Originally Posted by Sigaba
FWIW, I think that it was the "DADT only the first step" thread here
, the responses to Intel Cop
's posts in that thread, and then post numbers 101 to 104.
(In spite of his claims, I don't think MadDogG has read that extensively.)
Don't drag me into this mess!
The only thing that threw me off in that thread was one person flat out stating, "Yet you disagree with several QP's" (not word for word). I can take the ribbing, that's nothing, I just wasn't sure if there was a flat out rule against disagreeing with a QP.