Gov. Jerry Brown signs California gun restriction

[Sdiver]

In a continuation of the destruction of the United States Constitution, Gov. Moonbat signed several "jack booted" bills into law.

I truly feel sorry for the freedom loving people, now stuck behind "enemy lines" ...

Gov. Brown signs 6 stringent gun bills, vetoes others

SACRAMENTO -- Gov. Jerry Brown signed six stringent gun-control measures Friday that will require people to turn in high-capacity magazines and mandate background checks for ammunition sales, as California Democrats seek to strengthen gun laws that are already among the strictest in the nation.

Brown vetoed five other bills, including requirement to register homemade firearms and report lost or stolen weapons to authorities.

The Democratic governor's action is consistent with his mixed record on gun control. Some of the enacted bills duplicate provisions of a November ballot measure by Democratic Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom. Some of the vetoed measures also appear in Newsom's initiative.

"My goal in signing these bills is to enhance public safety by tightening our existing laws in a responsible and focused manner, while protecting the rights of law-abiding gun owners," Brown wrote in a one-sentence message to lawmakers.

Gun control measures have long been popular with the Democratic lawmakers who control the California Senate and Assembly. But they stepped up their push this year following the December shooting in San Bernardino by a couple who pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group.

The bills angered Republicans and gun-rights advocates who say Democrats are trampling on 2nd Amendment rights, creating new restrictions that won't cut off the flow of guns to people intent on using them for nefarious purposes.

"On the eve of Independence Day, independence and freedom and liberty in California has been chopped down at the knees and kicked between the legs," Sam Paredes, executive director of the advocacy group Gun Owners of California.

Lawsuits challenging the new laws are likely once they take effect next year, Paredes said.

Brown's action will require people who own magazines that hold more than 10 rounds to give them up. It extends a 1999 law that made it illegal to buy a high-capacity magazine or to bring one into the state but allowed people who already owned them to keep them.

In another attempt to slow reloading, the governor signed a bill outlawing new weapons that have a device known as a bullet button. Gun makers developed bullet buttons to get around a California's assault weapons ban, which prohibited new rifles with magazines that can be detached without the aid of tools. A bullet buttons allows a shooter to quickly dislodge the magazine using the tip of a bullet or other small tool.

People will be allowed to keep weapons they already own with bullet buttons, which are often referred to as "California compliant."

Brown also endorsed a bill making another attempt at regulating ammunition sales after a law passed in 2009 was struck down by a Fresno County judge who said it was too vague. The new bill will require ammo sellers to be licensed and buyers to undergo background checks. Transactions will be recorded.

He also opted to require a background check before a gun can be loaned to someone who isn't a family member.

"Strong gun laws work... What we're doing in California is a better job of keeping guns out of dangerous hands," said Amanda Wilcox, a spokeswoman for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, whose daughter was killed by a shooter using a high-capacity magazine.

The governor vetoed a measure that would have expanded a six-month-old program that allows courts to temporarily restrict gun ownership rights for people suspected of being dangerous.

He also decided against restricting all firearm purchases to one per month, a limitation that currently applies only to handguns

One bill he vetoed would have asked voters to strengthen penalties for stealing a gun, because he said voters will already be deciding it through Newsom's initiative. Newsom's ballot measure also will ask voters to require reporting of lost and stolen firearms - an idea Brown rejected Friday and has rejected at least twice before.

"I continue to believe that responsible people report the loss or theft of a firearm and irresponsible people do not; it is not likely that this bill would change that," he wrote in a veto message.

Newsom's initiative has put a spotlight on the lieutenant governor as he campaigns for governor in the 2018 election. He's been at loggerheads with Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de Leon, a Los Angeles Democrat, who tried unsuccessfully to convince Newsom to drop the ballot measures in favor of legislative action.

Brown's vetoes protected Newsom's initiative from becoming moot.

"The governor took swift action today and voters will have a chance to go even further in November, if they choose, with the lieutenant governor's initiative," said Evan Westrup, a spokesman for Brown.

http://abc7.com/news/gov-brown-signs...thers/1410013/

[Hand]

"My goal in signing these bills is to enhance public safety by tightening our existing laws in a responsible and focused manner, while protecting the rights of law-abiding gun owners,"

Bull.
Shit.

I didn't see anything about increasing penalties for people caught with illegally obtained firearms in their possession, nor for people who are prohibited by previous criminal convictions and are caught with firearms in their possession.

I didn't see anything about increasing penalties for people caught using a firearm during commission of a crime, or who use a firearm to commit murder or who use a firearm to commit a mass shooting.

I didn't see anything about increasing penalties for people who steal a firearm or who are caught with a stolen firearm in their possession.

No, the ONLY thing I see is increased restrictions on law abiding citizens who are protected by a 2nd Amendment right that Komunist Kalifornia refuses to acknowledge.

I send my condolences to the citizens of Komunist Kalifornia.


PS. FUCK Komunist Governor Jerry Brown square in the ass. I can only hope that when he passes from the earth, it will be a direct result of his retarded legislation.

[Team Sergeant]

The Socialist ruling elite demands that only they and their own SS Troops have weapons, all others can eat shitte.


Now if I were a gun or ammo manufacturer I would not allow another round or gun to be sent to Communist Kalif.

[Paslode]

I wonder if Richard will return to Texas?

[Razor]

The beauty of a law like this is that it will fail to make a substantial dent in actual criminal use of firearms, which obviously points to the fact that those out of control border states are to blame for all the gun-related crime in CA. This obviously means that those border states must enact unconstitutional gun laws as well to keep CA safe. Then, those states have borders too, so...

[Box]

...It's twelve o'clock, America - another day closer to victory.

[The Reaper]

Good time to buy PVC pipe manufacturer stocks.

TR

[GratefulCitizen]

There's a market for those weapons here in Free America (Arizona).
Sell 'em to us while you can!

(Better yet, just move...)

[Bracholi]

Originally Posted by Hand

I didn't see anything about increasing penalties for people caught with illegally obtained firearms in their possession, nor for people who are prohibited by previous criminal convictions and are caught with firearms in their possession.
.

Increased penalties for violent offenses and a justice system which actually serves to reform them would solve a lot of problems overnight. On the flip side, I have personally met reformed criminals whom don't deserve to permanently have their constitutional rights rescinded [by the way, honest question; From where in the constitution does the government gain it's rights and power to disenfranchise a felon of their constitutionally protected rights?] Isn't there some age old wisdom [might even be Biblical] about how we treat the least of us reflecting in how someone [the Almighty] will treat us? Thinking about this from a pure logical standpoint... If we were to actually start only releasing those whom were actually rehabilitated enough to be considered US Citizens again rather than a sub-class of individuals considered too dangerous to have their full rights reinstated... would those same folks not have the most enemies from their past to actually necessitate responsible gun ownership? Just my 2 cents.

Sorry I'm more of a solutions person. I can't hate our evil overlords without having to hate half of the country whom seem to keep electing them. I'll leave the hatred to the other side and attempt to educate with information and education about the varying degrees of rationalization and the different priorities which while we all ultimately share to some degree (sanctity of life, fair treatment, justice, integrity) which allow so many rational beings to arrive at such vehement odds with one another.

[mojaveman]

(Better yet, just move...)

Sounds good to me. I'm think I'm going to start looking for a job in the Phoenix area.

Just today I was at Bass Pro Shops talking to one of the managers in the firearms department who is also a Vietnam Veteran and he basically told me that they will stop selling ammo if the law goes through.