Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > Special Forces Weapons > Weapons Discussion Area

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-13-2004, 14:43   #1
NousDefionsDoc
Quiet Professional
 
NousDefionsDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 1,653
Honey! Bring the checkbook!

Cool! Reaper was probably all over this.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg m4rightmain.jpg (17.3 KB, 421 views)
__________________
Somewhere a True Believer is training to kill you. He is training with minimal food or water, in austere conditions, training day and night. The only thing clean on him is his weapon and he made his web gear. He doesn't worry about what workout to do - his ruck weighs what it weighs, his runs end when the enemy stops chasing him. This True Believer is not concerned about 'how hard it is;' he knows either he wins or dies. He doesn't go home at 17:00, he is home.
He knows only The Cause.

Still want to quit?
NousDefionsDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 15:07   #2
TRUST
Asset
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada / USA
Posts: 15
The official HKM4 System page for those [1 or 2 guys maybe] who haven't seen it:
http://www.hk-usa.com/pages/Military...rbines/m4.html

HK's SHOT Show gallery [updated regularly]:
http://www.hk-usa.com/corporate/medi...togallery.html

TRUST
TRUST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 18:14   #3
IrishEKU
Asset
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Behind the GLLD
Posts: 5
NDD,

I don't know how much you make it over to SOCNET anymore, but there is a running thread over there on this.

IMHO,

Forget HK and go with Barrett's 6.8mm SPC proposal. Save a whole lot of money by DXing the XM-8/26 and use the proposed "drop in" on the current lower frames. The only usable thing I can see HK bringing to the table is it's gas cylender tech, mesh that with Barrett's system and GTG.

BTW,

The picture above is HK's "drop in" with it's improvements untill the XM-8 is O-K'd. Why not try taking two birds with one 5.56mm stone?
__________________
I am not talking to myself, I'm arguing with the little bastages on my shoulders.

IrishEKU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 18:25   #4
Roguish Lawyer
Consigliere
 
Roguish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland (at last)
Posts: 8,765
Quote:
Originally posted by TRUST
The official HKM4 System page for those [1 or 2 guys maybe] who haven't seen it:
http://www.hk-usa.com/pages/Military...rbines/m4.html

HK's SHOT Show gallery [updated regularly]:
http://www.hk-usa.com/corporate/medi...togallery.html

TRUST
I liked this part:

Quote:
The elimination of the gas tube typical of the Stoner AR15/M16/M4 direct gas operating system means that the HKM4 will function normally even if the weapon is fired full of water without first being drained.
Says not available 'til late 2004, and they are selling to military and LE only.
Roguish Lawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2004, 07:03   #5
shadowflyer
Guerrilla
 
shadowflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Southern US
Posts: 160
Wonder if they will be making this one down at the Columbus GA Manufacturing facility? I had heard that they were only going to be making the XM-8 and a few select pistols down there.
__________________
" they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and they shall walk, and not faint."
shadowflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2004, 08:18   #6
NousDefionsDoc
Quiet Professional
 
NousDefionsDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 1,653
I know Larry Vickers in the Shot Show gallery. and I pretty much hate anybody that's there right now.
__________________
Somewhere a True Believer is training to kill you. He is training with minimal food or water, in austere conditions, training day and night. The only thing clean on him is his weapon and he made his web gear. He doesn't worry about what workout to do - his ruck weighs what it weighs, his runs end when the enemy stops chasing him. This True Believer is not concerned about 'how hard it is;' he knows either he wins or dies. He doesn't go home at 17:00, he is home.
He knows only The Cause.

Still want to quit?
NousDefionsDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2004, 09:33   #7
Ghostrider
Tank Boy
 
Ghostrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: KCMO
Posts: 171
Yes, what NDD said.

Quote:
Originally posted by NousDefionsDoc
I know ...... and I pretty much hate anybody that's there right now.
Concur, especially one of my TCs who gets to be there for free just being there with a HUMVEE as a static display.
__________________
To do nothing makes failure inevitable.
Ghostrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2004, 20:09   #8
QuietShootr
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hope they decide to sell the uppers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2004, 17:36   #9
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,779
Re: Honey! Bring the checkbook!

Quote:
Originally posted by NousDefionsDoc
Cool! Reaper was probably all over this.
As a matter of fact, I did get to play with the H&K M-16/M-4, and several XM-8 variants.

Liked the gas system and the steel mags of the H&K M-4, two weak points of the AR-15/M-16 systems.

I also was priviliged to watch Sinister Dave, Vickers, and a couple of other guys go at it in the H&K booth over the merits of the various systems. Learned quite a bit.

The 6.8 has no military future, IMHO. Didn't work too well at the Barrett demo, either. Has the potential to be a good LE caliber.

I must be old school, I would never offer a demo on a system that I hadn't personally tested that day, with that ammo, in that configuration, on that range, and could bet my life on.

Just my .02.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2004, 18:12   #10
Air.177
Quiet Professional
 
Air.177's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central TX
Posts: 1,390
TR-What did you think of the XM8?
Air.177 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2004, 18:22   #11
longrange1947
Quiet Professional
 
longrange1947's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fayetteville NC
Posts: 3,533
Reaper stated -
Quote:
The 6.8 has no military future, IMHO
I agree 100%. It is a flavor of the month.

The money used in developing a round that does not go with any other weapon or "indig supply point" would be better used in buying ammo that does work in the weapon systems now used in our allies.

Try running over to the nearest unit and ask for some spare 6.8 ammo. How about using the extra SAW ammo then, opps does not match either.
__________________
Hold Hard guys

Rick B.

Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit.
Wisdom is knowing it is great on a hamburger but not so great sticking one up your ass.

Author - Richard.

Experience is what you get right after you need it.

Author unknown.
longrange1947 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2004, 18:46   #12
NousDefionsDoc
Quiet Professional
 
NousDefionsDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 1,653
Quote:
I must be old school, I would never offer a demo on a system that I hadn't personally tested that day, with that ammo, in that configuration, on that range, and could bet my life on.
That's professionalism and experience. I'm the same exact way and that's one of the hardest things to drill into people's heads, especially about being instructors. And it shows glaringly as soon as the victim opens his mouth or does the first manipulation.

I too am interested in hearing your opinions on the HK carbines.
__________________
Somewhere a True Believer is training to kill you. He is training with minimal food or water, in austere conditions, training day and night. The only thing clean on him is his weapon and he made his web gear. He doesn't worry about what workout to do - his ruck weighs what it weighs, his runs end when the enemy stops chasing him. This True Believer is not concerned about 'how hard it is;' he knows either he wins or dies. He doesn't go home at 17:00, he is home.
He knows only The Cause.

Still want to quit?
NousDefionsDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2004, 20:02   #13
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,779
I think that H&K's M-4/M-16 mods to the gas system and mags address the most significant shortcomings with the current weapons and should be tested as the next PIP cycle rolls around. I can see little more that can be done beyond that for the current weapon, though I do believe that there are ammo and optical sight issues that could be improved on.

IMHO, the XM8 is an attempt to salvage something from the horrible OICW program. Having said that, if I was in the market to equip a force from scratch, I would strongly consider it, but would not dump an existing M-16 series weapon for it. It has some good characteristics, most from the G-36, though the rifle and optics could use some more work before I would consider testing them.

The biggest problem, as I see it, is that the Army is looking at replacing the 20" barrelled M-16 AND the 14.5" M-4 with the 12.5" XM-8. Other barrel lengths are available, but are not currently being considered. The conventional 5.56x45 FMJ is very velocity dependent in its wounding mechanism. The immutable laws of physics dictate that no matter how nice or sexy the weapon, a 12.5" barrel is not going to be more lethal than the already problematic 14.5" M-4, and may be less accurate. This would necessitate a better round (no, not the 6.8), a longer barrel, or both.

IMHO, the XM-8 does not provide much value added for the cost. For the amount of money spent, it is my belief that you would find a much better solution to soldiers hitting and killing bad guys in going to the 77 gr. bullet with sufficient quantities for all soldiers to shoot monthly, a good low powered optical sight, new ranges (indoor at BDE/BN level?), and well-qualified marksmanship training at a variety of KD and unknown ranges under varying conditions.

I am also sufficiently pragmatic to believe that the system may be adopted anyway for political reasons, regardless of the dubious value.

Just my .02, YMMV.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2004, 13:22   #14
Smokin Joe
Area Commander
 
Smokin Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,691
Quote:
Originally posted by The Reaper
I think that H&K's M-4/M-16 mods to the gas system and mags address the most significant shortcomings with the current weapons and should be tested as the next PIP cycle rolls around. I can see little more that can be done beyond that for the current weapon, though I do believe that there are ammo and optical sight issues that could be improved on.

IMHO, the XM8 is an attempt to salvage something from the horrible OICW program. Having said that, if I was in the market to equip a force from scratch, I would strongly consider it, but would not dump an existing M-16 series weapon for it. It has some good characteristics, most from the G-36, though the rifle and optics could use some more work before I would consider testing them.

The biggest problem, as I see it, is that the Army is looking at replacing the 20" barrelled M-16 AND the 14.5" M-4 with the 12.5" XM-8. Other barrel lengths are available, but are not currently being considered. The conventional 5.56x45 FMJ is very velocity dependent in its wounding mechanism. The immutable laws of physics dictate that no matter how nice or sexy the weapon, a 12.5" barrel is not going to be more lethal than the already problematic 14.5" M-4, and may be less accurate. This would necessitate a better round (no, not the 6.8), a longer barrel, or both.

IMHO, the XM-8 does not provide much value added for the cost. For the amount of money spent, it is my belief that you would find a much better solution to soldiers hitting and killing bad guys in going to the 77 gr. bullet with sufficient quantities for all soldiers to shoot monthly, a good low powered optical sight, new ranges (indoor at BDE/BN level?), and well-qualified marksmanship training at a variety of KD and unknown ranges under varying conditions.

I am also sufficiently pragmatic to believe that the system may be adopted anyway for political reasons, regardless of the dubious value.

Just my .02, YMMV.

TR
TR,

Please do not take this the wrong way (I'm not trying to be a smart ass).

What would your answer be to your above stated problems? I know you mentioned going to the 77 gr bullet but to solve the barrel issue what do you think should happen?

A bullpup rifle?

Or the same M-16/M-4 system with a 20 inch barrel?

Respectfully submitted
Smokin Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2004, 17:15   #15
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,779
You asked for it. Want to be serious about shooting skills with me as the CSA?

Anybody not doing dedicated CQB, in an armored vehicle, or jumping MFF regularly gets an 18" or 20" barrel.

Would prefer 16" for the shorter guns, but understand there may be exceptions.

Big Army goes to the 77gr. cannelured 5.56 bullet.

Anyone expecting to engage only at CQB range gets an M68 (Aimpoint Comp M2). Anyone engaging precision targets out to moderate range gets an ACOG TA31. Dedicated marksmen out to 600 meters or so get an SPR with a TS30A2 optic. Anyone shooting further than that gets a 7.62 gas rifle. Dedicated snipers retain the M-24.

The M-4 gets a closed gas system upper. Mags are expendable and will be replaced by steel mags, which will be crushed after the first mag related malfunction. Units deploying get all new mags, and range time to test fire them before deploying.

All marksmanship instructors will be proficient in the use of firearms, or they will not be training my soldiers. Master gunners and master trainers will get increased opportunities for advanced schooling and promotion.

All soldiers will qualify with their issue weapons on KD and unknown distance ranges, under all conditions, on combat simulators, and will engage in a force on force with Simunitions as a graduation exercise. Fail, die, and you get recycled till you pass, or are completely covered with one giant blood bruise.

Specialty weapons (M-249, M-203, M-240, M-2, etc.) users get two weeks of additional training and qualification on their assigned weapons. Graduate and collect extra incentive pay for being a steely eyed killer. Fail and retrain, retest. Fail again and back to the pool.

Soldiers showing exceptional skills in Basic Marksmanship will be given incentives for advanced schooling and training, promoted one grade, and offered assignment choices.

Divisional MTUs are reinstated. Competitions are held. Winners get prizes, money, promotion points, free leaves. Good MTUs get rewarded. Bad ones get retrained, retested, and back to the pool if still deficient. The AMU is responsible for training and evaluation, and reports directly to the CSA.

Soldiers must reverify shooting skills upon PCS reporting. No pencil whipping. Fail, be retrained, retested. Fail again, and return to a training pool for additional instruction.

MTU conducts testing, not your buddy. Infantrymen qualify every two months. Other Combat Arms every three months. CS/CSS, every four months.

New ranges will be built. Battalion and below have indoor ranges and sub-cal devices. Ammo and weapons are available for practice to soldiers to practice with on the range anytime with adult supervision. Lunch on the range anyone? Weapons effects simulators are in every battalion as well. Competitions are held and the winners get slots to advanced schools and training.

Ammunition is procured as required, and small arms ammo (.22LR, 9mm, 5.56, and 7.62) issued upon demand, not by allocation. Usage is monitored. Commanders get reports two levels below, and one above. Fail to shoot, but had time for DONSAs and Training Holidays? One warning. Then you are relieved.

Soldiers get paid for qualifying Expert, and are required to shoot for points as part of their promotion. Can't qualify, can't get promoted.

Get caught with an unmaintained/unserviceable weapon and get UCMJed. I don't care what your hair looks like. Can you use that smokewagon?

No more BS medals for "being there". You want a medal, kill bad guys or save your buddies.

Sorry, just my .02, YMMV.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fine, I'll bring the stirring stick Roguish Lawyer General Discussions 52 02-05-2004 15:00



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 17:40.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies