Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > Kit Tips > Professional Gear

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-23-2009, 02:19   #61
Grand58742
Asset
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 8
Just for the sake of curiosity, how much would it cost per soldier to outfit the Army with a new camouflage pattern? Not just SOF units, but the "big Army" as a whole. I figure someone out here has a ball park figure. I saw the RFI cost when I went through ILO training a couple of years ago, but didn't pay much attention as I signed my life away.

New uniforms (four?), basic RFI issue: load carrying system, field gear like rucks, sleeping systems, OTV covers, helmet covers, etcetera.

Just being curious. Google didn't come up with anything that I could find.
Grand58742 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 15:22   #62
Eagle5US
Quiet Professional
 
Eagle5US's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tampa
Posts: 2,496
picked up A-Stan RFI yesterday...

Deploying with a non-SOF, ABN BCT
Everything is ACU.
When I asked about multi-cam stuff being issued...the contractor dude laughed and said we would probably be in Iran before multi-cam was issued out

Eagle
__________________
Primum non Nocere
"I have hung out in dangerous places a lot over the years, from combat zones to biker bars, and it is the weak, the unaware, or those looking for it, that usually find trouble.

Ain't no one getting out of this world alive. All you can do is try to have some choice in the way you go. Prepare yourself (and your affairs), and when your number is up, die on your feet fighting rather than on your knees. And make the SOBs pay dearly."
The Reaper-3 Sep 04
Eagle5US is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 18:22   #63
Smokin Joe
Area Commander
 
Smokin Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagle5US View Post
Deploying with a non-SOF, ABN BCT
Everything is ACU.
When I asked about multi-cam stuff being issued...the contractor dude laughed and said we would probably be in Iran before multi-cam was issued out

Eagle
Good luck and stay safe Doc!
__________________
"This is the law: The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck, "The Law"
Smokin Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 19:39   #64
Capt_G
Asset
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tidewater
Posts: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grand58742 View Post
Just for the sake of curiosity, how much would it cost per soldier to outfit the Army with a new camouflage pattern? Not just SOF units, but the "big Army" as a whole. I figure someone out here has a ball park figure. I saw the RFI cost when I went through ILO training a couple of years ago, but didn't pay much attention as I signed my life away.

New uniforms (four?), basic RFI issue: load carrying system, field gear like rucks, sleeping systems, OTV covers, helmet covers, etcetera.

Just being curious. Google didn't come up with anything that I could find.
estimates for total force is in excess of $5 Billion
Capt_G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 19:56   #65
Tatonka316
Gold Star Father
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Littleton, Colorado
Posts: 388
Well done, Utah Bob! I needed that laugh!!!
Tatonka316 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 21:17   #66
Peregrino
Quiet Professional
 
Peregrino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Occupied Pineland
Posts: 4,701
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagle5US View Post
Deploying with a non-SOF, ABN BCT
Everything is ACU.
When I asked about multi-cam stuff being issued...the contractor dude laughed and said we would probably be in Iran before multi-cam was issued out

Eagle
Your contractor contact's comment might not be as humerous as he thinks if the current foreign policy team keeps "winning friends and influencing enemies". We could be there as quickly as the next election cycle.
__________________
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.

~ Marcus Tullius Cicero (42B.C)
Peregrino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 21:30   #67
Richard
Quiet Professional
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 15,370
Quote:
When I asked about multi-cam stuff being issued...the contractor dude laughed and said we would probably be in Iran before multi-cam was issued out.
Maybe going with burqas or a mullah's garb might be a better option then.

Richard's $.02
__________________
“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)… There are just some kind of men who – who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.” - To Kill A Mockingbird (Atticus Finch)

“Almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.” - Robert Heinlein
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 00:37   #68
JoJoTheMonk
Asset
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 1
Check out the new Army Times, it talks about how Congress told Big Army to pick a new uniform camo by September. Looks like they are looking into Multicam since SOF has been using it for some time. Whether or not they will actually pick Crye's Multicam unlike last time or they might do a variation of the camo.
JoJoTheMonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 00:42   #69
Surgicalcric
Quiet Professional
 
Surgicalcric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wherever my ruck finds itself
Posts: 2,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoJoTheMonk View Post
Check out the new Army Times...
You need to check out the email you received when you registered here and follow the instructions contained therein.

Oh, welcome to PS.com.

Crip
__________________
"It's better to die on your feet than live on your knees."

"Its not who I am underneath, but what I do that defines me" -Batman

"There are no obstacles, only opportunities for excellence."- NousDefionsDoc
Surgicalcric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2009, 04:23   #70
LongWire
Quiet Professional
 
LongWire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N.E.WA
Posts: 1,137
New camo for Afghanistan?

Army Times~

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/0..._camo_081709w/

New camo for Afghanistan?
By Matthew Cox - Staff writer
Posted : Monday Aug 17, 2009 16:45:16 EDT
The Army is eyeing MultiCam, a camouflage pattern preferred by special operations forces, to replace the pixelated pattern on the combat uniforms soldiers wear in Afghanistan.

The hunt for a new camo design follows a growing groundswell of rank-and-file criticism that the current pattern on the Army Combat Uniform is ineffective in the rugged Afghan terrain — and elsewhere.

“The general consensus on the ACU pattern among many, many soldiers is that it is ineffective in breaking up a soldier’s outline in just about every environment except in urban areas and the local gravel pit,” Army Chief Warrant Officer 2 mark Ulsh wrote to Army Times. “As an aviator, I can tell you that from the air most other nations’ camouflage masks a soldier better than the ACU does.”

Similar complaints made their way to an influential member of Congress, who gave senior Army leaders a Sept. 30 deadline to present a plan that includes the budgetary and logistical details for outfitting roughly 40,000 soldiers serving in Afghanistan with a new camouflage pattern.

The directive to find an alternative to the Universal Camouflage Pattern comes just five years after it was introduced as the one-and-only camo design. It replaced both the Desert Camouflage Uniform and the woodland-patterned Battle Dress Uniform. Though the move to streamline soldiers’ clothing bags was generally applauded, many complained the result was a pattern that was not particularly effective in either desert or woodland surroundings.

Complaints about its ineffectiveness have grown as the Army has increased the number of soldiers deployed to Afghanistan.

Program Executive Office Soldier, the command responsible for developing uniforms and equipment, declined to be interviewed for this story.

“PEO Soldier and the Army continually strive to provide the best to our soldiers,” Army spokesman Maj. Jimmie Cummings said in an Aug. 6 written statement. “As such, a team led by Training and Doctrine Command is working an effort to determine if a change is required to our Universal Camouflage Pattern in support of soldiers operating in many different environments. It is premature to go into any detail on this effort at this time.”

Army officials, however, held a July 23 meeting with Crye Precision LLC, the company that developed MultiCam, to ask detailed questions about the availability of different MultiCam fabrics for making uniforms and soldier equipment, according to a source familiar with the issue who commented on the condition that he not be identified.

This meeting, however, was not the first time Army uniform officials saw the pattern that features seven shades of brown, tan and green. MultiCam, formerly known as “Scorpion,” was a top contender among a dozen experimental patterns when the Army began looking for a new camouflage design in early 2002 to replace the DCU and BDU.

But the Army passed on MultiCam in favor of a new pattern that PEO Soldier created with a digitized version of another contender, the “urban track” pattern. The Army modified that pattern by stripping out the highly visible black shade. The ACU’s mix of green, tan and gray would later become known as the Universal Camouflage Pattern.

In going with a digitized UCP, the Army followed the lead of the Marine Corps, which began fielding its new digitized pattern in 2002. The Army also considered the woodland and desert versions of the popular Marine digital uniform, but rejected the design in favor of a single, multiuse pattern.

INVESTIGATING COMPLAINTS
Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., launched the congressional camouflage mandate in mid-June, saying that he had heard complaints from “a dozen” Army noncommissioned officers that that ACU’s pattern is ineffective in Afghanistan.

