California Students Now Have Six Different Genders

[Team Sergeant]

Guess I cannot attend the University of California education system, my gender choice is not listed, "Not Confused Primal Male"



University of California Students Now Have Six Different Genders They Can Choose From

Jul. 27, 2015 10:42am Kaitlyn Schallhorn

Students filling out applications for the University of California system can now choose between six different genders to identify themselves.

Asked the question, “How do you describe yourself?” prospective students can choose from the following: “male, female, trans male/trans man, trans female/trans woman, gender queer/gender non-conforming and different identity.”

cont:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015...n-choose-from/

[Hand]

If the liberal agenda is to gradually turn the globe into a single neighborhood, where everyone wears the same color and drives the same car and are given the same rations by their owners, where is this sudden explosion of choice of identity coming from?

[Box]

when you spread "individuality" so thin that everyone is different, JUST like everyone else, when you have is a society that is one layer thick...
...just a single layer. No depth - just what you see on the surface.

Liberal diversity is sleight of hand - nothing more, nothing less.

It isn't about diversity. It is about letting everyone choose their own coat of paint as long as the motor under the hood is the same.
...liberal diversity is all about letting you look however you like as long as you think the way you are told to think.

[Trapper John]

Originally Posted by Billy L-bach

when you spread "individuality" so thin that everyone is different, JUST like everyone else, when you have is a society that is one layer thick...
...just a single layer. No depth - just what you see on the surface.

Liberal diversity is sleight of hand - nothing more, nothing less.

It isn't about diversity. It is about letting everyone choose their own coat of paint as long as the motor under the hood is the same.
...liberal diversity is all about letting you look however you like as long as you think the way you are told to think.

Clearly you are not collective-thinking and that certainly is not good-speak. Get Thee to the nearest re-education camp post-haste.

[Box]

Originally Posted by Trapper John

Clearly you are not collective-thinking and that certainly is not good-speak. Get Thee to the nearest re-education camp post-haste.

Make no mistake...
...what I wrote was purely sarcastic.


I am firmly in the Clinton Camp and cannot wait until her glorious coronation.
It is my hope that I can someday revel in the greatness of a nation rebuilt in her shadow.
Hillary is doubleplusgood!

[Hand]

Originally Posted by Billy L-bach

Hillary is doubleplusgood!

[Sdiver]

Hillary is doubleplusgood!

Ooooo ... I like that. Simple and to the point.

I would think it would be a beautiful thing, the destruction of words. Of course the great wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns that can be got rid of as well. It isn't only the synonyms; there are also the antonyms. After all, what justification is there for a word which is simply the opposite of some other word? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take "good", for instance. If you have a word like "good", what need is there for a word like "bad"? "Ungood" will do just as well — better, because it's an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you want a stronger version of "good", what sense is there in having a whole string of vague useless words like "excellent" and "splendid" and all the rest of them? "Plusgood" covers the meaning, or "doubleplusgood" if you want something stronger still. Of course we use those forms already. but in the final version of Newspeak there'll be nothing else. In the end the whole notion of goodness and badness will be covered by only six words — in reality, only one word. Don't you see the beauty of that ...

Someone should look at making a new dictionary.

[craigepo]

Does it seem to anyone else like the world has lost its collective mind in the few weeks since the Supreme Court's gay marriage decision?

[The Reaper]

Originally Posted by craigepo

Does it seem to anyone else like the world has lost its collective mind in the few weeks since the Supreme Court's gay marriage decision?

It occurred to me about six years ago.

TR

[Paslode]

Originally Posted by craigepo

Does it seem to anyone else like the world has lost its collective mind in the few weeks since the Supreme Court's gay marriage decision?

Recently the world took a very noticeable leap towards radicalism, almost as though the radicals see the end game in sight.....but I am with TR, the freak show started 6 years ago when the zombie's blindly voted Zero into office.

[Badger52]

Originally Posted by Sdiver

Someone should look at making a new dictionary.

Probably no need. Tell your friends! Just keep using it often enough and it will wind up in the OED.

[ddoering]

Which one do they check for "Go fuck yourself?"

[PSM]

Originally Posted by ddoering

Which one do they check for "Go fuck yourself?"

None of the above?

Pat

[Box]

almost as though the radicals see the end game in sight...

There is no "end game" for liberals.
...you can always be controlled a "little more"

[Divemaster]

According to the progressives, there is nothing wrong with individuality as long as we all do it together.