Communist British Government “Triggered” Condemns Free Speech Demands More Censorship
Communist British Government has already confiscated guns and deadly pocket knives from their Sheeple to “protect themselves” now they demand more censorship. Under the cloak of “protecting” the innocent and “punishing the internet bullies” the Communist British Government is demanding the Socialist Oogle/Fakebook and Twit censor their members.
This should not be an issue for the Socialist media giants as they have already complied with Communist China’s demand that certain “words” and “phrases” be removed from Communist China’s internet platforms.
And as with Communist China, the Communist British Government will probably soon demand that any political dissent, disparaging remarks concerning the Communist British Government, any political opponent’s speech or even talk of Free Speech be likewise censored.
And if you think this is “harsh” know that the Communist British Government already censors its publishers/newspapers/television etc.
(Let’s not forget Communist British Government Mass Surveillance program with it’s 4.2 MILLION Communist Cameras. And if Crime is on the rise just who are they watching?)
What were William Wallace’s last words?
I know what theresa may’s word is….. OBEY.
(Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Che, and Pol Pot are pleased.)
To the British Sheeple: Eat your soylent green and STFU.
Theresa May urged to prosecute web giants over abusive content
MPs call for prosecutions as part of a strict regime for social media companies first suggested in the Conservative manifesto.
19:56, UK,
Tuesday 12 December 2017
By Alexander J Martin, Technology Reporter
Social media companies should be prosecuted like publishers if they fail to remove abuse content, an influential committee is to tell the Government.
Social media companies are not currently regulated as publishers but are instead considered as platforms as they have limited control over the content they host.
This means that racist, extremist and child abuse content on Facebook, Google or Twitter does not receive the same sanctions as if it were published by a news organisation.
In a report being presented to Theresa May tomorrow, the Committee on Standards in Public Life will call for a change of the law to allow social media companies to be prosecuted like publishers, according to The Times.
The committee, which advises the Prime Minister,
has recently investigated the intimidation of Parliamentary candidates and received evidence relating to June's General Election from Facebook, Google and Twitter.
Jim Killock, executive director of Open Rights Group, described the call to censure web giants as "an attempt to make Mark Zuckerberg a national censor".
He said: "Facebook and Twitter will censor legal material because they are scared of fines.
"They are the worst people to judge right and wrong. Theresa May is in danger of removing people's right to a proper legal decision."
The committee's call comes months after the Conservatives made a manifesto pledge for a Digital Charter, which may include a move to tax social media sites to pay for action to tackle online bullying.
Confirmed in the Queen's Speech, the Digital Charter has ignited concerns from digital rights groups about the possible implications for civil liberties.
In the manifesto, the party said it would also introduce sanctions for companies that fail to meet their legal duties over content that is considered to be a breach of law.
The difficulties in establishing whether content could be illegal or not were highlighted earlier this year when YouTube deleted an archive of video evidence of potential war crimes in Syria.
In 2012, Twitter user Paul Chambers had his conviction overturned in the High Court after a joke threat on the messaging platform: "Crap! Robin Hood airport is closed. You've got a week and a bit to get your s*** together, otherwise I'm blowing the airport sky high!"
https://news.sky.com/story/theresa-m...ntent-11167820
Linear Mode