Since then, dozens of soldiers have responded to an Army Times query seeking opinions of the Army’s current camouflage.

“The Army needs a new uniform, period. Not just for Afghanistan,” wrote 2nd Lt. Chris Cahak, who is serving in Iraq at Forward Operating Base Future. “The ACU uses ‘universal camouflage,’ meaning it doesn’t blend into anything. The article [‘Get new camo, Congress says,’ June 29] says the ACU works fine in Iraq, but that is a myth. There is no natural setting that I have seen anywhere that blends in with the ACU.”

Sgt. Ricky Hill of Fort Carson, Colo., agreed with Cahak that soldiers in Afghanistan aren’t the only ones who need a new camouflage pattern.

“The ACU pattern is horrible,” Hill wrote. “Whatever happened to the MultiCam pattern that was tested a few years ago? I don’t know who came up with this current ACU pattern, but it has failed miserably.”

Several soldiers who have written to Army Times defended the ACU pattern’s performance.

Sgt. 1st Class Ryan Hendricks wrote that the ACU’s performance was “spot on” when he was a platoon sergeant serving in Khost, Afghanistan.

“The ACUs we wore were perfect for the job of mountain warfare and in the towns and roads that we patrolled,” he wrote. “A lot of the time, I would have to use optics to find my squads patrolling in the distance.”

Capt. Joe Corsentino offered a different view.

“Being an aviator, I get a top-down view of the battlefield, and I can tell you 100 percent that the ACU stands out like a sore thumb in the Afghan environment,” he wrote.

many Army special operations units such as Delta Force, the 75th Ranger Regiment and some Special Forces teams apparently feel the UCP is not the best pattern in either war zone as they are wearing the MultiCam pattern in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

Army Special Operations Command has tested MultiCam in different environments worldwide, including Iraq and Afghanistan, and found that it outperformed the ACU’s pattern, a senior Army officer with Special Forces told Army Times. The officer added that MultiCam is being considered as the future pattern of Army SOF.

Corsentino said in his letter that he also prefers MultiCam.

“I have worked with units who wore the MultiCam uniforms, and they were camouflaged much more effectively than soldiers wearing the ACU,” he wrote.

Soldiers participating in a Future Force Warrior Assessment in 2006 had the same opinion of MultiCam.

The nine-man squad that participated in the Air Assault Expeditionary Force experiment in fall 2006 at Fort Benning, Ga., wore MultiCam-patterned, Future Force Warrior uniforms in addition to a number of high-tech gadgets and gear. The force-on-force exercise was designed to assess how the experimental soldier kit would affect the performance of soldiers going against soldiers with the current-issue kit.

One of the questions in the post-exercise survey read, “Was the camouflage pattern of the FFW uniform not as good, about the same or better than the camo pattern on the ACU?”

All nine soldiers indicated that the MultiCam pattern was better than the ACU’s pattern, according to the July 2007 report from the Army Research Laboratory’s “Future Force Warrior: Insights from Air Assault Expeditionary Force Assessment.”

Here are the soldiers’ comments as they appeared in the report:

• “It blends better in the woods than the ACU.”

• “Got 5 feet from the OpFor and they didn’t see us until after we fired. With the ACUs, you’ll be seen a mile away.”

• “Numerous amount of times, we snuck within 10 feet of the enemies.”

• “I even lost my own guys a couple of times it worked so well.”

• “I’m telling you this uniform is way better in the field than ACUs. In fact, ACUs are nothing but a garrison uniform.”

• “It’s obvious; just look at it.”

• “The camouflage pattern is 50x better than the ACU uniform. When stationary or on the move it is hard to pick out in the tree line. The squads behind ours had trouble following us because they would lose sight of us so easily. We always knew where they were.”

