Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > The Soapbox

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 08-13-2012, 08:31   #31
Dusty
Quiet Professional
 
Dusty's Avatar
 
Dusty is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Ozarks
Posts: 7,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZonieDiver View Post
This must be a good choice.

My liberal friends, judging by their FB posts, are in quite a dither... already!
lol They should be.

http://m.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee...165842666.html
__________________
"There you go, again." Ronald Reagan
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-13-2012, 08:43   #32
Badger52
Area Commander
 
Badger52 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Western WI
Posts: 1,918
Michael Reagan says, essentially, "Dad would approve."

Newsmax LINK
Quote:
He said that Wisconsin budget hawk Ryan will be able to stand toe-to-toe with President Barack Obama on key issues and will be a tremendous asset to a Romney administration with his expertise as chairman of the House Budget Committee.
Quote:
“We all knew that he had to figure out a way to reach out to conservatives. What he did with this was show that he wants a vice president that can be an active vice president. He said Ryan fits the bill and is "not just a vice president who’s going to have lunch with him once a week, visit other countries, go to funerals, and sit in the Senate.”
  Reply With Quote

Our Great Republic
Old 08-13-2012, 09:06   #33
Remington Raidr
Auxiliary
 
Remington Raidr is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: midwest
Posts: 92
Our Great Republic

is in need of a course correction. I am ALL IN.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-14-2012, 09:41   #34
afchic
Area Commander
 
afchic's Avatar
 
afchic is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 1,626
Found this, this morning and had to laugh outloud!!!
Words of Wisdom from the Onion
William Kristol
August 14, 2012 10:33 AM


America's second-best journal of politics and ideas gets it right:

Admit It, I Scare The Ever-Loving Shit Out Of You, Don't I?


By Paul Ryan


When Mitt Romney selected me as his running mate, I knew the Democratic attack dogs would come out in full force. They would say I’m a right-wing ideologue. They would say my views on entitlement programs are far too radical. They would say putting me on the ticket immediately kills Mitt Romney’s chances of becoming president because I’m a liability. But if we’re being honest with each other—if we’re able to put aside the talking points for a few minutes and say what we’re all actually thinking and feeling—I believe we can acknowledge the real truth here.

I’m young, I’m handsome, I’m smart, and I’m articulate. And that scares the ever-loving shit out of you. You can pretend like you have this thing in the bag, but you know good goddamn well that this race just got real interesting, real fast.

It’s okay to admit it. You’re frightened to death of me. It might actually be healthy for you to face your fears now rather than later, when Mitt and I are leading by a few points in the polls and it looks like this thing might end badly for you. Face it: I’m not some catastrophe waiting to happen, like a Sarah Palin or a Dan Quayle. On the contrary, you have the exact opposite fear. I’m a solid, competent, some might say exceptional, politician.

Did you get nervous when you read that last sentence? Is it because you know in your heart of hearts that it’s 100 percent true? Is it because, even if you strongly disagree with my beliefs on Medicare, Social Security, women’s rights, and marriage equality, you know my talent as a speaker and my well-thought-out approach to these issues—no matter how radical and convoluted you find them—might just be enough to win over independent voters?

Do you get chills just thinking about how strong my appeal actually is?
__________________
The Second Ammendment is in place in case politicians forget, or choose to ignore, the others.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-14-2012, 10:26   #35
Badger52
Area Commander
 
Badger52 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Western WI
Posts: 1,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by afchic View Post
Found this, this morning and had to laugh outloud!!!
LMAO, thanks very much for that. (Onion or not, I've been sayin' that for awhile. It's the exact reason during "bi-partisan" budget meetings they wish they could make him wait in the hall.)
  Reply With Quote

Ryan choice exposes truth about spending
Old 08-14-2012, 10:59   #36
tonyz
Area Commander
 
tonyz is online now
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,628
Ryan choice exposes truth about spending

The Paul Ryan Choice: Exposing the Truth About Spending

Investors Business Daily
Thomas Sowell
August 13, 2012

http://news.investors.com/article/62...are.htm?p=full

Gov. Mitt Romney's choice of Rep. Paul Ryan as his running mate is one of those decisions that seem obvious — if not inevitable — in retrospect, though it was by no means obvious to most of us beforehand.

To get a quick sense of who Ryan is, watch a short video of a February 2010 meeting in which Ryan politely, but devastatingly, "schools" Obama on the fraudulence of the statistics the Obama administration used to claim that ObamaCare would reduce the deficit. That video is available on the Drudge Report.

As a long-time member, and now chairman, of the House Budget Committee, Ryan is thoroughly familiar with both the facts and the fictions in the federal government's budget. In recent years, the fictions have grown much bigger than the facts. But, as Ryan reminded the president, hiding spending is not the same as reducing spending.

If this election is going to be decided on hard facts, the Obama administration is doomed. But the Obama campaign is well aware of that, which is why we are hearing so many distracting innuendoes and outright lies about such peripheral issues as what Romney is supposed to have done while running Bain Capital — or even what is supposed to have happened at Bain Capital, years after Romney was gone.

The Obama campaign's big smear, about how Romney is supposed to have caused a woman to die of cancer, has been exposed as a lie by CNN, hardly a Republican network. What smears like this show is that the Obama administration cannot run on its track record, so it has to run on distractions from the country's real problems.

When Sen. Harry Reid claims that Romney hasn't paid his income taxes, and demands that Romney disprove this unsubstantiated allegation, that raises an obvious question as to why the Internal Revenue Service has not prosecuted Romney, instead of leaving that to a partisan politician in an election year.

What makes this a farce is that Reid himself has not released his own income-tax records, while claiming that Romney's release of only two years of his income-tax records is not enough, even though it has been enough for other candidates in other years.

If Romney releases all his tax records going back to his childhood, it will not put a stop to this fishing expedition, much less bring an apology when those records show nothing illegal. It will just provide more material for making more distracting claims to change the subject from the record of the Obama administration.


When Ronald Reagan ran against President Carter back in 1980, he asked the question that should be asked of the voters when any president is seeking re-election:

"Are you better off than you were four years ago?"

Four years later, when Reagan ran for re-election, he implicitly asked and answered that same question in a campaign commercial titled "Morning in America," which listed the ways the country was better off than it had been four years earlier. Don't look for any "Morning in America" ads from Obama. "Mourning in America" might be more appropriate.

This election is a test, not just of the opposing candidates but of the voting public. If what voters want are the hard facts about where the country is, and where it's heading, they cannot vote for more of the same for the next four years.

But, if what they want is emotionally satisfying rhetoric and a promise to give them something for nothing, to be paid for by taxing somebody else, then Obama is their man. This is not to say that the public will in fact get something for nothing or that rich people will just pay higher taxes, when it is easy for them to escape taxation by investing overseas — creating jobs overseas.

Even if most Americans do not have their own taxes raised, that means little, if they end up paying other people's taxes in the higher prices of goods and services that pass along the higher taxes imposed on businesses.

There are no doubt voters who will vote on the basis of believing that Obama "cares" more about them. But that is a faith which passeth all understanding. The political mirage of something for nothing, from leaders who "care," has ruined many a nation.
__________________
The function of wisdom is to discriminate between good and evil.

Marcus Tullius Cicero
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:50.



Green Beret Foundation

Copyright 2004-2013 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies