03-24-2004, 20:01
|
#16
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DanUCSB
It's a thorny-enough issue as it is. Toss in about a million people, all pointing fingers at someone else, and it's just a mess.
Was listening to someone on the radio the other day (Roger Hedgecock, I think), and he said something that made a lot of sense. Play the Devil's advocate and say, 'Okay, well, what if George Bush knew what was going to happen beforehand, and he had grounded all the flights that day. What would have happened then?" The answer, of course, is that the same people that are standing on their soapboxes today and wailing about how bad the administration is, would have been up in arms wailing about how he shut down the nation for a day, and nothing happened. It's a no-win proposition, with everyone running around playing 'cover your ass'.
--Dan, sick of conspiracy theorists
|
Heard a theory analogous to yours from some radio show
this morning.
Suppose Bush had taken some pre-emptive strike against
OBL prior to 9/11 and got him. Would that have stopped 9/11?
Doubt it. It was planned for years. Under those circumstances,
the group currently accusing Bush of no-action would probably
say Bush caused 9/11. They would argue his actions created
more terrorism, just like they are now with respect to Iraq.
On a side note, Martha was convicted for lying under oath, so what about Clarke?
|
|
|
03-25-2004, 02:13
|
#17
|
Guerrilla Chief
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 796
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Surgicalcric
Watching DICK Clarke dance the Potomac 2-step right now on FOX news.
|
Booyah! I saw a questioner hold up Clarke's book and a memo that he wrote while still serving. His book totally contradicts his position from while he was active. The questioner asked him which one was true. I didn't catch his response, but I'm sure that Clarke was squirming over that one.
|
Radar Rider is offline
|
|
03-25-2004, 09:05
|
#18
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 372
|
Clarke flip flops more than Kerry does it seems
This is a biased news source ( I found the link via GOPUSA.COM ) but very interesting facts within nonetheless regarding an interview Clarke gave PBS in 2002
Clarke's PBS Interview Indicates Bush Focused on Terrorism
__________________
“Its never too late to be what you might have been”.
|
DunbarFC is offline
|
|
03-25-2004, 12:53
|
#19
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: between the desert and the sea
Posts: 460
|
Based on the way I have felt for the past 2 years, I can only imagine what it feels like for the family of those that lost their lives in those towers and in the pentagon If nothing else comes out of the public hearing, at least they got to hear a public apology from a government official.
"We tried hard, but that doesn't matter because we failed."
|
pulque is offline
|
|
03-25-2004, 13:40
|
#20
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Williamston, SC
Posts: 2,018
|
Let's keep the apology in context and not take it as an admission of culpability. There are many things for which I am sorry but also of which I was powerless to prevent or control.
Failure to forsee future events or consequences happens everyday.
Last edited by QRQ 30; 03-25-2004 at 13:42.
|
QRQ 30 is offline
|
|
03-25-2004, 13:45
|
#21
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wherever my ruck finds itself
Posts: 2,972
|
After having watched a good portion of the public testamony I can honestly say I dont know that we could have prevented it based on testamony given. The attacks were several years in the making. Just getting OBL would not, IMHO, have stopped this from happening.
The simple fact is we were lax and they outwitted us, no more, no less.
__________________
"It's better to die on your feet than live on your knees."
"Its not who I am underneath, but what I do that defines me" -Batman
"There are no obstacles, only opportunities for excellence."- NousDefionsDoc
|
Surgicalcric is offline
|
|
03-25-2004, 17:48
|
#22
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: between the desert and the sea
Posts: 460
|
question
An apology is an expression of regret, not more, but not less.
For those who see a connection between 9/11 and Sadaam, would removing Sadaam earlier have prevented the situation?
No easy answers here.
"Trying to eliminate Saddam...would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible.... We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq.... there was no viable "exit strategy" we could see, violating another of our principles. Furthermore, we had been self-consciously trying to set a pattern for handling aggression in the post-Cold War world. Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the United Nations' mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the United States could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land."
-- George Herbert Walker Bush, from his memoir, A World Transformed
(1998)
|
pulque is offline
|
|
03-25-2004, 18:53
|
#23
|
Guest
|
|
|
|
03-26-2004, 02:07
|
#24
|
Guerrilla Chief
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 796
|
First, I believe there was a connection between Al Qaeda and Saddam. Second, removing Saddam earlier would not have affected 9-11. AQ's main base was in Afghanistan under the Taliban. Saddam was simply a kindred spirit who probably sent a little financial support and maybe some intel.
Speaking of Intel: The "community" was so downsized after the Cold War that we didn't have the capability we should have had to prevent 9-11. To put it another way, put a blindfold on a sharpshooter and see how well he fires.
|
Radar Rider is offline
|
|
03-26-2004, 06:04
|
#25
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Williamston, SC
Posts: 2,018
|
Actually Radar it was "The Peanut Man" who blinded our intelligence. "Gentlemen don't look in other's windows."
|
QRQ 30 is offline
|
|
03-26-2004, 07:00
|
#26
|
Guerrilla Chief
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 796
|
Quote:
Originally posted by QRQ 30
Actually Radar it was "The Peanut Man" who blinded our intelligence. "Gentlemen don't look in other's windows."
|
Sir, I imagine that the "Peanut Man" is Jimmy Carter? Even so, it is the democRATs that ruined our intelligence community.
|
Radar Rider is offline
|
|
03-26-2004, 09:29
|
#27
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 20,929
|
QRQ-30 is right.
Our ability to gather intell was destroyed by one moron and one moron only. He goes by the name of jimmy carter. A side note to this story is that people also (unnecessarily) lost their lives due to this decision. carter is an idiot that got a lot of people killed due to his stupidity.
I once heard a story that when he (carter) was briefed on the Iran raid the first question he asked was "Is anyone going to get hurt?"
Team Sergeant
__________________
"The Spartans do not ask how many are the enemy, but where they are."
|
Team Sergeant is offline
|
|
03-26-2004, 12:27
|
#28
|
Consigliere
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland (at last)
Posts: 8,767
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Team Sergeant
QRQ-30 is right.
Our ability to gather intell was destroyed by one moron and one moron only. He goes by the name of jimmy carter. A side note to this story is that people also (unnecessarily) lost their lives due to this decision. carter is an idiot that got a lot of people killed due to his stupidity.
I once heard a story that when he (carter) was briefed on the Iran raid the first question he asked was "Is anyone going to get hurt?"
Team Sergeant
|
I don't remember whether it was Beckwith or Haney, but one of those two books on the non-existent anti-terror unit with an airline name mentions that the author was impressed by Carter during the hostage rescue operation. I don't recall whether it was in being decisive about ordering it or in being cool to people after it failed.
I was very surprised to read anything positive about Carter from a member of the military.
|
Roguish Lawyer is offline
|
|
03-26-2004, 12:36
|
#29
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Williamston, SC
Posts: 2,018
|
RL: Nobody can be wrong ALL OF THE TIME!!
|
QRQ 30 is offline
|
|
03-26-2004, 12:40
|
#30
|
Consigliere
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland (at last)
Posts: 8,767
|
Quote:
Originally posted by QRQ 30
RL: Nobody can be wrong ALL OF THE TIME!!
|
You haven't met Jawbreaker yet, have you?
Just kidding. Even he is right about some things.
|
Roguish Lawyer is offline
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:59.
|
|
|