• “We were having trouble seeing our guys when we would stop in the wood line, whereas anyone wearing ACUs was easy to spot. It is a far superior camouflage pattern than the ACU.”
__________________
"Most of us here can attest that we never took the easy way. Easy just is............easy. Life is a work in progress, and most of the time its a struggle." ~ Me

"Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." -Henry Louis Mencken (1880-1956)

"A Government that is losing to an insurgency is not being outfought, it is being out governed." Bernard B. Fall
LongWire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2009, 04:24   #71
LongWire
Quiet Professional
 
LongWire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N.E.WA
Posts: 1,137
New camo for Afghanistan?-cont

Crye Precision began working on camouflage in 2002, two years after Caleb Crye formed the company. The company had already been working with the Army to develop new soldier equipment. Then Crye became interested in designing a camouflage pattern that would allow soldiers to operate in multiple environments.

“We saw guys being deployed to a war in Afghanistan with a combination of camouflage patterns that just wasn’t effective,” Crye said, describing how soldiers at the time wore DCUs with woodland pattern body armor vests.

No one in the small company, including Crye, had military backgrounds, said Crye, who has a fine arts degree. The Crye team traveled extensively, taking pictures of terrain features, rocks and vegetation.

“We didn’t look at camouflage so much; we looked at a lot of environments, and we tried to find a lot of things that were common in as many environments as possible,” he told Army Times.

“If you start looking at pictures of rocks all day, there are just these shapes that show up.”

They also paid attention to the way animals use camouflage.

“We knew it was going to be half science, half trial and error,” Crye said. “Before we settled on printing real fabric, we probably had about 12 patterns. The first ones were really different.”

Still, MultiCam alone may not be the answer, some soldiers say.

“The Army should have one desert pattern and one woodland pattern, at a minimum,” Sgt. Adam Houtkooper wrote in a letter to Army Times. “Afghanistan varies widely in the amount and type of vegetation, so no one uniform will work for the entire country. … The bottom line is that bad camouflage risks soldiers’ lives, and the decision to force every soldier to wear a pattern that is ineffective has reduced the effectiveness of our force.”
__________________
"Most of us here can attest that we never took the easy way. Easy just is............easy. Life is a work in progress, and most of the time its a struggle." ~ Me

"Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." -Henry Louis Mencken (1880-1956)

"A Government that is losing to an insurgency is not being outfought, it is being out governed." Bernard B. Fall
LongWire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2009, 08:00   #72
7624U
Quiet Professional
 
7624U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,461
Ive always liked how the night desert parka blends
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CLG912lg.jpg (67.2 KB, 294 views)
__________________
"Make sure your plan fits the terrain or you will be slurping mud puddles”

"Me"

Last edited by 7624U; 08-29-2009 at 08:09.
7624U is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2009, 06:56   #73
dac
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 133
In the news again, with some decent pictures and a pretty graph.

http://soldiersystems.net/2009/09/18...sense-part-ii/

The patterns are horrible, I can see every one of those people!
__________________
Oderint Dum Metuant.

Refreshments will be provided.
dac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2009, 10:04   #74
pjody187
Asset
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cincinnati, OH. USA
Posts: 56
Soldiers to test new camo in Afghanistan

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/0..._camo_091409w/
__________________
"I will persist until I succeed. Always will I take another step. If that is of no avail I will take another, and yet another. In truth one step at a time is not to difficult. I know that small attempts , repeated, will complete any undertaking."

- Og Mandino
pjody187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2009, 17:31   #75
LongWire
Quiet Professional
 
LongWire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N.E.WA
Posts: 1,137
Knowing the army they will try and go with the UCP D pattern. That way they can retrofit everyone and save money to boot. The retrofit kit will include a cardboard cut out stencil and a rattle can of coyote brown.

Should be interesting to see what they come up with!!!!
__________________
"Most of us here can attest that we never took the easy way. Easy just is............easy. Life is a work in progress, and most of the time its a struggle." ~ Me

"Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." -Henry Louis Mencken (1880-1956)

"A Government that is losing to an insurgency is not being outfought, it is being out governed." Bernard B. Fall
LongWire is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:52.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies