Countdown to President Romney's Inauguration

[Dusty]

A week and a wakeup. I'm thinking Mitt will win 42-44 states.

He's nearly a cinch to nab PA, NC and FL, and he could easily take AZ, CO, and WI.

[Badger52]

Originally Posted by cbtengr

Bill Clinton also chimed in saying that not even he could have overcome a storm of that magnitude.

That was a nice touch.

Axelrod is in IPB mode; lotsa lawyers. Maybe they'll invite the UN election observers to NYC. Oh, wait...

[Sdiver]

Originally Posted by Dusty

A week and a wakeup. I'm thinking Mitt will win 42-44 states.

He's nearly a cinch to nab PA, NC and FL, and he could easily take AZ, CO, and WI.

He's also making a nice showing in Ohio according to the latest Rasmussen Reports .....

The race for Ohio’s Electoral College votes remains very close, but now Mitt Romney now has a two-point advantage.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Ohio Voters shows Romney with 50% support to President Obama’s 48%. One percent (1%) likes some other candidate, while another one percent (1%) remains undecided.

<snip>

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...ohio_president

That would be the "icing on the cake" if he can pull in this state.

[Dusty]

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2012/...y-jobs-report/

[MR2]

Captain Romney for America!

[Pete]

Well, the sitting President has Cumberland County, NC wrapped up and under his Christmas Tree - just like he did last time.

"....Democrats, women and blacks lead early voting in Cumberland County"

http://fayobserver.com/articles/2012...3?sac=fo.local

".................Of those, 62 percent were registered Democrats, compared with 21 percent for Republicans and 16.7 percent for unaffiliated voters.

Women in early voting in the county lead the gender gap by 15 percentage points.

And 54 percent who have voted are black, compared with 38 percent white. ...................."

This is a Democrat County for sure - But us R's add our total to the state numbers.

[Sdiver]

I like the way this map looks and how the numbers add up.

http://www.unskewedpolls.com/unskewe...esident_02.cfm

[Detonics]

Originally Posted by Sdiver

I like the way this map looks and how the numbers add up.

http://www.unskewedpolls.com/unskewe...esident_02.cfm

From that site: "District of Columbia 92.38% Obama vs. 6.42% Romney"

Image my surprise!

[Dusty]

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...h-early-voters

[BKKMAN]

Originally Posted by Dusty

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...h-early-voters

Gallup: R Up 72-45 with Early Voters

And they say that we don't need voter ID laws... 72+45 = 117%

Must be a lot of dead people voting

[PSM]

Originally Posted by BKKMAN

Gallup: R Up 72-45 with Early Voters

And they say that we don't need voter ID laws... 72+45 = 117%

Must be a lot of dead people voting

They fixed it. It's now 52-47.

Pat

[Dusty]

Originally Posted by BKKMAN

Gallup: R Up 72-45 with Early Voters

And they say that we don't need voter ID laws... 72+45 = 117%

Must be a lot of dead people voting

lolol

[Dusty]

http://washingtonexaminer.com/some-s...2#.UJBDfkbCz8B

Democrats more than Republicans are getting their most loyal supporters to vote early, but with polls showing a close race among those who have voted so far, concerns are being raised about a GOP tsunami on the actual Election Day, next Tuesday.

According to a GOP analysis of early voting and absentee ballot requests provided to Secrets, the Democrats are turning out their most reliable, or so-called "high propensity voters" than Republicans, leaving fewer for Election Day. The GOP is pushing weaker supporters to vote early, expecting high enthusiasm to drive their regular supporters to the polls next week.

"Democrats are cannibalizing their high-propensity voters in advance of election day to get stories that they are winning," said a GOP analyst. "But in effect they are stealing from Peter, or Election Day, to pay Paul, or early voting."

For example, in Ohio, the Democrats have turned out 43 percent of the most loyal supporters to vote, compared to just 27 percent of the GOP. In Iowa, the difference is 43 percent to 29 percent.

Snip

[Badger52]

Originally Posted by Dusty

[url]For example, in Ohio, the Democrats have turned out 43 percent of the most loyal supporters to vote, compared to just 27 percent of the GOP. In Iowa, the difference is 43 percent to 29 percent.

Conservatives tend to vote late, even in terms of time of day. They have diverse interests and/or have been working all day.

[Paslode]

Originally Posted by Dusty

http://washingtonexaminer.com/some-s...2#.UJBDfkbCz8B

Democrats more than Republicans are getting their most loyal supporters to vote early, but with polls showing a close race among those who have voted so far, concerns are being raised about a GOP tsunami on the actual Election Day, next Tuesday.

According to a GOP analysis of early voting and absentee ballot requests provided to Secrets, the Democrats are turning out their most reliable, or so-called "high propensity voters" than Republicans, leaving fewer for Election Day. The GOP is pushing weaker supporters to vote early, expecting high enthusiasm to drive their regular supporters to the polls next week.

"Democrats are cannibalizing their high-propensity voters in advance of election day to get stories that they are winning," said a GOP analyst. "But in effect they are stealing from Peter, or Election Day, to pay Paul, or early voting."

For example, in Ohio, the Democrats have turned out 43 percent of the most loyal supporters to vote, compared to just 27 percent of the GOP. In Iowa, the difference is 43 percent to 29 percent.

Snip

It's about the end of the road and only 7 days before we know which of the soothsayers have the best crystal balls......and likely began another 4 years of toxic debate, campaigning for 2016 and a new topic or two for conversation.