Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > Area Studies > Europe

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2011, 12:00   #1
akv
Area Commander
 
akv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA-Germany
Posts: 1,572
Does Nato have a purpose any longer?

Quote:
Does Nato have a purpose any longer?

US defence secretary Robert Gates is right to be worried about the alliance's future
The Observer, Sunday 12 June 2011

It is an irony of history that it should be a departing US defence secretary, Robert Gates, who should break a long taboo and pronounce Nato faces a "dim, if not dismal future", as he did on Friday while delivering a valedictory address.

The US has made no secret in the last few years of its frustrations with some of its European partners in the transatlantic mutual defence pact, not least over Afghanistan. But to make this bleak assessment as the organisation is involved in two wars signals a highly significant moment for an organisation three-quarters of whose funding comes from the US. Indeed, as Gates pointed out, only five of the 28 members – the US, Britain, France, Greece and Albania –spend the 2% of GDP on defence as required by the organisation.

In venting American anger, Gates has articulated the existential questions that have been hanging over Nato since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 when its primary purpose evaporated: what is Nato for and can it actually deliver?

Founded in 1949 as a mutual defence pact, it has only once in more than 60 years of history invoked its Article 5 which deems an attack on one member an attack on all and then only largely symbolically after 9/11. Instead, one of the few things Nato has pursued aggressively is attempting to justify its own existence in ever more imaginative ways.

Lacking the clear central purpose that once united it in the aftermath of the Second World War – protecting Europe from the threat of Soviet aggression – it has struggled to find agreement among its members on the roles it has defined for itself. Indeed, what operations Nato has conducted in recent years have either been controversial, such as the bombing of Belgrade in 1999 – hardly impressive – or have provided little more than political cover for US-led military campaigns.

In Afghanistan, faced with a Taliban not yet ready to sue for peace, the performance of troop-contributing countries to the Nato mission has been marked by huge disparities in their willingness to share the burden of the fighting.

In Libya, as Gates sharply remarked on Friday with a hint of sarcasm, "the mightiest military alliance in history is only 11 weeks into an operation against a poorly armed regime… yet many allies are beginning to run short of munitions, requiring the US to make up the difference". On the same day – as if to underline Gates's point – Norway announced it was withdrawing unilaterally from Nato's Libyan operation on 1 August.

Its other front of activity – the ill thought-through policy of expanding membership east to the Russian border – has not fared much better, hitting the skids after Georgia initiated a hopeless five-day war in South Ossetia with Russian forces. The reality is that Nato feels like an anachronism, risk-averse, bloated and militarily inefficient, whose purpose increasingly has been usurped by so-called "coalitions of the willing".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...nato-usa/print
__________________
"Men Wanted: for Hazardous Journey. Small wages, bitter cold, long months of complete darkness, constant danger, safe return doubtful. Honour and recognition in case of success.” -Sir Ernest Shackleton

“A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.” –Greek proverb
akv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 14:55   #2
Peteyboy
Asset
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 30
I think it still has a purpose, I just think alot of the member countries are falling short of their responsibilities and duties to that purpose.
Peteyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 15:35   #3
Richard
Quiet Professional
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 15,370
I see NATO and the WEU as being in a period of feasible mission transition similar to that experienced by the American NG and Reserve force post-GW1.

Richard
__________________
“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)… There are just some kind of men who – who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.” - To Kill A Mockingbird (Atticus Finch)

“Almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.” - Robert Heinlein
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 19:41   #4
Red Flag 1
Area Commander
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peteyboy View Post
I think it still has a purpose, I just think alot of the member countries are falling short of their responsibilities and duties to that purpose.

Sorta like the UN, right?

RF 1
Red Flag 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 20:01   #5
Peteyboy
Asset
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 30
Sort of but the UN is more of talking to our enemies while NATO is all about protecting us and our little group of allies from them.
Peteyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2011, 01:22   #6
CW1287
Asset
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USAEUR
Posts: 18
The UN is a delegation of countries monitoring each other. They apply sanctions which are useless, because the UN has no way of backing up these "threats." Iraq, Iran, and North Korea (to name a few) are all countries who have been sanctioned and the sanctions have literally done nothing. Besides wagging fingers at people the UN has no real power, it was a great idea in theory but when you add the realities of life into the equation (not to mention political agendas), the UN is just a puppet.


My $.02

LT W
CW1287 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:18.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies