reading Khan's back story that he is a political insurgent working to further his shitty Islamic agenda. And, after reading the above posts and links, Trump was probably right that The Khan's practice of sharia prevents his wife from talking in public.

http://m.amarillo.com/news/2016-08-0...ldiers-family#

[Golf1echo]

Originally Posted by abc_123

And another (different) open letter.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/...hizr-khan.html


Yeah Khan is an idiot and part of the problem.

Looks like he worked long and hard to be that tool, his son not the case....RIP with the Honor earned in the field, Hoah.

[Badger52]

Originally Posted by PRB

Emotional non thinking reaction.

ISIS seems to agree with you; they're tired of not getting the respect they feel they deserve I guess.

[frostfire]

I saw Chris Matthew "hardball" interview with KK

He asked what did he think as a muslim of US campaign in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, all muslim nations.

I thought the interview was heading in the right direction. Instead, it became a fellatio session of Khizr placating Chris on his opinion of Iraq war.

I wished Chris had asked what do you think of our non-muslim soldiers, kuffar or infidel in your Islamic viewpoint, who kill muslims in service of this Nation. Do they deserve to be killed? Did Hasan do the right thing in your view?

He publicly attacked a man known to have only one tact, the bull in China shop variant, and now cry foul when he got the horn? Even saying on hardball that they did not expect a response from Trump? Seriously? His using the wife as a shield from Trump's "bullets" reminds me of jihadists' shooting behind their wives. As always, the bleeding-heart-emotion-driven Americans fall for the Маскировка

[Patrin]

Originally Posted by ddoering

I look forward to it.

[Badger52]

Originally Posted by frostfire

As always, the bleeding-heart-emotion-driven Americans fall for the Маскировка

The deception is one of the bleeding hearts' own making. There is no ambiguity about the evil ones at all.

[Old Dog New Trick]

This thing has gone "beyond stupid" and as far as I'm concerned, now, fuck the Khan family. They stepped in it; now lick the poop off your shoes. HRC and more likely BHO brought you and your son into this but now, you own it! Live with the consequences.

[abc_123]

Originally Posted by Old Dog New Trick

This thing has gone "beyond stupid" and as far as I'm concerned, now, fuck the Khan family. They stepped in it; now lick the poop off your shoes. HRC and more likely BHO brought you and your son into this but now, you own it! Live with the consequences.

I agree. Dad Khan is at best, a useful idiot. At worst, yet another in a long line of muslim apologists who is no more assimilated than Tokyo Rose.

[tonyz]

They must be hiding that whole religion of peace shtick...oh, and they state that ISIS is Islamic and at the very end of the article they also touch on the subject of this thread.


ISIS details 'Why We Hate You' in new magazine
Published August 01, 2016 FoxNews.com

In the new edition of its full-color, glossy magazine, ISIS mocks those who claim Islam is a peaceful religion, and even wades into the controversy surrounding Donald Trump and the parents of a dead Muslim U.S. soldier.

The 15th issue of Dabiq, published on July 31, is titled “Break The Cross” and appears to be primarily directed at those that ISIS considers its enemies, particularly Christians. One section is devoted to the words and actions of Pope Francis and is headlined “In The Words Of Our Enemies.” An editorial titled “Why We Hate You and Why We Fight You” takes aim at Westerners and “apostate ‘Imams’ in the West” who refuse to define ISIS’ motivation as being Islamic. ISIS calls this rhetoric purely political.

“Many Westerners, however, are already aware that claiming the attacks of the mujahidin to be senseless and questioning incessantly as to why we hate the West and why we fight them is nothing more than a political act and a propaganda tool,” the article says. “The politicians will say it regardless of how much it stands in opposition to facts and common sense just to garner as many votes as they can for the next election cycle.”

The ISIS author of the “Why We Hate You” piece aims to settle the argument, and “clarify” in “unequivocal terms” that ISIS is Islamic. The author says that those on the “social fringe” who identify Islam with ISIS are correct.

There are exceptions among the disbelievers, no doubt, people who will unabashedly declare that jihad and the laws of the Shari’ah – as well as everything else deemed taboo by the Islam-is-a-peaceful-religion crowd – are in fact completely Islamic, but they tend to be people with far less credibility who are painted as a social fringe, so their voices are dismissed and a large segment of the ignorant masses continues believing the false narrative,” the article says.

Showing just how quickly the magazine was produced – and how intently members of ISIS watch U.S. politics – an image in the publication shows the grave of Capt. Humayun Khan, who was killed in Iraq in 2004. Khan’s parents rebuked Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump during a speech at the Democratic National Convention last week, prompting Trump, in turn, to criticize their “right” to censure him in front of a national audience. Adding its own voice to the debate, ISIS declares in a caption below Khan’s grave that the soldier is an “apostate” of the Muslim religion and urges other Muslims to “beware” a similar fate.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/08...-magazine.html

[Team Sergeant]

Using your military family members death for charity purposes, I get that.

Using your military family members death to protest a war, I can understand that too.

But using your "muslim" son's death for purely political purposes, to denigrate one political party while attempting to boost another, = bottom-feeding parents and a bottom-feeding political party.

This only demonstrates that the democratic national party, progressive socialists, are nothing more than bottom-feeding rats that know no boundaries.

A vote for the DNC is a vote for islam, screw all other beliefs.

[Badger52]

Originally Posted by tonyz

They must be hiding that whole religion of peace shtick...oh, and they state that ISIS is Islamic and at the very end of the article they also touch on the subject of this thread.

Thanks for the text of the link I mentioned above (sometimes FNC moves their stuff around). They (ISIS) are what... feelin' like Rodney Dangerfield? I know... they got pissed when they got referred to as a JV team. Their magazine has more creds in their circle than any WH presser, with anyone, for-e-vuh.

[Hand]

Originally Posted by PRB

My comments..

I found this to be a very well thought out post PRB. I found this:

As to Mr. Khan....what was his point....that all Muslims are not Jihadi's?
I think we all understand that...all Muslims are not violent nor do they practice full Islam, only the parts they cherry pick. Not all Muslims desire sharia. I wish all Muslims believed as that.

Are we to believe tho, that because Mr. Khans fine son was patriotic that all Muslims are so? Are we to believe from his sons sacrifice that all Muslims are not Islamists? I wish it were so.

to be an especially rich topic for discussion, and tastefully articulated as well.

Following in the same vein, all gun owners are not crazed, white, religious, racists, lone wolf militants, yet, one cannot assume that because most are, that all are.

I think it's also interesting to consider, how, if even possible, to apply a set of rules to a set of people, and without err, determine if they will, in the future, become dangerous.

Not only is this dangerous, but I believe it is probably unethical at some level and illegal as well (see Minority Report for the slippery slope side of the argument).

What are we left with other than completely outlawing guns, or outlawing the practice of a religion. While most here would completely disagree with the first (and rightfully so given the Second Amendment), doesn't the First Amendment protect the second just as fervently?

I would argue that immigrants/aliens/refugees etc, are not granted the rights of American citizens, and thus are eligible for whatever the government decides to do with them. But what about those who have completed the process legally, and have raised their right hand and sworn allegiance to the United States?

In becoming a citizen, and gaining the rights afforded by our Constitution, how can we restrict their First Amendment rights if we can't prove without any reasonable doubt that new citizen mohammed X will never become "radicalized"?

[Sdiver]

Hummm ... Looks like Hillary's "Khan Man" is attempting to cover his tracks.

It is being reported that he has deleted his Law Firm's Website, that specialized in Muslim immigration.

I'll bet ya he's deleting emails too ....

Panic Mode: Khizr Khan Deletes Law Firm Website that Specialized in Muslim Immigration

Khizr Khan, the Muslim Gold Star father that Democrats and their allies media wide have been using to hammer GOP presidential nominee Donald J. Trump, has deleted his law firm’s website from the Internet.

This development is significant, as his website proved—as Breitbart News and others have reported—that he financially benefits from unfettered pay-to-play Muslim migration into America.

A snapshot of his now deleted website, as captured by the Wayback Machine which takes snapshots archiving various websites on the Internet, shows that as a lawyer he engages in procurement of EB5 immigration visas and other “Related Immigration Services.”

The website is completely removed from the Internet, and instead directs visitors to the URL at which it once was to a page parking the URL run by GoDaddy.

The EB5 program, which helps wealthy foreigners usually from the Middle East essentially buy their way into America, is fraught with corruption. U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) has detailed such corruption over the past several months, and in February issued a blistering statement about it.

“Maybe it is only here on Capitol Hill—on this island surrounded by reality—that we can choose to plug our ears and refuse to listen to commonly accepted facts,” Grassley said in a statement earlier this year. “The Government Accountability Office, the media, industry experts, members of congress, and federal agency officials, have concurred that the program is a serious problem with serious vulnerabilities. Allow me to mention a few of the flaws.”

Grassley’s statement even noted that the program Khan celebrated on his website has posed national security risks.

“There are also classified reports that detail the national security, fraud and abuse. Our committee has received numerous briefings and classified documents to show this side of the story,” Grassley said in the early February 2016 statement. “The enforcement arm of the Department of Homeland Security wrote an internal memo that raises significant concerns about the program. One section of the memo outlines concerns that it could be used by Iranian operatives to infiltrate the United States. The memo identifies seven main areas of program vulnerability, including the export of sensitive technology, economic espionage, use by foreign government agents and terrorists, investment fraud, illicit finance and money laundering.”

Khan spoke alongside his wife Ghazala Khan at the Democratic National Convention last week in Philadelphia, and they were honoring their son U.S. Army Captain Humayun Khan—a hero who lost his life to a suicide bomber in Iraq in 2004. On behalf of Hillary Rodham Clinton, the Democratic nominee for president, Khizr Khan ripped into Donald Trump’s policies on immigration—specifically bashing his plan to bar Muslim migration from regions afflicted with rampant terrorism into America temporarily until the United States can figure out what’s going on.

Khan even brought out a pocket Constitution, claiming inaccurately that Trump’s plans were unconstitutional. That’s not true, as Congress has already granted such power to the president under the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952—allowing the president to bar migration of any alien or class of aliens the president sees as a threat to the United States for any reason at any time. Such a class of aliens could be Muslims, or it could be people from a specific region of the world, or any other class—such as someone’s race, weight, height, age, national origin, religion, or anything else.

The media, along with Hillary Clinton and her supporters throughout the Democratic Party establishment, has pushed the line of attack against Trump for days. Now on Tuesday, President Barack Obama has said that Trump is “unfit” to serve as President over the matter. Even a group of anti-Trump congressional Republicans has gone after Trump on the matter.

But as Breitbart News and other new media have exposed Khan’s various deep political and legal connections to the Clintons—and to Muslim migration—the attack line has crumbled. Now, with Khan deleting his website in an apparent effort to hide his biographical information, the attack is falling apart even more.

What’s perhaps interesting is that also on this website that he has now deleted, Khan revealed that he spent nearly a decade working for the mega-D.C. law firm Hogan & Hartson—now Hogan Lovells LLP—which connects him directly with the government of Saudi Arabia and the Clintons themselves. Saudi Arabia, which has retained the firm that Khan worked at for years, has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation. Hillary Clinton, despite the repeated urging of Trump, has refused to return the Clinton Cash money to the Saudis. What’s more, Hogan Lovells also did Hillary Clinton’s taxes—and helped acquire the patents for parts of the technology she used in crafting her illicit home-brew email server that the FBI director called “extremely careless” in handling classified information.

What’s more, the entire mainstream has proven negligence with regard to this matter as none of them even thought to look into this Khan guy’s law practice before bandying him about as some kind of magic elixir that cures the country of Trump.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presid...lim-migration/