Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > Kit Tips > Professional Gear

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-22-2005, 10:42   #1
Roguish Lawyer
Consigliere
 
Roguish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland (at last)
Posts: 8,767
Anti-Shark Device

http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/02/21/s...ark/index.html

Divers embrace anti-shark device
From CNN's Phil O'Sullivan
Monday, February 21, 2005 Posted: 10:48 AM EST (1548 GMT)

ADELAIDE, Australia (CNN) -- An Australian company has developed technology that intends to protect divers and surfers from being attacked by sharks while they are in the water.

Great white sharks are attracted to the warm ocean currents along Australia's southern coastline and are a constant concern for divers who work in the sea.

The coastline supports colonies of fish and seals, and divers who hunt for scallops and abalone can spend up to 10 hours a day in the water.

Increasing numbers of divers are using a protective electronic device, called Shark Shield, while they work.

When a shark comes in to attack, it automatically closes its eyes as a way of protecting them. With no sight, it detects movement with a tiny sensor in its nose, which picks up the electrical current of its prey.

The Shark Shield takes advantage of this by emitting a much stronger pulse of electricity. The battery-operated device is switched on when the diver or surfer enters the water and the electrical current is generated continuously.

The current causes intense discomfort to the shark and, as a result, they leave the area.

The inventors of the technology say it does not affect any other marine life and has no known harmful effects on the shark or the wearer.

Paul Lunn, founder of SeaChange, the company that has developed the Shark Shield, said the device worked by attacking a shark's nervous system, and it worked on sharks with the strongest of charges.

"It puts it (the shark) into a spasm, it cannot breathe, it cannot survive in this particular field. We call it hitting the wall. It comes in and hits this barrier and then it goes."

Lunn said the device puts a controlled electronic field into the water, which dissipates quickly, so there is no permanent damage to the shark.

"The wonderful thing about our technology is that when they get out of that zone, there is no long lasting damage to the shark whatsoever," he said.

The Shark Shield can repel a shark from between five and eight meters (16-26 feet), he said.

Like so much technology that eventually makes it on to the marketplace, the Shark Shield isn't exactly new.

It was first developed more than a decade ago in South Africa, but has only recently been designed to commercial standards.

It is also proving popular with surfers, but because it weighs 400g (0.9lb), it does add some weight on to the board.

The main housing unit of the Shark Shield is worn on the thigh, and the antenna is worn on the ankle.

"It's something which takes a while to be accepted, it's like any new technology, people are not too sure," surfer Wayne Sutton told CNN.

Meanwhile, the device is also being attached to fishing nets to prevent sharks stealing fishermen's catch.
Roguish Lawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 11:29   #2
Pete
Quiet Professional
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 13,080
Anti-Shark Aid

Slow swim buddy works fine for me.

Of course that's a one time use item that's expensive to replace.

Bad news is when your buddy gives you the "You're SOL, HIOYA" hand signal.

Pete

All kidding aside I did see the demo on TV. It looked like it worked fairly well. The wire running down to the attenna at the fin didn't look like it would be that hard to get comfortable with. The sharks did jump back real quick.

Last edited by Pete; 02-22-2005 at 12:34. Reason: Adding some stuff
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2005, 21:19   #3
Air.177
Quiet Professional
 
Air.177's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central TX
Posts: 1,390
You know, Glocks work underwater. How's that for shark repellant?
Air.177 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2005, 23:04   #4
Bravo1-3
Guerrilla Chief
 
Bravo1-3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver (Not BC), Washington (Not DC)
Posts: 505
During the PADI Basic course, the instructor gets asked about sharks. His reply "If the shark is smaller than you, don't worry. If it's bigger than you, stab your buddy."
__________________
"How can a pacifist, tolerant anti-violence, anti-hunting, anti Second Amendment, anti-self-defense group turn to violence against a party that is pro- all of that?" - The Reaper, 11Oct04 14:42hrs
Bravo1-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 00:42   #5
Sdiver
Area Commander
 
Sdiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Black Hills of SD
Posts: 5,917
I don't know how to respond ????

A Lawyer, posting something about an anti-shark device.....

Something seems fishy to me.
__________________
Non Sibi Sed Suis
_____________________________________________
It's Good To Be Da King !!!! Just ask NDD !!!!
Sdiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 05:41   #6
lrd
Area Commander
 
lrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 1,012
ECM.

Why does it affect the shark and not the swimmer?
lrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 06:11   #7
Jack Moroney (RIP)
Quiet Professional
 
Jack Moroney (RIP)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vermont
Posts: 3,093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete
Slow swim buddy works fine for me.

.
That was one of the uses for LTs on A-Teams when we had them as XOs. That, and of course: turbulence tester, generator carrier and cranker, SADM carrier, ahkio puller. All in the interest of cross-training of course.

Jack Moroney
__________________
Wenn einer von uns fallen sollt, der Andere steht für zwei.
Jack Moroney (RIP) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 08:55   #8
Stargazer
Guerrilla
 
Stargazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 471
Quote:
Why does it affect the shark and not the swimmer?
See question/answer 12.

http://www.sharkshield.com/faq.php#faq012
Stargazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 11:07   #9
lrd
Area Commander
 
lrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 1,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stargazer
Thanks, Stargazer.
lrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 17:01   #10
Roguish Lawyer
Consigliere
 
Roguish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland (at last)
Posts: 8,767
Hijack terminated. Here's the new thread with the split-off posts:

http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/...ead.php?t=5840
Roguish Lawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2005, 15:07   #11
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,780
Tort reform.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 00:26.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies