Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > Kit Tips > Professional Gear

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-12-2004, 23:27   #1
Smokin Joe
Area Commander
 
Smokin Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,691
Digital Cameras

What type of Digital Camera do you use?

I'm looking to pick up a new Digital Camera I would like the type of quality that The Reaper and MilitaryMoron have displayed around here.

Any recommedations?
Smokin Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2004, 23:48   #2
militarymoron
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: email: militarymorons@gmail.com
Posts: 153
SJ, i have a sony mavica CD400 (4 megapixels). the replacement model is the CD500 (5 megs) which is cheaper than my older model:

http://www.steves-digicams.com/2003_reviews/cd500.html

it's about the size of a fullsize 35mm SLR, but quite light. the reason i chose the mavica is the mini-CD storage, as opposed to a flash card or microdrive. it's not as compact, but i can live with it, and i've had great use out of this camera over the past two years. it's got a zeiss lens, with exceptional clarity. but as you know, the ultimate quality of the photo depends on the photographer, with lighting being the most important factor IMHO.

this same question was asked by mad dog on tactical forums, and i went over the advantages and disadvantages of the mini-CD storage. here's the link to the thread:
http://64.177.53.248/ubb/Forum74/HTML/000288.html

jeff (USMC03) from the LF, TF, AW and arf.com forums bought a CD500 on my recommendation and has been very happy with it - he's been posting gun porn pics all over. shoot him an email at Crpntr74@cs.com for a 2nd opinion.

what will work for you depends on your requirements. if you're looking for a small, compact camera, then mini-CD media is not going to be your choice.
HTH,
cheers,
MM
militarymoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2004, 08:04   #3
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,779
I needed a small, compact model and was on a budget, so I wound up with a 2MP Fuji 2600.

Not a bad camera of the point and shoot variety.

If I was doing this professionally, I would go with one of the ones mm mentioned.

HTH.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2004, 08:30   #4
Sacamuelas
JAWBREAKER
 
Sacamuelas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gulf coast
Posts: 1,905
Quote:
Originally posted by The Reaper
I ...was on a budget.
HTH.
TR

LOL You on a budget??? I can't help but laugh at that one Sir. Judging from all the personally owned gun, knife, and equipment pictures you have graced us with online, I would have to say using the term budget just doesn't seem to do you justice. I think you should refer to your situation as more of an "unlimited personal spending stipend". You must have decided that you didn't want a fancy camera...

Joe-
For net and home useage, most of the 4-5 megapixel cameras will be more than you should need. That being said, I would focus on the actual lens equipped on the models you are looking at for purchase.

Completely disregard the "digital" zoom number... the actual lens zoom is the only one that is important.

I have seen Sony, HP, and Olympus digital cameras all function for what you want. 4-5 Mg pixel and then cost,size,lens and accessories (like a docking station) are what I would look for. Good luck
__________________
"If you live here you better speak the language. This is supposed to be a melting pot not a frigging stew" - Jack Moroney

Last edited by Sacamuelas; 03-13-2004 at 08:46.
Sacamuelas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2004, 11:01   #5
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,779
Quote:
Originally posted by Sacamuelas
LOL You on a budget??? I can't help but laugh at that one Sir. Judging from all the personally owned gun, knife, and equipment pictures you have graced us with online, I would have to say using the term budget just doesn't seem to do you justice. I think you should refer to your situation as more of an "unlimited personal spending stipend". You must have decided that you didn't want a fancy camera...
Doc (I use that term loosely):

I am in my mid-40s, and was single until I was in my mid-30s. I spent my money back then on gear, not ex-wife support payments. Most of my hardware is pre-ban/marriage.

I have several high end 35mm Nikon SLRs that I used to use professionally, and a couple of point and shoot 35mms for handy family use. I decided to try digital without wasting a lot of money, and got the equivalent of a point and shoot. The extra $200 for a 3-4 MP camera would have been would have been the equivalent of 150 rounds of .50 BMG or 1000 rounds of 5.56mm ammo. Priorities.

My next digicam will be higher end, but still not the equivalent of an SLR. Too inconvenient and bulky, not likely to be handy for anything but studio shooting. I plan to stick with the point and shoots.

I do a lot of research before I make an investment in gear, and hopefully choose right. If I buy every two or three years, I expect that I can buy a camera with twice the features for roughly the same price.

"unlimited personal spending stipend"? Hardly. I am a soldier with a family to support. When it comes to gear, I research, shop around, save, and buy the best that I can afford that meets my needs. My life can depend on it.

BTW, I really appreciate mm, eggroll and all of the other guys who runs T&E sites and report on their experiences. It saves me a lot of time and money if I can eliminate a number of the candidates right off the bat. Good show, guys!

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2004, 11:02   #6
Smokin Joe
Area Commander
 
Smokin Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,691
Here is what I have been using:

Its a fujifilm finepix 3.2 megapixels, produces images 2048x1536, w/ a 3.2 optical zoom. I have found that the camera doesn't collect enough light for up close shots (as evidence of the photos I have posted here). Additionally it gets pretty grainy when I print photos over 5x7.

Thanks for the info Gentlemen. Cool Camera MM, but its a little out of my price range, I'm looking more around the 200-300 range.

TR how do you produce such great photos with a 2.0 megapixel camera?
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg rev_a303_lg.jpeg (4.8 KB, 133 views)
Smokin Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2004, 11:07   #7
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,779
Experience, shooting at the max resolution setting, filling up the frame to minimize cropping, and lighting.

I reduce the pics at least 50% to fit them in the size limit here.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2004, 16:52   #8
militarymoron
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: email: militarymorons@gmail.com
Posts: 153
even though my camera will take up to 4 mp's, i'm usually shooting at the 2nd to lowest resolution (1280x960) for web photos. sometimes i'll shoot at 1600 for printed stuff, but i've actually never had to use it at the max resolution of 2272. in fact, i did the photography for the 4 ft tall banners for the buffertech booth at the SHOT show, and all those enlargements were made from 1600 resolution pics.
if most of your applications are for snapping pics for the web and printing no larger than 5x7, you don't really need a hi-res digital camera. but one thing you may not get with a compact camera is the variety of settings, or light metering options, which can be important.
like others have pointed out here, the lens is important, and even more so is the lighting. get more light on your subject and your pics won't come out so grainy. it's always better to shoot with a bit more light than not enough. i always adjust my photos in adobe photoshop anyways. but you'll learn from experience, as TR pointed out. learning is something that will never stop. i'm only in the infant stages of product photography, and haven't even gotten into the realm of the 'professionals'. however, what i've found out is that you don't always need all that expensive equipment to take decent photos - a lot can be done on a shoestring budget and a little ingenuity. i don't have a studio - all my pics are taken in the bedroom, living room or outdoors. you'd laugh at some of the techniques i use. instead of spending $500 on a hotbox (the studio standard lighting diffuser for product photography), i made my own out of a paper grocery bag, tape, and tracing paper. but i did find it necessary to invest about $150 in daylight-balanced studio fluorescent lights, otherwise i'd be a slave to dayllight.
another cheap, simple tip that goes a long way to improving clarity is to use a tripod as much as possible. all my product photography is done with a tripod. if light levels are a bit low, i set the auto timer and let it take the pic to minimize shake. you'll find that the quality of your pics can improve substantially.

sure, i wish my camera were more compact, but i was used to carrying around a fullsize nikon 35mm SLR anyways (which was heavier). for snapshots, i had a olympus stylus. but those two cameras have been untouched ever since i went digital. i ain't going back.

TR - thanks for the kind words.
cheers,
MM
militarymoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2004, 17:12   #9
Sacamuelas
JAWBREAKER
 
Sacamuelas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gulf coast
Posts: 1,905
Good point.. If accurate color representation is needed then color corrected bulbs are definitely beneficial as MM stated.

They can be found much cheaper than they used to be. Check your Lowes/Home depot for availability. I used to have to purchase mine (large tube 48” fluorescents) for operatory lighting from specialty makers as color/shade selection is vitally important in my field. Now I can get them MUCH cheaper…

I think I saw regular 60-100 watt bulbs in a Walmart that are close to 96% corrected to sunlight.
Sacamuelas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2004, 17:23   #10
militarymoron
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: email: militarymorons@gmail.com
Posts: 153
let me clarify on the lighting - the $150 was for a lighting kit, which included two daylight bulbs (the bulbs are $15 each), stands, and reflectors. you can buy the bulbs alone and use them in a desktop lamp at a pinch.
these are the bulbs:
http://store.yahoo.com/greenbatterie...omfluorbu.html
this is the kit:
http://store.yahoo.com/greenbatterie...tabstudtw.html

my very first product photography gig paid for the entire kit.
here are some examples and what i used for lighting for each of them (username and password are both 'mm' to view pics):

desklamp and inova flashlight for 2nd light source
outdoor lighting
daylight balanced studio light kit
daylight from a window, a desklamp and a flashlight
hope that helps give you some ideas.
cheers,
MM

Last edited by militarymoron; 03-13-2004 at 17:33.
militarymoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2004, 19:18   #11
Smokin Joe
Area Commander
 
Smokin Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,691
It does thanks MM.

I have zero training or experience with photography so I will defiently use any advice. I think I just need to play around setup shots, and take lots of shots.

Thanks again for the advice all I will not be buying a new camera yet. I will instead try and become a better photographer with what I have.
Smokin Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2004, 19:58   #12
militarymoron
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: email: militarymorons@gmail.com
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally posted by Smokin Joe
Thanks again for the advice all I will not be buying a new camera yet. I will instead try and become a better photographer with what I have.
excellent decision!
you could post some pics here or email them and i (or anyone else) could give you our humble .02 and critique them for photography technique, and provide any tips that we think might help, if needed. i've done that before for friends and find that the most common difficulty that most people have is with lighting.
cheers,
MM
militarymoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2004, 21:54   #13
Smokin Joe
Area Commander
 
Smokin Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,691
Thank you MM for the advice and offer I will defiently take you up on it.

I'm uploading some pics right now I just took of my new Aimpoint and I will post them in the Aimpoint v Eotech thread I started in the weapons forum.
Smokin Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2004, 13:02   #14
ktek01
Suffering from SF TDY Envy
 
ktek01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: null
Posts: 228
I use a Sony DSC-P51 2.0 MP I think I paid about $300 for it 2 or 3 years ago, cameras in that range can be had for under $200 now. 3.2 is probably more than most of us will ever need, unless you want to print lots of 8X10 or larger. One thing I would want though is more optical zoom, the digital just enlarges the pixels which will make it very grainy the more you blow it up. I like the memory sticks on the Sony, on the max setting a 128 stick will hold 133 pictures (with a 2.0 MP camera) on 640X480 it will hold over 700. One program I like a lot is Roxio Photo Suite 5. Only $29 and it lets you upload from the camera, and all the photos on your PCs hardrive, edit, print, archive, etc. I like the CD burner options, you can put albums on a CD that you can play on a CD-R capable DVD player and watch them on your TV, also can add music to them. They have a website it can upload them to so family and friends can view the pictures (password protected) and even order prints from if they like. I took pictures at my sisters wedding last year and sent everyone the CDs, they were a big hit.

Last edited by ktek01; 03-14-2004 at 13:20.
ktek01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2004, 14:14   #15
lrd
Area Commander
 
lrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 1,012
Does anyone (besides me) have problems keeping the battery charged on their digital camera?
lrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Digital Cameras NousDefionsDoc Professional Gear 107 01-22-2010 11:44



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:21.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies