Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > Special Forces Weapons > Weapons Discussion Area

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-08-2008, 10:37   #1
Slater
Asset
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 13
M4 carbine: US Air Force vs US Army

https://aais.ria.army.mil/aais/award...000/000000.pdf

Looking at the stipulations in the above contract, is the USAF configuration/accessory package significantly different from the Army style?
Slater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 11:58   #2
Ret10Echo
Quiet Professional
 
Ret10Echo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Occupied America....
Posts: 4,740
7. M4 Carbines in support of United States Air Force (USAF) Requirements will be provided without Carrying Handles. Back-Up Iron
Sights (BUIS), Part Number 12996812 along with a copy of the mounting instructions for use in the field will be provided as GFM. Colt
will mount the BUIS on the weapon prior to T&A in accordance with attachment 010 of the solicitation, entitled M4 Carbine Specification
Modification. The mounting instructions received with each BUIS shall be overpacked with each USAF weapon. In addition, one each M68
Optic, Part Number 12974278 and Technical Manual TM 9-1240-413-12&P (Basic plus change 1) will be provided as GFM and shall be
overpacked with each USAF weapon. The M68 Optic manual will fit in the box with the Optic.
__________________
"There are more instances of the abridgment of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations"

James Madison
Ret10Echo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 12:05   #3
Team Sergeant
Quiet Professional
 
Team Sergeant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 20,929
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slater View Post
https://aais.ria.army.mil/aais/award...000/000000.pdf

Looking at the stipulations in the above contract, is the USAF configuration/accessory package significantly different from the Army style?
Air Force models will only be capable of firing blank rounds and will require a eight digit passcode to unlock the trigger mechanism each and every time the trigger is pulled.
__________________
"The Spartans do not ask how many are the enemy, but where they are."
Team Sergeant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 00:52   #4
Maytime
Guerrilla
 
Maytime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 199
A small printer will be attached via rail system to print out a report after each pulling of said trigger, and a friendly reminder will notify you when the weapon is not on safe.
__________________
Trust your hang.
Maytime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 03:07   #5
brownapple
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maytime View Post
A small printer will be attached via rail system to print out a report after each pulling of said trigger, and a friendly reminder will notify you when the weapon is not on safe.

Forgot the red tags hanging from the barrel, the safety and taped over the magazine well and magazine lips, each marked "remove before firing".
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 03:53   #6
jwt5
Guerrilla
 
jwt5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 202
Those are a lot of attachments for weapons that will remain in the arms room...

Wait, does the AF even have those????

__________________
"All I ask from this life is that when I die, it's FOR something, not OF something."
jwt5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 06:17   #7
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,779
Actually, the AF personnel I have seen with M-4s tended to have a nasty mix of old Vietnam era through current issue parts, with XM-16 lowers and CQB-R uppers clapped together with an assortment of optics in a seeming haphazard manner.

This looks to me like they might be planning to buy some new rifles to replace those with.

Maybe they figured out where this war is taking place and reprioritized a little money.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 09:14   #8
Team Sergeant
Quiet Professional
 
Team Sergeant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 20,929
When I deployed to Desert Shield there was a company of AF types on the same C-5. While we were waiting in a hanger a AF female walked over to where I and CSM were sitting and asked if we were in Special Forces? We answered yes and she then asked if we could give her a quick class on the M-16. CSM "Joe D" laughed and looked at me and said "time to teach class". I started teaching a class and before 10 minutes was over the entire company, to include the female Maj was sitting there in M-16 class. Class went on for over two hours.

Many sitting there stated they had never fired a weapon. Class went on another hour. Before I was through I told them not to worry as we Army ground combatants were more than a match for the Iraqis and we would not allow the enemy to penetrate two hundred miles into our rear area.

The weapons were Vietnam era weapons, some only had four digit serial numbers! I've seen better weapons in third world countries.

TS
__________________
"The Spartans do not ask how many are the enemy, but where they are."
Team Sergeant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 09:50   #9
HOLLiS
Area Commander
 
HOLLiS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pacific NorthWet
Posts: 1,495
TS, Great story. I guess is points to a common said bias about the AF command, that unless it flys very fast, very high and cost a lot, they are not interested.

It was a good thing you were there to help them.
HOLLiS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 10:02   #10
Monsoon65
Guerrilla Chief
 
Monsoon65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Harrisburg PA
Posts: 864
Quote:
Originally Posted by Team Sergeant View Post
Air Force models will only be capable of firing blank rounds and will require a eight digit passcode to unlock the trigger mechanism each and every time the trigger is pulled.
Close, TS.

It's only a six digit passcode, and you have to have a CAC card reader installed on the weapon before you can use it. And an officer has to sign you off as being qualified.

When I was with the Third Herd, we had weapons that had the three prong flash suppressor on them. I held one by the lower, grasped the carry handle and could rock the upper back and forth about an inch either way. Real nice stuff!
__________________
So let me fill my children's hearts
With heroes tales and hope it starts
A fire in them so deeds are done
With no vain sighs for moments gone
Monsoon65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 10:08   #11
Pete
Quiet Professional
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 13,080
A thing to remember

HOLLiS,

from the late 70s through the 80s and the run up to the first Gulf War the Air Force ( except for the Aircraft pilots, CCT, PJs and Security troops ) were really "office/job" focused.

It really was a come as you are war and the Air Force was going to "Be there on the ground". The Air Force was really scrambling for individual combat equipment - as well as bunchs of other troops.

Any stateside factories making desert related gear for the military went into maximum overtime production. I think the MOPP gear plants were running three shifts.
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 10:22   #12
Slater
Asset
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 13
I was a USAF Ammo Troop from 1978-1998. The buzzword in the late 1970's/early 1980's was "management" and not so much "leadership". I went to the old PME I and II and that's what you mainly heard.

When I came in most, if not all, the NCO's were Vietnam veterans and we enjoyed listening to their stories (Hell, I was only 18). My first supervisor built bombs by the thousand for the "Arc Light" missions. For the youngsters here, "Arc Light" was B-52 strikes in direct support of the ground forces. Usually 3-plane cells of B-52D's (IIRC), each carrying 108 Mk 82's or M117's. They really impacted enemy morale.
Slater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 10:38   #13
HOLLiS
Area Commander
 
HOLLiS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pacific NorthWet
Posts: 1,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slater View Post
Usually 3-plane cells of B-52D's (IIRC), each carrying 108 Mk 82's or M117's. They really impacted enemy morale.
Not to mention one heck of a light show for friendlies.

Pete, thanks. One of my all time favorite fix wing is the A10 and to think the AF was going to junk it. There is a thread on that plane, the thinking is that it should probably be under Army and or USMC control rather than AF. Obviously easier said than done, with all the logistic that would have to done to make the switch. Being a grunt, those things with flix wings was always over my head (pun intended), as if they came from another world.
HOLLiS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2008, 18:33   #14
AngelsSix
Area Commander
 
AngelsSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 1,149
Don't even get me started..................
__________________
The question is never simply IF someone is lying, it's WHY. - Lie To Me

We must always fear the wicked. But there is another kind of evil that we must fear the most, and that is the indifference of good men - Boondock Saints

Iraq was never lost and Afghanistan was never quite the easy good war. Those in the media too often pile on and follow the polls rather than offer independent analysis. Campaign rhetoric and politics are one thing - the responsibility of governance is quite another.
- Victor Davis Hanson
AngelsSix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2008, 19:33   #15
Defender968
SF Candidate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 811
Quote:
Originally Posted by HOLLiS View Post
TS, Great story. I guess is points to a common said bias about the AF command, that unless it flys very fast, very high and cost a lot, they are not interested.

It was a good thing you were there to help them.
Ok so I feel like I should speak up for your little blue "sister" service, I say that tounge and cheek because I'm often the first one to call the Air Force gay in many of it’s practices.

Hollis is correct, if it's not sexy and can't fly at 30k+ feet, real fast the AF brass for the most part don't care, partially because they are very slow to adapt to new situations, but mainly because 99% of our "leaders" wear pajamas with a full length zipper and if it doesn't have something to do with flying they don't care. They know stick back world gets smaller, stick forward, world gets bigger, and for the most part that’s about it. I’ve personally heard a fighter jock O-6 type seriously consider attacking a bus full of civilians with one guy armed with a 9mm, during a hostage exercise on a CONUS base. On the job we say “you can’t make this shit up!”

I will say another contributing factor is the brass are still trying to figure out that there is no real rear battle area, which historically is what we were responsible for, now the front edge of the battle area may very well be the perimeter of the base my guys must defend, hell that's why my beloved Air Force are saluting in Iraq right now, sexy and tactical right!

The other thing I've got to say is 85% of the AF will never need, nor could use a weapon if they had too, basically they're sheep, I'm not talking about my TACP, CCT, PJ, and of course my Defender brethren, just the rank and file, your Mission support troops, Med Group folks, and others etc . Now knowing they won't and couldn't use a weapon even if they had too, the AF policy (and I'm not defending it) is that there are different arming classes, the lowest of which don't fire that often. I'm not going to go into the specifics on the net but my troops get much more trigger time, still not as much as they should but enough to keep them competent.

Lastly all Security Forces Squadrons have converted to M-4s, with the M68 optic, and all the goodies, and we know how to use them, not nearly as well as a quiet professional I will be the first one to admit, but much better than any of the other AF types and I would bet better than most non combat Army troops.

Just my .02
Defender968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:00.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies