I think this is being misinterpreted. As I read it, the amendment protects from liability those businesses that have the right to establish a gun free zone but choose not to. Could have been worded better, but seems to be in line with the intent of the original bill that is meant to discourage gun free zones and encourage handgun carry by means of potential liability claims (authorized for handgun carriers in gun free zones IAW the bill itself, prohibited against businesses that allow weapons IAW the stated amendment).
__________________
"Alabama soldiers...all I ask of you is to keep up with the Texans!" - Robert E. Lee, before the Battle of the Wilderness
|