Old 10-03-2020, 12:00   #1
WarriorDiplomat
Quiet Professional
 
WarriorDiplomat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: C.S. Colorado
Posts: 2,021
AWG being disbanded?

https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-...warfare-group/

I am not sure if this was ever a good idea given I dont know any good commanders who actually tried to correct their units tactical issues. They always seemed like they were producing information information for commanders who didnt want to do the work themselves to know what is going on
__________________
“For the strength of the Pack is the Wolf, and the strength of the Wolf is the Pack.” –Rudyard Kipling, The Law of the Jungle, The Jungle Book.

Last edited by WarriorDiplomat; 10-03-2020 at 12:03.
WarriorDiplomat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2020, 13:25   #2
Flagg
Area Commander
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarriorDiplomat View Post
https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-...warfare-group/

I am not sure if this was ever a good idea given I dont know any good commanders who actually tried to correct their units tactical issues. They always seemed like they were producing information information for commanders who didnt want to do the work themselves to know what is going on
Rapid Equipping Force(REF) is gone as well.

An argument could be made they were both stop-gap & born to ultimately make themselves redundant.

Pete Newell’s(REF plankowner) IED slide is still the most impactful PowerPoint slide I’ve ever seen covering IED attacks and casualties overlaid with relative good/bad guy OODA loops.

It certainly looked like they saved a lot of lives.

But is problem curation, solution development, and rapid procurement so good now that it is actually true?


SOFWERX, AFWERX, DIUX, Hacking4Defense, etc have all been influenced or co-founded by folks from AWG/REF.

Further to that, the increasingly rare bi-partisan effort that created the Future of Defense Task Force 2020 report pushes hard for accelerating the kind of efforts AWG/REF were focused on.

I don’t know if chopping AWG/REF is a cost cutting initiative, a belief they were only good for CT support, or a belief that rapid institutional solution procurement makes them redundant.

What I do know is that the future fight between Clausewitz and Sun Tzu will probably be decided by which side better applies John Boyd prior to the fight.
Flagg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2020, 06:42   #3
JimP
Quiet Professional
 
JimP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: State of confusion
Posts: 1,525
I spent some time there in the early days. The original design concept espoused by GEN Cody when he was Vice was immediately neutered when he retired. It was more a rice bowl issue. Once Cody was gone and they didn't have a Godfather, the long-knives came out. They had some incredible talent, and weren't tied to many of the developmental rules hindering traditional orgs.

In my time there, we suffered monthly investigations - someone with stars coming in trying to shut it down. We'd have to go to the Pentagon weekly to brief the Army 3/5/7 on ops.

The only thing they found was on one particularly painful investigation with a total douche of a GO (can't recall assholes name) was that one NCO's date of her taking the PT test didn't match what was on the training calendar for that month. I shit you not!!

They still did some awesome things as they had the entire world as a JOA and there were some good programs running that few others could pull off. That's about all that can be said in this forum.

The death knell was when they were assigned to TRADOC....; they didn't know what to do with them and the Pentagon looks to have successfully killed what was originally envisioned as an incredible capability.
JimP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2020, 19:40   #4
doctom54
Quiet Professional
 
doctom54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 490
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flagg View Post

What I do know is that the future fight between Clausewitz and Sun Tzu will probably be decided by which side better applies John Boyd prior to the fight.
Best quote I have heard in a long time.
__________________
"For exercise I recommend vigorous walking... and carrying a gun. The gun’s weight will increase the level of exercise and the possession of a gun on a walk produces real confidence."
Thomas Jefferson
doctom54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2020, 09:31   #5
Intel NCO
Auxiliary
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: N/A
Posts: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimP View Post
I spent some time there in the early days. The original design concept espoused by GEN Cody when he was Vice was immediately neutered when he retired. It was more a rice bowl issue. Once Cody was gone and they didn't have a Godfather, the long-knives came out. They had some incredible talent, and weren't tied to many of the developmental rules hindering traditional orgs.

In my time there, we suffered monthly investigations - someone with stars coming in trying to shut it down. We'd have to go to the Pentagon weekly to brief the Army 3/5/7 on ops.

The only thing they found was on one particularly painful investigation with a total douche of a GO (can't recall assholes name) was that one NCO's date of her taking the PT test didn't match what was on the training calendar for that month. I shit you not!!

They still did some awesome things as they had the entire world as a JOA and there were some good programs running that few others could pull off. That's about all that can be said in this forum.

The death knell was when they were assigned to TRADOC....; they didn't know what to do with them and the Pentagon looks to have successfully killed what was originally envisioned as an incredible capability.

Lots of interesting points in here. I was trying to apply, but they said they weren't hiring which was odd to me, then this came out so it makes sense.

Going back to 2008 when Russia invaded Georgia, hybrid warfare has only increased. We're going to see a lot of continuous low level conflicts globally and Big Army seems to be focused on slicing that skillset out in favor of an envisioned WW3 that's highly improbable to occur at the expense of fighting the wars we're likely to continue fighting.
__________________
Very Respectfully,
Intel NCO
Intel NCO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2020, 15:48   #6
Ret10Echo
Quiet Professional
 
Ret10Echo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Occupied America....
Posts: 4,740
Seems like kicking the antiquated and slow procurement process in the teeth was a good idea.
__________________
"There are more instances of the abridgment of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations"

James Madison
Ret10Echo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:07.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies